He may not always be correct but his reply makes sense to me. Who knows what was there before Big Bang? :D yeah, there are many barriers like...
OWB, someone asked Stephen Hawking what was there before Big Bang and he gave fairly good answer saying the question is meaningless because there...
Science is not Politics. In Politics you have goals and you look for means to accomplish it. In Science, you look at Nature and try to...
Dogma is dogma, no matter what you type.
Call it all you want, it is what it is (darwinism = a. religious theory, wishful fantasy of one man called C. Darwin. Has many followers....
Your conclusion is not accurate. I do understand and know the reason of what you call my "frustration". It is not that evolution is accepted by a...
UFO is a rocketplane that flies on horsepoop.
No, but even if you do and i have, it would be irrelevant to argument. I actually asked quite a few unanswered yet questions and you can check...
Ad hominem abusive Ad hominem abusive (also called argumentum ad personam) usually involves insulting or belittling one's opponent, but can also...
Well, let me first start with reiterating the fact that this subject thread is not about me. So even if you repeat countless times that i have...
Xac, please cure me of my "obvious paranoia" by answering the following simple question: If you are not perpetrating a hoax nor have religious...
Evidently, you are the one doing that and here is why I never disputed that Gravity is a reasonable explanation for round shape of Earth. What...
Okiefreak made an analogy of Flat Earthers not accepting the evidence of Earth having round shape, not of Flat Earthers disputing Gravity. To...
Earth is round and can be observed to be so from the space. But Earth being round is NOT an evidence of mechanism responsible for it's being...
If all else failed, by showing the picture of Earth from the space. You are an imbecile. I do not doubt the evidence presented. I don't say...
Monkey boy, i think you have hard time distinguishing between "evidence" and "conclusion" reached based on the same. Point was not to show exact...
To be accurate not one assertion of darwinists was backed up without being debunked , on this or few other trheads.
Your post about "munipulated" bird is fun and dandy, only it doesn't prove any point.
I noticed that you work very hard to make those Munchausens appear infinitely more credible and rational than they actually are :D
Did it ever occur to you that i may have quoted you because it was your post to which i replied where you were describing evolutionists' take on...
Separate names with a comma.
