i watched a bit of the news and they said that the police have shot someone in london getting on a train or something maybe with another bomb? anyone know anything else bout it, i HATE this fuckin shit
Here in the news they said an 'azian looking guy' was shot up close with about 5 shots.. the police was already chasing him before that and they fired because they now have the right to shoot whenever they suspect someone being a bomber or whatever. Seems kinda odd.. "I think that person has a bomb".. "let's fire our guns at him"! Hm.. aren't you like, risking that you hit the bomb or sth? Anyways.. yeah, scary stuff.. total police power. I sincerely hope the guy was dangerous because if a couple of paranoid cops are not going to shoot everone who is not-white than that'll be the end.
Hm.. friend of mine just heard an eyewitness thingie on the news, who said he indeed had explosives in his backpack.. now I'm wondering two things: 1) how is a panicing eyewitness able to see that a backpack contains explosives (if it's that obvious, the bomber is a huge moron) 2) Why fire a gun at someone who has explosives on his body? Isn't that like.. kinda dangerous? Well apperantly not.. but still.. kinda big desiscion to make in the heat of the moment. Ah well.. they prolly did what was best.. but like I said.. I just truly hope that the guy was indeed dangerous.
what do you mean? That because carrying guns is illegal for civilians all this violence is happening? Yeah, like there is less violence in the US, where guns are legal.. *cough*
The funny thing is many times the guilty or hidding something type person runs . But other get frightning and run also . when you have a police than shoot any body your screw. and since citizens cant own any guns they are double screw.
ahh right ok, its a bit confusing cause if he did have something in his bag its not a good idea shooting him, but i surpose they might not have had any other choice. i was gonna go out but i think i will be a hermit and stay in, and if i do im NOT taking a bag. well at least if he did have a bomb or something they kill the prick. damn war
Yeah.. I live in Amsterdam and since this country was on that Al Quaida list a while ago, where they set the ultimatum for August and 'promised' to attack the capital cities of the named countries.. I'm kinda starting to get scared as well. I use public transport a lot here.. and hell, I even have muslim friends and I oppose the war! Shit, don't want to get bomb over something like that.. but just staying indoors.. I dunno.. but yeah, just don't wear a backpack and if you do, don't run Especially not if you are 'asian looking'...
I give you a example and this did not happen back in the 1960s either. = Black residents in a small town were being abuse and shot by police. the residents took arms police had no choice back off and never wonder in that town again . simply people got fed up. and there was a gun battle but lucky no body was hurt .
Picture your self as a train robber . you walk in the train car but theres a problem every body got a gun = The question is are you going to rob the train now?
so you are saying that in order to stop the police from shooting people they suspect are terrorist all the civilians should rise, pick up guns and fight the police? That doesn't sound like an ok sollution to me really. Have you heard of 'tute bianchi'? They are a sort of non-violent army that protects protestors against the riot police. They wear white overalls, carry shield, bullet proof vests, helmets, masks etc etc.. and form a cordon between the unarmed protestors and the armed riot police. They are pretty controversial in the 'leftish' world though, with good reason 'cause they're kind of elitist.. but it's more along the lines I'd think of when it comes to stopping violence. some pics:
naa im not asian looking, the scarey thing is i have muslim friends and one of them if more than a friend, i might fone him and see if hes ok. i wont be running anywhere either, there are even police where i live walking around and thats 2 hrs from london grrrreat
Every state that adopted the conceal weapon license that state saw a big drop in violent crime. little theft well allways exist = most people dont care much about loosing a few dollar items once in a while. AND violent crime in the U.S have decline. were in england theft is going up.
Velvet your LIVE in dream world. i saw and remenber the japanase protestor going against the police it look like a battle taken place in the 1200 A.D . Japanase even used gasoline bottle as fire bombs many cops were burn.
again, what's up with the grammar/spelling etc today? You're drunk or what? Well.. if you think fighting the police with hard violence in the US and/or the UK is a good idea, than go ahead.. please do so. What's stopping you?
And Velvet the reason i said that was becouse your opening stament sounded like the british police was getting out of hand. and thats what your bitching about. In the U.S a terrorist might be able to slam a passenger plane into a building . "you can do that in many country " but terrorist would not and could not run the streets and do what ever they want simply becouse in many states people not cops would simply not tolerate the bullshit. The U.S by 1997 statistic have 42 million gun owners and 190 million firearms. 46 millions are handguns and this might be under rated.
I just said that I truly hope the guy is indeed guilty of what he is killed for.. that's all. Untill they give an official statement, you ànd I don't know if what the police just did is justified.