http://jewishcrimenetworkdid911.blogspot.com/ << "Why would a terrorist group call itself ‘The Toilet’? Al-Qaeda is Jewish fiction." >>
You've obviously never seen an inferno before have you? Buildings have plenty of god damn flammable things in them even when the fire isn't caused by jumbo jets smashing into them. See the great thing about physics which you will learn is that basically everything will burn if it gets hot enough. You know, all that crap inside the buildings themselves Ok, see the main problem with this logic that always gets thrown around is that near anyone, who is anyone that has oil business, especially in the mid-east, has connections to the Bin Laden family. They're one of the biggest industrial/money names in Saudi Arabia, and lo and behold, most of them are not terrorists, but are in fact businessmen with ventures around the world. In fact Osama was disowned from the family long before 9/11. I love how no matter how much every conspiracy gets struck down with this awesome thing called science in terms of the buildings, and pragmatism in terms of connections, conspiracy theorist just keep reaching out to grasp at nothing in the air. If you guys were on the Titanic you would refuse to get into the lifeboats under the impression the ship was not actually sinking and all of the plugs in the lifeboats would mysteriously be gone when you hit the water and you'd all sink and freeze. Or apparently people who still believe in the Jewish world wide conspiracy. SIEG HEIL!
I agree that metal is going to burn, but only on the condition that the fire gets hot enough. Class "A" fires are listed as wood and paper fires. Class "B" fires are listed as flammable liquid fires. Class "C" fires are listed as electrical fires. I believe that Class "D" fires are listed as metal fires. Some types of metal are known to be more flammable than other types of metal. Magnesium, for example, is said to be extremely flammable in comparison with most other metals; however, there is no evidence that would indicate that construction grade steel is very flammable. In fact, it would take an enormous amount of HEAT and TIME in order to ignite one (1) single steel girder of the type that was holding up the central core of the World Trade Center. I have seen no evidence in support of the notion that the fires on 9-11 were hot enough to ignite those gigantic steel girders. The thick black smoke constitutes evidence that NO INFERNO was present in those towers on the morning of 9-11-01.
The so-called "war on terrorism" was conceived in the Jewish state of Israel. It is the brainchild of Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu, who coined the term in a book that he wrote many years before the concept morphed into reality. A strange attack took place in New York City on the morning of 9-11-01, but instead of conducting an immediate comprehensive investigation into the crime, the newsmedia (which is owned and controlled by wealthy zionists) immediately placed the blame on the Arabs !
Did you read any of the points made earlier in this thread or do you just like to keep grabbing onto nothing in the air? The point is the metal never caught on fire period, heat like that weakens metal, metal is a pretty good conductor of heat, heated metal softens and loses it's load bearing abilities. This is just the fucking stupidest thing I've ever read. Sure, millions upon millions of pounds of furniture, carpet, plastics, wood, ceramics, electronics, ect, fueled by jet fuel wouldn't cause black smoke. Obviously. Well yes, a state like Israel that experienced terrorism on a near daily basis at the time probably would have a concept of a "war on terrorism" brought about probably by many politicians. Let's see, we were attacked, buildings are on fire, no one knows what's happening, obviously reporters are going to make detailed analyzed reports. Also for the record it was pretty obvious who did it by the next day, most of the idea that the Arabs did it came from the footage of Palestinians dancing in the street after hearing of the news when even people in Iran were showing their respects. Before that footage came out though most of the TV stations around here(this being the NYC metro area) were actually playing the North Korea card though, so what exactly was your point again?
