Every post you made in this thread seems heavily based on subjective assumptions and cliché stereotypes, VG. Thought I just mention it (in case it isn't on purpose) Sometimes it seems you deliberately ignore what a person actually tries to say and jump to making a conclusion based on stereotypical generalisations right away. Is it only to try to sound witty or funny?
Was that in response to the previous post? He made the claim he knew the medical history of the majority of people he knows, you tell me how likely that is. So yes, did deliberately ignore such obvious bulldust. And I jump to the conclusion that he assumed that would work because she isnt a faithful little housewife that does what she's told, couldnt possible like being with a bunch of guys, must be being taken advantage of by them, so must be dumb....even though she's saying stuff like, why is the world so cruel to women that like to f***
Like I said you seem to be doing it in every post in this thread so far. As I read monkjr's post for example he seems to be saying the majority of the people he actually KNOWS (which can be read as that he doesn't actually knows everyones medical history, that's what you thought it would be smart or funny to assume ) had caught SOME KIND of std at some point in their life. Now, does someone really has to know their medical history for that in all cases?. You are the one that interpreted what he said as the claim you put forth. It's not his claim as far as I can see. Thanks for explaining. This is full of stereotypical jibberish as well. People have not really said she's dumb for liking being with a bunch of guys for instance, but about the way she seems to be handling and perceiving these 'friendships'. It's ok she doesn't want to be a housewife, but why write being a housewife like faithful, little and someone that always does as she's told? Is there nothing in between? Is it really helpful to paint things that black and white? It's not sure she is taken advantage of by them but all we can go on is what she wrote and she didn't wrote the OP (and other threads) for nothing, so it is understandable some are thinking in that direction.