YouCallYourselvesAnarchists?

Ha! you all think that your own personal issues are enough to protest over how F*cking pathetic! you say overthrow the people, grow drugs, be gay but thats just friggin stupid. The governments not the people are in control. The governments are the ones screwing us not the people. The people just dont know what is really going on.

Dont believe me? There is a book called Chaos Point you should read it.

Dont want to read it? Then you are the ones responsible for your own problems, continued ignorance and stuidity.

 

I never called myself and anarchist.

 

NO? you protest dont you? you disagree with the controls and laws imposed upon you by governments and religions dont you?you see where the world is headed and dont like it? if you dont agree with religions, governments or dont like the way things are headed then you are technically an anarchist.

 

No I am not technically an anarchist and I refuse to be labelled as such by a snippy newcomer to the board.

 

I am not snippy let me explain. Anarchism while an old term has to be replaced with a new meaning. This meaning has to incorporate ruthlessness, political power and a extreme desire to make the governments do what must be done to insure our future and the future of the next generations.

 

What does agreeing with religigions, certain governments or liking the way things are headed have anything to do with an anarchist? I don't agree with many on here but if anything they are presenting socialist ideals not anarchist. Just because you don't like all of the laws in a country does not mean you would rather live with no government.

Yea, everyone wants overthrow the people. How do you overthrow yourself anyway. To me stupid is posting up this spam with no logical thought going into it.

 

I dont disagree the background on this site is stupid then.

I didnt say that governments shouldnt exist i think that there should be one government, one economic set of values and a dollar should be worth a dollar no matter what area of the world you live on.


Socialism? The communists tried that, they failed miserably. I know that modern socialism might work but do you really think that you can bring down corporations and capitalism itself? Without capitalism we wouldnt have everything we take for granted in our daily existance.

 

So you are a globalist?

 

I suppose so.

Anarchy is merely a term originally meaning disorder. Through disorder does order arise.

I merely think that there should be enough disorder to give a new world order a chance to rise through the chaos.

 

Honey,let me ask you,is there somebody here who said ''i am an anarchist''???Uh..maybe you simply didn't sleep in a good way this night...
Anyway,don't be so aggressive here, and keep quiet please,you seem too much nervous.We are not all anarchist,and even if we were you're not allowed to judge us!You can't call us anarchist just because we fight for our rights, and we protest to say '' i don't agree with this or that''.And above all, i think that most of people there protest pacifically,it is an our right.

 

You propose a global government, and in the next breath advocate widespread disorder. Having trouble following you.

If you truly wish for a new world order on a global scale you should be walking in lock step behind GW and his conservative cronies that's what they dream of also.

 

Aggressive? I have only decided not to be pathetic. You need to be aggressive to make the world change without aggressiveness and ruthlessness we are all doomed.

 

How old are you? 13?

 

A POLITICAL THEORY? Ha do you really think that governments are unnecessary? They are necessary but there is no need for so many only one. Voluntary assosciation and free asscociation of groups?

I do propose a global government but do you think that any government will willingly hand over power to a world government? No they wont because they dont want to lose power the only way for a world government to arise is if the world is in disorder therefore creating the opportunity for this government to be created.

 

Really? Tell me do you naturally argue with people you dont understand?

 

I didn't write the definition of anarchism.

What if I don't wish to be part of your global creation? What if I wish to protect my regional interests and identity. Why should I grant your proposed government that type of control. Napoleon and Hitler had dreams of world control. I'd rather deal with smaller scale despots.

 

Do you really think that this government would demand the sacrifice of your regional interests or identity? To tell you the truth i dont think it would all countries would instead be states in the world government.

Napolean and Hitler were fools. They tried to conquer the world i would mere resurrect a better world from the ruins of the old or if possible now i would rescue the world from the hands of greedy governments who squander our resources.

This government would also be democratic.

 

And based on the value of a dollar? No thank you.

 

Why? all of the different types of money across the world should be worth the same no matter what.

Do you think that just because your government controls the economy and worth of world wide money that it should remain that way?