you repeated everything he said with out any of your own words. that would be considered a demostration of "that" wouldnt it?
yes it would i guess, but i said this cadcruzer in posting 2# above: " i have posted this story but i cant vouch 4 its authenticity or reliability. having said that i hope, nay, i flail myself be4 the queen of the heavens, that it should be true. & after what i saw on fox tv 2day: the british mastermind of the london bombings is a plaything of mi6, i'm prepared to consider anything's possible..."
I'm saying you are twisting the poll. Saying Bush had forewarning is incredibly vague. I think Bush had forewarning, in the sense that there were clues that some sort of attacks were in the works. I don't think Bush knew about the planned attacks in a specific sense. Of course going back through the mountains of intelligence information and false alarms and with 20/20 hindsight selecting the "correct" clues, it looks like it could have been stopped. I think it is incredibly dishonest the way the 9/11 conspiracy movement has tried to inflate their support this way.
I am not sure if Bush knew about 9/11 myself...He might have, or might atleast have his own suspicion...that...compartmentalized lvels of certain intelligence agencies, and a small cabal of criminals involved with the military and the government were able to pull this off, Bush is just the figurehead for the PNAC document that states all their plans...
Several thousand people were suing the government over taxes because they said they objected to how their tax money was spent... but that never made the news... I saw it on CSPAN... Don't you think that should be on CNN?
ok, so u've told me what u think. u haven't presented any kind of argument where u might cite figures, or analyse the poll question to suggest it's misleading. none of that. it's just ur opinion. well excuse me but i'll think 4 myself thanks.