Some schools of Buddhism seem to me to posit a great deal more than is 'evident' - Tantric Tibetan Buddhism for one example. Even in the story of the Buddha's enlightenment, supernatural supposed being appear, and there is much in the way of mythology, such as the Jakata stories etc. Christianity does not really say one can have no direct experience of God. In the Bible itself, and in the voluminous literature of Christian mysticism there is ample evidence of a living experience of God. This has been the experience of many Christians over the centuries, and still is today. As for Christian teaching placing more value on the afterlife than the here and now, Jesus said he came that his followers might have life 'more abundantly', and that He is a God of the living, not of the dead'. One could make a contrary assertion that Christianity has been and is more concerned to improve conditions in this world, whilst Buddhism is 'otherwordly' and seeks only an escape from the round of illusory existence into the absolute.
It depends on the brand of either religion, I guess. I'm not an authority on it, but aren't the Pentacostals a group that has some belief in the direct experience of God? They're probably the closest the Christians have to a mystic sect. One constant difference I think between the two religions is that Christianity tends to be dualistic while Buddhism is monistic. That is, Christianity generally espouses a belief in there being "another" world, in other words, Heaven and the spirit realm and all that. Buddhism on the other hand endorses a belief that there's just one world, "everything is one" sorta stuff, only that there are different ways of perceiving it or that there are levels of understanding to be transcended, so forth, so forth. At least that's my take, correct me if I'm wrong.
^^^^ yeah, that's pretty much what i thought, too. and campbell, people like you are the reason why so many people lose faith and interest in christianity. because of bible quoters who say anyone who does not follow jesus and follow through with every little demand he made, is a sinner. i, and many other people, don't want to be part of a religion that sets up such ridiculous rules to earn a place in heaven. sure, there should be certain rules. i don't think everyone should be allowed to run around and do whatever they want, but some of the "rules" of christianity are just pointless. why is pre-marital sex a bad thing? who is it hurting? no one. and as long as it doesn't hurt anyone, or anything, you should be allowed to do it. things like that turn me off from christianity, sorry. unless you're killing someone/something, or stealing from them, or causing them harm in anyway, where is the sin? i personally think jesus was just the original hippie, you know? he taught and practised the ways of peace and love, which extended to every living thing on the planet. i honestly don't think he ever asked for much, other than that. and i think people mis-interpreted his words along the way. i've seen first hand how things like gossip, can go from your mouth, to your friend's, to his friend's, and to a bunch of guys he "kinda knows." it gets twisted around, and people include/exclude things to benefit themselves more, or make the story more interesting. it's human nature, and i think that's what alot of the bible is. i mean, c'mon. correct me if i'm wrong, but apparently the time between when all the stuff in the bible happened, to when someone actually started writing down, was like thousands of years!! don't you think, as that story got passed down through the generations, that it got switched around a little? c'mon. c'moooooon! sorry. i'm not trying to insult you, or your beliefs. but, i would appreciate it, if you would respond in the same manner, and not call a figure i look up to as a "sinner." the buddha was a peaceful man, who never believed in forcing people to believe in his ways. he taught that you should leave people to their ways, and stay true to yours. nobody has to hate, just because they don't agree on their views on "God." whatever God is, we are all it's/his/her children, and we should just respect one another, for that. peace
There are many Christian mystical traditions associated with the Catholic and Orthodox churches, I don't think Pentecostals have any monopoly here. As for belief in other worlds, I am sure that Tibetan Buddhism teaches that there are many other worlds and planes of existence (see 'The Tibetan Book of the Dead').
