A Logical Case for Anarchism

i dont thing that logically entails anarchy, for the exact same reasons I dont think abolishing the laws which say "it is illegal to spit while travelling on public transport" would lead to a rise in spitting on public transport

 

Your argument is just silly.

You're saying how you wish people would behave. This can not, and will not, be achieved, so it doesn't matter. Joe Blow is not mother theresa, and will steal your shit when you kid yourself that he is.

 

Although if you are mother theresa you are unlikely to get shit stolen from you.

 

Look, anarchy will only work if all members of such society are true anarchists. With no one wanting power, and the society "governing itself" the concept of power will eventually go away, until some one that is not anarchist comes along. We can say that anarchy is the ability of two little brothers being able to settle their own agreement with mom and dad interfering.

 

Social Progress:
from <the System of Reality> man nihilistic within That: to


Anarchism: Man existing wholly existentially for God the Creator.

back to <the System of Reality> man at the higher nihilism.