"You might think of it as your eyes finally being opened to reality. But you have no point of reference for what is and isn't real." That is...
At least you know where i'm coming from. Ofcourse i know what they mean. They mean that "right" things are things we should work towards and...
If you have read the above conversation you will see that i have had a very hard time explaining why there is nothing to explain. Lets not get...
I have to go now.. but i will continue at another time. I think you have still failed to explain how we distinguish between indidividual ethics...
That is exactly what existentialism argues for. How can you claim all that stuff about universally sound human rights and stuff and also say i...
Well all positions are attacked from other positions that claim there is no evidence. If we use physics to understand the universe then we cannot...
But you can only find fault in their argument. With an argument you don't agree with... all you can do is follow the line of thought until you...
I just don't think that the world is organised. The world is made up of so many atoms... and they are all just arranged into various shapes and...
Nice donnie d mix as well.
This is like one big debate across three boards xD Well meaning and emotion aren't the same thing. Emotion is real to us. All our past...
I don't really have the time to reply in full right now.. but i'll say this... so you do not believe in objective ethics? right? but you believe...
I don't mean that we can revert to being anything likes babies again... but we can lose any sense of meaning. We are babies again but only in that...
Yes discussing anything in terms of objectivity is impossible. I talk about a functional society as one that works in certain terms. I agree that...
Well.. that is the title of my thread.. i am trying to explain this simple point. Well where is your evidence that "what is right for man kind =...
People all over the world are living for reasons they created themselves.. not particularly enpowering ones.. but nevertheless reasons. Just as...
please explain.
Well.. once again it is a position.. it is not always agreed upon... but by the basic laws of cause and effect we cannot have freedom of will.......
Wikipedia: Atheism, as an explicit position, can be either the affirmation of the nonexistence of gods,[1] or the rejection of theism. So.....
I guess so. The biggest problem with debate i guess. I admit what i said was confusing.. as i am confused about freedom of will and...
Okay but my point was that agnostics are atheists. Richard Dawkins is a self proclaimed agnostic atheist (i think).
Separate names with a comma.