Well, I follow many Christian, Hindu, and certain Buddhist views. My personal belief is that they piece together like a puzzle. They are philosophies that represent different spiritual aspects and realizations of God. Jesus helped me understand Krishna and the deites, then this helped me understand Buddha. On my spiritual journey, I have found that in the end they do not contradict each other, they simply add together. Most contradictions, in my opinion, are due actually only to cultural differences with language and misenterpretation. Jesus opened my heart to find what love really is. That is the spiritual realization of this ascended master also known as Sandana. I was enlightened with love by the Christ and upon this realization, I became saved by the Christ. Hinduism and aspects of Buddhism taught me that God has many names that all bring light to the same spirit and that God can return to this Earth in different bodies with different names. All the different philosophies reach out to us in different ways. Christ taught us that upon his realization we are saved from our sins and that love is the law. Krishna and the Hindu philosophies teach the same principle and they believe in Jesus' teachings. They teach us to concentrate upon ourselves and realize that God and the Holy spirit is within us and everything and that God is in fact distant and very personal simultaneously (within you without you). It has been said that Vishnu the preserver aspect of God descended to the Earth in the form of Krishna and Jesus to bring back the true discipleship of God. The Christian mystics who believed in the Perinneal Philosophy also believed this and Buddha was included with Jesus and Krishna in their teachings and beliefs. Buddhism extends Hinduism further with teachings of controlling our desires. Hindusim teaches that our desires our good and natural but we must control them and use them for good and pure use. Buddhism teaches neither complete satifactions or psychological suicide, rather a middle path as stated with the Eightfold Path. The Buddha taught me the supreme aspect of completeness and wholeness and the beautiful ecstacy of nirvana that we can achieve within oursleves and how to keep this peace. Hinduism and Buddhism also taught me about Tantra, Kama Sutra, and later the Tao and how to truely appreciate love making by bringing forth upmost pleasure to your lover and the both of you realizing the ecstacy and beauty within yourselves and uniting with the spirit. Some people find this same state through abstinance... it just depends on what works for you when they accomplish the same goal To sum this up Jesus helped me realize love, compassion, sympathy,open-mindedness and empathy. Hinduism helped me realize the supremeness of God and the spirit of God present within everything as well as finding truth within ourselves, the discovery of our mind's eye,the ability of God to appear in different times with different names on earth, and concentrating on our desires and balancing our nature, realizing Brahman and the Atman within me. the everpresent OM. The Buddha helped me realize inner peace and finding completeness in silence and the sounds that remain when all is silent...once again, the everpresent OM! Please forgive me if I have misenterpreted or mixed up anything. Please do not be offended by what I say, just remember this is only what I have found for myself, my personal views. I have enjoyed this thread Ben.
That was not me. My silly husband... I think the Buddhism has greater teachings. We are the nexus of God, we are God. It is through realization that we may achieve mind/soul union. JESUS WAS A BUDDHA, and enlightened master...I feel that Christianity, and do not follow the truth. The Bible has alot of ego tossed in there, such as revenge, murder, sexism...To me it is quite obvious that a mere man who was not of pure essence wrote this book. What Jesus represents in modern Christianity is off centered.
I understand and feel the same way as well. There are some strange contradictions/situations in certain places in the Bible, but I believe Jesus to be a Buddha and an incarnate of the Vishnu aspect of God. Peace, Ben.
There are probably quite a few people that wouldn't be hurt at all by pre-marital sex, but I think this was included in the Bible because a lot of people are. I have seen a lot of couples that got together, and after they had sex they stayed together for a long time even though they knew it was a bad relationship. And without pre-marital sex you would proabably not have to worry about your partner having an STD... feel like you should marry someone because you are pregnant... have to raise a child on your own... & things like that. Now, I am not saying these things are on the rise today or that everyone will have these consequences, but I think it is hard to say that pre-marital sex hurts no one. Sorry inbloom... I'm not trying to pick on you! But you did say to correct you if you were wrong The first Gospels were not written a thousand years afterwards... not even one hundred years. It was about 40 years ~ and so a lot of people were still alive that had seen everything. At first they thought that Jesus had meant he was actually coming back soon, and so they did not feel the need to write anything down. Not to say some things still could have gotten switched around, but it was not just passed down from on person to another.
