More On My Case And The Rights Of The Mentally Ill In Michigan.
Published by Jimbee68 in the blog Jimbee68's blog. Views: 28
There's more with driving, the bathroom and Detroit in general. All three of those things and how they became an important medical and legal issue, and form of abuse, around 1990 as I've said. Around 1990-3, my urinary problems were very pronounced. Even by 1994 or 5 I remember, I'd stand in front of a urinal and nothing would come out. And so I spent a long time in bathrooms on average. That, and the fact I take a very long time to clean up after #2. Literally at least 15-20 wipes under the best of circumstances. (Which has a tendency to clog toilets too you know. Making me even more unpopular in people's public restrooms. FWIW, now I try to wait till home for that. But my colitis did flair up. In 1993 and around 1998. And not to get graphic, but I am going #2 more now for some reason. And around 10-15 years ago I was losing control of #2. Which last one has gotten better now though, for some reason.) But around 1990 or 1, this form of psychological abuse began of denying me access to strategic bathrooms. Like I said, I thought at time some people just don't understand. People with medical problems like colitis, frequent urination, being confined to a wheelchair, loss of control problems, etc. need almost unlimited access to bathrooms. And many businesses don't provide them, and some of them become very obnoxious about them when people use them often, spend a long time in there or make a mess. And like I said, that c. 1990 form of abuse seemed to start when I feared someone would deny me all access to bathrooms some day. Maybe on the road, or I vaguely recall something about mental hospitals like Northville. And that is when that all began for some reason. But that is actually a good point by itself if I didn't have a car. Walking around my neighborhood in search or restrooms, especially late into the evening after 9 PM and late at night, waiting for buses and missing them for that reason, dirty and unsafe bathrooms. And now some of the businesses in Detroit like restaurants have closed their bathrooms for good. They tell me because patrons abuse the privilege. I tell them that the MI board of health requires restaurants provide bathrooms. But they tell me they just don't care. And now my guardian and my neighbors are still thinking of that, taking away my car. I know they are still thinking of that, because they'll always be thinking about that. It has something to do with taking away the rights of the disabled and mentally ill (and BTW, I still demand what I just said about that be investigated thoroughly). But like my mother told me when I was carjacked and had a large caliber gun jabbed in my back in the Summer of 1991, that is all the more reason to consider doing absolutely nothing in Detroit. And then in 2005 the police, my doctor, my family even, started saying, well maybe you should lose your car, even though you are an excellent driver with a license. Just to make the police, your neighbors and your psychiatrist feel better, was all I was told. I think like my friend across street once told me was closer to the truth. The less I do in Detroit the better. Don't even mail a letter here, like he said.
Anyways like I've been telling people, and read this carefully so there is no misunderstanding. This is an official demand of mine. I think my guardian should spend at least one night in a jail cell for contempt of court. (And I told you, the next time one of my neighbors claims that a fellow neighbor who is minding their own business and doing nothing wrong should not be driving, all while they have no insurance and a suspended license, I think they should receive a warning. And then jail time after that. I think that should the rule in Detroit and Michigan. But I demand it as part of my legal case at least in my neighborhood.) Now I am sure my guardian would be sent to a nice one near him home in his affluent suburb. And I'm sure he'd fare better there than I would in one. Or in a mental hospital, or group home or wherever he was planning on sending me. Maybe even worse than that. Because the last Christmas I was at him house he play acting, in an obvious way this time, like he was racked with guilt over something, obviously to show me he had done or planned something horrible towards me, but wouldn't go into detail. But I think if we did this, just once like I said, that would solve everything. Because not only would he see we mean business, but so would everyone else in this situation. My doctors, all the other people in my life and the police and first responders. And, the police and first responders are protected by sovereign immunity. My guardian is not. And like I was telling that doctor yesterday, that would make my guardian serve as a good example to all of them and focus their mind on what is important here. That is what jailing for contempt of court is used for, I was just talking to another person the other day about. It is a psychological tool to show everyone in the situation that they are to stop what they are doing to the defendant or the victim of their abuse, and that the court is not playing around anymore. Or like my 2011 therapist added to that movie that ironically came out in 2004, paraphrasing Shakespeare now. Sometimes the quality of mercy IS strain'd. So anyways, people all my life have bullied and mentally abused me. And when I got them in trouble, they claimed I was being too cold-hearted and clinical about it. But in any event, that is my new legal demand. Focusing legal attention on the one person who did the worst the of the offenses like many in that situation, but is not protected by sovereign immunity, is called legal expediency. I already knew that word, and I looked it up. It is the correct term, and I will use it from now on with this new request.
You need to be logged in to comment