Personally I believe this whole theory to be a load of bullshit. When the woman orgasms her cervix opens to allow the semen to enter, so the more orgasms a woman has, the higher the probability of conception, making a mutual orgasm the most favourable. As for the notion of the latter penis scraping the preceding semen out, the penis never even gets as far as the semen reaches, regardless of penile size, not only because of where it is deposited, but because it is also drawn along towards the cervix by a peristaltic action, much like that of the bowel. Finally, the sperms, which are the real 'danger' here are so microscopically small, as well as being so numerous that no way could the penetration of another penis affect this - in fact, if anything, the forward thrust would be more likely to add to the progress that the previous sperm had already made by giving it a bit of backwash.
Mm, some good points even if the scientists disagree. The theory was derived from observing the genitals of male monkeys and primates, and how succesful they are at reproducing. But I can imagine that in such monkey communities there's a lot of extra-marital sex, so to speak. And thus the males need a type of tool to protect the semen they just deposited in the female they claim to be theirs. Not sure whether the theory applies to modern humans, who are perhaps less promiscuous. But the scientists say it does. I'm not a scientist, you're not a scientist, so it's difficult to debate this topic without ending up in pop-science.
Dear John. Not the modern humans on this forum! Why don't you check in on the thread concerning the largest dick these ladies have ever taken on. Your expertise is needed regarding whether a long thin dick if better than a short fat one. You are too modest regarding the scientist crap. You're a sexual scientist aren't you? Good to see you're still checking on the ladies as well. Are they your pictures?