even so, i've seen people who were actually there, during a certain situation i was at, and they totally change the story around when they're telling it to other people. why? to make themselves look better, or to gain some sort of acceptance from it. and besides that point, the original bible was written in ancient latin. a language hardly anyone has spoken for years and years...a language so lost, they had a very difficult time enterpeting alot of it. so, who's the say they didn't just misread alot of the bible? you know how someone can say one thing, when they actually mean a completely different thing? if they're being sarcastic, or speaking metaphorically, or just telling a joke. maybe the bible was the original fiction novel??? maybe someone was having an amazingly creative idea, and decided to write it down and make it available to people. and then, as i said before, it started to get misinterpreted, over time. it could be possible. things could've been said that weren't exactly true, or were taken differently than they were meant to be taken. i just don't think people should believe in something so blindly, such as a book, when it was created thousands of years ago, and the past on it is really shaky. that's just my opinion, though. it's just something to wonder about, you know?
What makes you think that Buddhism has any advantage here? I don't think the majority of Buddhist sutras were written in the lifetime of the Buddha, and the propensity of people to reconstruct their memories would apply as much with Buddhism as with Christianity. The greater part of the Bible was not written in Latin, but in hebrew and Greek. The Buddhist Scriptures are in Pali or Sanskrit. And there is no evidence to suggest that Buddhist Ideas have not become distorted over time in the same way you say has happened with the Bible.
I was just about to mention that! The Old Testament was written in Hebrew & the New Testament in Greek. But I do agree with what you were saying about translations because it is very hard to translate the full meaning of things. I do know a lot of Christians who go back & study Greek so that they can understand it even better. & I totally agree with you Inbloom that people should not believe in the Bible so blindly. I think even Christians should question if everything in the Bible is true.... automatically believing everything in the Bible is true without question requires the same amount of faith as automatically believing it is all false. When you questions something in the Bible you are more likely to actually think about the topic, do research on it, read the verses, talk to others & pray about it. I think there are a lot of Christians who never question anything & so they never learn what the Bible actually says.
As a Christian, I always thought of Buddhism as being 'The next closest thing' mainly because of the shared 'Premise' of the state of Mankind. That is to say, flawed and 'naturally' following the need for physical satisfaction through material ways. In a Nutshell - Pride. Well anyway.. Buddha would have us believe that we can each meditate away our sinful natures and reach a state of 'Salvation' from the decaying physical world. I simply dont agree. I go with Jesus plan on this - Since he is the One to have solved the problem, we can vicariously have victory 'through Christ'. (but not of ourselves). But nowadays, most young people are interested in Buddhism because they are highly conditioned and trained into a 'Consumer' world-view. They are choosing to identify themselves with the 'Buddha' product campaign because it 'Suits their lifestyle and image choice'. - They see Buddhism as a convenient way. Requiring no confessions or accountablility. No harsh 'definitions' to struggle with. A way to gain enough spiritual 'comfort' without having to really 'do' anything or stand for anything. And honestly - The Buddhists have done a remarkable job of promoting themselves. Plus its a 'Honeymoon' phase in North America for them. Interesting Topic!
I simply dont agree with what you said.Perhaps Christianity is more of what you said. That we can pray away our sinful natures and reach a state of "Salvation" from a decaying physical world. It is more than just meditation, it is also discipline. Controlling the ego, and compulsiveness. Realizing what and who you really are by removing the veils of illusionary preception of the world. It takes years and years of practice, understanding, and putting your heart/spirit into things. I believe/feel/know that Jesus is apart of us there for he is us. There is no seperateness. We can achieve what he has done through following his path of enlightenment and living simply without materialistic mindset. Helping others without return, giving and loving no matter what. Showing people that they are apart "GOD" they are "GOD" and they the power to do good. What you have seen was the silly consumer mindset on Buddha. A fad a phase, t shirts sold at trendy shops...silliness and more illusions. Buddhism is very very old and intense. It is false when you say that it requires no confessions or accountability. It is all about that. It is about diving into your essence and drudgin up all the confusions. Holding accountability for every single action, thought, and finding the root of it. It is like peeling away at an onion to find only at the center there is nothingness. And from this void all things are possible. They did not intend to promote themselves. It was yuppies and came to the quite monks and asia to learn the secret teachings. And it was the yuppies who did the promoting and the "popularity fit". I feel ill when I also see the yoga trend today. It is so ridiculous and nothing near The Yoga of Knowng the Mind. They are just in it for the cash, the blondes, and the celebrities...Anyway, Its the yuppies who bring monks today into America and stuff money into their own bank accounts. Look at places like sedona. A bunch of rich yuppie Americans making MILLIONS of dollars on something that a baby knows and has no price. Brocktoon, I reccommend that you take time to read a wonderful book. "The Tibetan Book of Living and Dying", it is also a great book for Christians as well. I think you would really enjoy it.