I'd appreciate if you could show me where I said that the metal ever caught on fire. I never said that it did. I don't believe that enough heat was present to cause the structural steel to lose its load-bearing abilities. I'm sure that we've all seen those infamous photographs that were taken on the morning of 9-11-01. In those photographs, we can clearly see that people were standing at the outer perimeters of the Twin Towers (next to the upper-floor windows) just prior to the collapse of the World Trade Center. Now, there wasn't a whole lot of time that elapsed between the initial impact of the airplanes and the collapse of those skyscrapers. In other words, THERE SIMPLY WASN'T ENOUGH TIME for the heat to weaken that enormous matrix of reinforced steel which held those massive central cores in place for three decades. In proportional terms, it would make JUST AS MUCH SENSE if you tried to argue that you can weaken a twenty-foot-tall piece of steel in two hours flat simply by holding a cigarette lighter to it. Now, if we're going to assume that the so-called "inferno" was sufficiently hot enough to weaken the structural supports of those two enormous skyscrapers in less than three hour's time, then we'll ALSO have to ask ourselves WHY it wasn't hot enough to melt those people into ashes right before our very eyes. I can tell you why it didn't cause those people to disintegrate from the heat of the fire: It's because there was simply no inferno ! There was a fire, yes, but there was no "inferno." The firefighters had arrived on the scene, and they were putting out the fire. It was a weak fire, and there's no possible way that such a weak fire could have caused those towers to explode the way they did. It was thermite or thermate which caused those skyscrapers to disintegrate in such a short duration of time, not any supposed "inferno."
http://guardian.150m.com/palestine/jewish-terrorism.htm << "July 22, 1946. Zionist terrorists blew up the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, which housed the central offices of the civilian administration of the government of Palestine, killing or injuring more than 200 persons. The Irgun officially claimed responsibility for the incident, but subsequent evidence indicated that both the Haganah and the Jewish Agency were involved." >>
there are "experts" on both sides of the fence, everyone is attributing arguments to support their own theories.... the truth is, we will never know the truth....and even if by some miracle it did come out, there would still be "experts" saying otherwise. some world eh?!
Yeah, I hear ya. Nobody really knows exactly what happened on 9-11 except for Michael Chertoff and Dov Zakheim and the rest of that treasonous dual-citizen ("Israel first") Zionist crowd, so there's really ONLY ONE PRUDENT THING YOU CAN DO in the face of uncertainty, and that is to simply accept the government's official brainwashing ! So let's go ahead and let's send our children off to Iraq so that they can slaughter even more Arabs. Isn't that right ? In other words, "when in doubt, kill more Arabs." Netanyahu agrees.
OK, 1946 was a long time ago ... but you've gotta admit that the episode DOES provide a graphic illustration of the Zionist penchant for blowing up buildings. When the Zionists get up on their soapbox and accuse others of engaging in "terrorism," have you ever suspected that maybe they're projecting their own homicidal proclivities onto others? Sort of like the "pot calling the kettle black."
http://jewishracism.blogspot.com/2006/12/israeli-terrorism-against-united.html<< "The Israeli Government has committed acts of war against the United States by bombing American interests in Egypt in 1954 with Israel's "Operation Susannah" in the "Lavon Affair"[1] and by attempting to sink the U. S. S. Liberty in 1967.[2] In both instances, the Israeli Government tried to lay blame on Egypt for the Israeli attacks on the United States, in an attempt to incite the United States to fight Israel's enemies. In the 1970's, the Israelis attempted to assassinate United States Ambassador to Lebanon, John Gunther Dean, as well as his entire family.[3]" >>
Who doesn't blow up buildings? Like jeez, everyone from communist guerrillas to hardcore anti abortion people, to militias in Montana who fear the government, to muslims and Jews, terrorism applies to everyone.
The Swedes don't go around blowing up buildings, nor do the Swiss or the Finlanders or the Norwegians or the Canadians or the Guatamalans, nor do the French or the Dutch or the African Bushmen, etc. The fact is that NOBODY goes around blowing up buildings except for the Zionists and their alleged adversaries (who could in fact be "strawmen" who were created by the Zionists, as an excuse for bringing about the so-called "retaliatory bombardment" of hospitals and power plants and refugee camps and civilian population centers, etc. etc.).
