In a state of anarchy there needs to be militias. every group of people living communally together need a militia.
I've taken the same thing, but for the most part I've only experienced inaccurate information. Schoolbooks and classes won't do good when the teacher in question does not present you with accurate information.
Can all of the people here who are rigidly against anarchism and communism because they don't believe humans are capable of living without a centralised government do me a huge favour? THINK
Or they can just do a little research: http://www.hipforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=141313 Info is just a mouse click away.
Not real anarchists. http://infoshop.org/faq/secA1.html#seca14 Anarcho-capitalists are a different breed all together.
I totally agree with you but I am optimistic enough to say that the idea that "every person should have the right to choose his or her way of living" makes enough sense with a little thought. Thinking, its like the world's oil supplies. Quickly drying up.
i can only tell you what i believe, and that is that there is no moral madate for any form of soverign hierarcy. there is equaly none for causing harm or destroying anything and that honor is never served by vengence. the same diversity of reality that does nothing to prevent the rise of tyranny does equaly nothing to prevent its fall. and the we have a personal vensted interest in the avoidance of causing harm. hermits don't make wars it takes social organization to do that. social organization and the romantacizing and reawarding of aggressiveness. at worst, one person acting alone, can only beat one other person over the head at a time, no matter how big or bad they are. and most people have better sense then expect doing so to gain them any sort of real gratification. i'm not saying most people are all people, but togather we do influence the odds and it doesn't take any sort of formal soverignty to do so =^^= .../\...
