Maybe this is a weird question, but here goes anyway: For the ladies: Does the shape or length of a man's foreskin matter to you? Which looks better: A short foreskin with the glans just visible or a medium/long foreskin bunched at the tip? This isn't a question of whether you prefer cut/uncut guys, nor is it which is better. Just an opinion on foreskin style. Thanks
I get a kick out of the Greeks artisitic depictions in which the men often have impossibly long and straight foreskins. It was some sort of cultural signifigance to them it seems. (oddly enough, cant find example on google?)
Thx, yeah the Grecian athletes or hunters had almost 'spear' like foreskin action. Other GrecoRoman depictions are more polite and humble and really more 'childlike' I had been told that accounts for the foreskin sometimes being 'long and tapered' in that is more an attribute of a childs penis. The female foreskin (aka labias) are never presented (that ive ever seen) so I cant say what I would make of that. I noticed that they usualy have minimalistic nipplage. Going a bit off topic there but the ladies also were given more 'childlike' genitalia attributes. In another thread in this forum someone has posted pics of ancient depictions of the 'sex gods' and barbarians/Satyr type characters. Often with grotesque penis and that includes huge foreskins as well. Those were the sex beasts of the day heh.