I could not agree with you more. Buddhism holds invaluable wisdom for Christians. And talk about harsh definitions and complexity...the Tibetan Book of the Dead is amazingly complex and beautiful. We can all learn from it. Ben.
Well, for starters....you'd rarely catch a Buddhist getting into an us vs them debate. Buddhists love to debate, but without the vs. The Bible is full of an eye for an eye stuff, killing, violence and the like. Buddhism teaches that these things create Karma, but in extreme circumstances, one may risk that Karma to save lives. Both Buddhism and Christianity have an enlightened being coming to earth at about the same time, but the followers took very different paths. Buddhists took great pains to keep the original/authentic teachings just that: authentic. The Bible has been tweaked and worked to benefit those in power over the ages. Buddhist teachings also benefit those in power, don't get me wrong, they just go about it differently. Christians are superohmygod attached, Buddhists are not, in theory at least. Christians seem to have the need to preach and convert...missionaries are a good example. Buddhists don't really care if you're a Buddhist or not. I could go on and on....I'm a recovering Buddhist and Christian, so I feel I've had some experience. I do, however, still rely on my Buddhist training, whereas I feel I need therapy for my Christian training. Interesting thread...thanks!! Madame Bambi
In my experiences through life I have come to conclude that christianity and buddhism both have it right.....the popular misconception is that the bible is taken too literally, its a guide book for a way to live a good life and nothing more. Jesus was a bodhisittva (spelling?) or a 'buddha in training' his teachings were almost exact to that of buddha's. Jesus said he was god incarnate....people took at too literal and say the son of god like we think of a father and son relationship today. to buddha we are all the son of god with the potential to be a buddha, if we listen to his message and live a pure life and free ourselves of our wordly desires and by studying the tibetan book of the dead we can better understand what he means when saying that...... Baba Ram Dass wrote a beautiful book explaining it in a really easy to follow way(and if you're into hallucinogens he compairs the psychedelic experience to it very well) its called Be Here Now and I couldn't emphasize the beauty this book possesses enough other good reads on the topic are the politics of ecstasy(T. Leary) The psychedelic experience (T. Leary, which is an interpretation of the tibetan book of the dead) oh yeah and for those who say buddhists don't have a God, I use the word god in refferance to the benevolant creator, the pure white light, the great energy force behind everything. atleast that is my interpretation
Quote At98BooBoo- "Christ took our place and died the eternal death that we were supposed to die. Christianity teaches that we are not saved and made better people by our own efforts but we are saved and made better people by claiming Christs victory over sin(grace) and by having a continuing relationship with Him." Why were we suppose to die an eternal death? You Christians (most of you who take all that dogma literally) always cling to this idea. I can't subscribe to a religion that's centered around some foolish notion that sounds like some control freak (not meaning Jesus) pulled out of his ass to scare people into joining "his" church. It's no wonder you Christians are always having a "crisis of faith" every time the shit hits the fan. Open you eyes. I have faith. Pure faith. I don't need someone to give me answers, or promises of streets of gold. I don't need to be frightened into being good. "GOD" is man made. Just have simple faith in "whatever made you" and find balance in your soul. BALANCE is the key to all things. I'm not affraid of death. I have real true faith, blind faith. How can you say you have faith if you're always looking for miracles and words of comfort from religious authorities. Break away and be one with all that is. Be what Jesus most likely REALY was. A simple man of faith, one with the spirit. Not the Jesus religion created.