9/11 truth now!

Upon closer inspection I apologize for that one.

 

http://911-strike.com/pentagon.htm <<"While the tailfin evidence and the lack of any evidence of a correctly sized fuselage may be inconclusive, the white exhaust plume is completely inconsistent with a 757. Furthermore, we agree with Brunel's analysis, that the explosion appears to be a result of shaped charges, not a jet fuel fire. So if the security camera frames are genuine, they represent hard proof that the government is lying about the Pentagon and flight 77." >>

 

"What was left of the plane flowed into the structure in a state closer to a liquid than a solid mass."

This?

My friend said, make the fist like I have below....and hit a plasterboard wall...see what happens. Ok, don't but, if you do it slowly you will see how it represents the front of a plane and your little finger and thumb represent the wings. If you did hit the plasterboard, say goodbye to your finger/thumb ...but you'll have a nice round hole in your wall.

 

http://911-strike.com/missing-confetti.htm << "A team of computer scientists and engineers at Purdue University ran a simulation study to illustrate the dynamics of a 757 strike against the Pentagon. Their study showed the 757 penetrating the Pentagon facade across the entire width of the wings of the airplane, which is a surprising finding as we will show below -- and is also quite different from what actually happened, as the wings clearly did not penetrate the facade." >>

 

Also remember, as to why some windows didn't break near the impact site(I don't know how people link that fact into a conspiracy), it's the pentagon, it's the center of the entire $660 billion a year department of defense, they've built the building secure enough to deal with some kind of whack job with a bomb or something. A plane however they did not expect.

 

Regarding the windows...I believe the boring details are in the Pentagon Report I posted earlier.

 

There does seem to be a lack of wreckage if the wings stayed outside of the building.

 

They didn't, all the wreckage collected around the first and second ring of the pentagon then burned in fire and explosion.

 

For example
http://911review.com/attack/pentagon/imgs/debris_small_2.jpg

There was a very large amount of debris and wreckage at the first ring of the building.

and
http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/PentagonDebrisMontagecopy1.jpg/PentagonDebrisMontagecopy1-full.jpg

 

http://www.thepentacon.com/

<< "You have reached a website hosting a documentary with groundbreaking witness interviews proving the 9/11 official story false. There are many aspects of 9/11 but this movie focuses specifically on the events as they happened at the Pentagon.

<< "These first-hand eyewitness accounts were obtained by Citizen Investigation Team in a persistent effort to find the truth in light of a myriad of questions. We contacted as many of the previously published eyewitnesses we could obtain contact information for, and we canvassed the neighborhoods of Arlington Virginia on foot in a quest to find previously unknown witnesses. Our goal was to establish the final flight path of the plane before it reached the Pentagon as seen by the eyewitnesses.

<< "The results are devastating as we now know for sure that the plane can not be what damaged the Pentagon.

<< "We first present the 'Smoking Gun Version' featuring quadruple corroborated testimony showing beyond a reasonable doubt that the plane flew on the north side of the CITGO station completely contradicting the official story. This simple fact makes it impossible for the plane to have toppled the light poles and damage the building as outlined in the "Building Performance Report" by the American Society of Civil Engineers." >>

 

Zooming in on the red box just above shows tons of apparent metal debris outside the Pentagon bulldozed aside to make way for recovery. This collection of debris probably contains much of the fragmented wings of Flight 77: ​

None of the images I have seen look like they are clean of debris.
However, having never seen a building like the Pentagon hit by a plane...I'm not 100% sure what I would see.​

(A lot of conspiracy sites seem to crop these images...I wonder why?)​

 

Notice how BCH can't actually make an argument except post links, you're not totally swayed to his side Phelps, c'mon, use your logic.

 

That is a good photo. I do notice its location seems to coincide with the door into what I'm led to believe was a construction site at the time of 9/11. It does resemble a wing but could also be a pile of debris. It looks like one of the guys is even lounging on part of it.

 

It's nothing short of INCREDIBLE that a couple of Arabic passports were pulled out from the rubble at the scene of the World Trade Center disaster. Does anyone have a logical explanation for this ? When you really think about it, it must have been some kind of a manipulative stunt that was employed by the government so as to shift blame for the disaster onto the innocent Arabs.

 

Well it might be the wing, but it could be any part of fuselage, I think only an aircraft mechanic would be able to tell the difference.

Also in terms of the whole missile theory, conspiracy theorists on one hand give the government credit to orchestrate this master plan, but apparently also give them the credit to build missiles that are basically V-2 1944 strength in design. Had a missile hit the pentagon the damage would've been much greater, and more importantly there'd be a crater and a more defined damage zone as missiles are an actual explosion meant to happen. It also wouldn't be on the side of the building like that, missiles can't come in at that trajectory.

 

Try again, one, there'd be no reason to have to plant a the passports to begin with, and secondly, stop making up numbers you asshole, ONE passport was found:

http://www.911myths.com/html/passport_recovered.html

read that link Phelps, don't believe in this jackass.

 

Everything BCH has been refuted time after time, year after year, for almost 10 years now, and they've run out of things to come up with so now they just post the same stale things over and over again so he can try to convince people there's a world wide Jewish conspiracy that caused this.

Yes, he really believes it was a zionist conspiracy. Read more of his posts, he's beyond paranoid, you have to think to yourself "wait, this guy lives in a delusional wasteland, wtf is wrong with his logic" I don't mean on just this, read all his posts on various world events and the zionist conspiracy

 

Those airplanes were able to pulverize many tons of construction grade steel into billions of microscopic dust particles, but they had NO apparent impact on a couple of Arabic passports. There are two likely explanations that may account for this strange and unusual phenomenon: A) It could have been the hand of G-d revealing his hatred toward all things Arabic, or B) It could have been the "hidden hand" of Wolf Blitzer and Paul Wolfowitz and Company. In other words, the passports were phony evidence, and they were planted in the rubble by "you know who" with the intention of inciting public hatred against the Arabs. The existence of the phony evidence was then trumpeted to the world as a "fact" by the very same people who planted the phony evidence in the rubble in the first place.

 

LOLZ fact, what fact, your own delusional fuckin paranoid mind. Why don't you read the article of all the shit found from the different crash sites. I know this may rock your world and send it crumbling down, but shit actually survives all kinds of explosions and accidents. Not everything just vaporizes on sight.

This picture might destroy your world:


Notice the debris before either tower fell, and notice what those men are doing..........examining a seat cushion from one of the planes. Jesus things can survive an atomic explosion and he's arguing some documents can't survive an airplane crash.

Because you know, no other jetliner as ever crashed into anything and exploded before, ever, in the history of man to show this happening hundreds if not thousands of times in history. Nope, never ever.

 

You know how stuff doesn't survive explosions and stuff, yea, well what about all the debris FROM THE COLUMBIA SHUTTLE, jesus it's destruction was far more intense then any airplane has ever had

and watch, his next post will conveniently ignore the fact personal artifacts and inside parts of the plane are recovered in nearly every airline crash/explosion and ignore the fact shit can even survive heat that makes the fires on 9/11 look like nothing in an explosion 40 miles above the surface of the earth