Yep, the Nordic peoples live in peace. Canadians are happy with beer, hockey and Boxing Day...but...Did you know the Swiss wrote the book on guerrilla warfare? That includes instructions on bombings in its pages. Guatamala? Better check out your history books on that one. Civil wars, y'know. African Bushmen? WTF? The French? Tell that to Greenpeace. Bombing a ship is no different than a building. The Dutch? Think Colonial Africa. Past history but it speaks of the capability. Nobody???? The IRA stands for the IRISH republican army, not the Zionist rep. army. Then there's the SPANISH Basques. They blow shit up. Then there's our own home grown bombers. You gonna tell me Tim McVeigh was a Zionist? The Weathermen were Zionists? How about the Puerto Rican liberation front? Latino Zionists? Nobody?? German terrorists blew shit up. So have Italians, Portuguese, Russians, Slavs, etc...etc...etc. Shit. You're bombing, too!! ZIONIST!!! LOL! Move along folks...nothing to see here...just another troll on a racist rant. Zen
It doesn't make any sense at all when you say that "the Swiss" wrote a book about guerrilla warfare. I can see how you might say that a person of SWISS HERITAGE or that perhaps a CITIZEN OF SWITZERLAND wrote a book about guerrilla warfare, but to say that "The Swiss" in the general sense wrote a book about something ... now THAT is totally and completely outrageous. Have the Guatamalans ever been known to export terrorism out of Guatamala and into the far reaches of the globe ? Do the Guatamalans see themselves as being "chosen by God" to exterminate the gentiles ? I think not. I get it ! I can see what you're trying to say here: what you're trying to say here is that the US government was (and is) totally infiltrated by a cabal of ambitious Frenchmen who were (and are) trying to instigate wars and military invasions in the Middle East, and that on the morning of 9-11-01, in the city of New York, the World Trade Center was destroyed primarily because the government of France was looking to establish "Greater France" or "Eretz France" ... or a French Empire which is to extend "from the Nile to the Euphrates" !! Yeah, but have the Dutch ever been known to trek around the world with terrorist intentions ? I doubt it. The Irish are perhaps the only "goyim" I can think of that are even remotely comparable to the Zionist Jews, but then again, it's really a very poor comparison because the IRA has never been involved in the instigation of foreign military invasions through terrorism. Most of the shit that the IRA has done, was done locally in Ireland or in Britain. The IRA has never been involved in carrying out terrorist attacks against a third party with the intention of inciting that third party into carrying out a foreign military invasion against their enemies. OK ... but have they ever been known to export their terrorism to places like New York City or Munich ?? McVeigh was tried and convicted in the newsmedia. I was never convinced that McVeigh was actually guilty of bombing the Murrah Building. He was a patsy. McVeigh was lacking both the MEANS and the MOTIVE to pull off such a crime, whereas the REAL CULPRITS are probably related to the same criminals who pulled off 9-11 and the Waco massacre. The motive behind OKC was political, it was to demonize the home-grown militia movement and also to set the stage for 9-11 and the eventual imposition of martial law.
Don't get out much, do ya? Never heard of "Total Resistance-The Swiss Army Guerrilla Warfare Manual"? Written by a Swiss Army Major and guerrilla warfare expert for the Swiss Army. It is part of Swiss Army training. This book is/was THE book on such warfare. Read a little something other than your conspiracy theories and maybe you'd learn something about Swiss history, geography and why they believe they need to learn such things. Outrageous, indeed! What's outrageous is your lack of knowledge on the subject. Changing the parameters of the argument to suit your agenda, eh? This is what you wrote: Nothing written there about "exporting" terrorism or the other bs of words. Wow, you really are nuts!! LOL!! You wrote the French didn't blow shit up. I proved you wrong... that's all. Wasn't the question. You wrote nobody. Most emphatically with all caps!!! Damn, will you read a little fucking history before you spout. I'm getting tired of educating you. The IRA was hooked up with Black September, The Red Brigade, The Weathermen and other groups. Again, wasn't the question. That's a matter of opinion. There's nothing there based on fact. Means or motive? Did you know McVeigh? ROTFLMFAO!!!! You ARE a wingnut!!! OKC was '95, 911 was '01 and nearing 2010 and not a hint of martial law. PARANOIA!!! Bet you're a Birther, a Teabagger, a Death Panel believer and that man never went to the moon. Are the black helicopters hovering over your house while you grasp your weapons, MREs and ample supply of tin foil hats? What you really are is a bitter, self-loathing old man lashing out. You admitted attending Yeshiva...that tells it all. Fucking sad. Zen