Casey Anthony Did Not Kill Her Child and What the Defense Alleges is Entirely True

Apparently she won't even do jail time. Whether she physically murdered her child, or "allowed" her to die due to neglect, she should still be found guilty of contributing to her daughter's death.

 

I don't think she killed her child but she knows who did and she wanted it to happen and she helped hide the body

 

They found her not guilty of First Degree Murder ... I felt the testimony of her Dad and her reaction showed something was amiss there & she had no love or remore for him.

The fact that she knew she was dead and did nothing about it is truly odd and perhaps nothing we will ever know.

 

what a waste of time.. Well, least someone made tons of money off the case.. Commercials and Nancy fuck face..

 

GOOD.

I have no doubt that she killed her daughter. She seems a rather nasty person.

But I also haven't seen any proof she killed her daughter.

 

The thing is, there's no law requiring specific emotional reactions (especially for one put on the spot like she has been) and the fact that you think someone should act some way when they don't or should be emotional about things when they're not or should call the police when they don't, may make her a horrible person, may make her seem guilty, but doesn't prove a damn thing.

 

Exactly!!
Why do people have such a hard time understanding this?

 

understanding it and agreeing with the verdict are two different things

common sense needs to be added to the justice system

 

The people I've been speaking w/ have the attitude that they heard enough evidence in what they saw in TV and read in the papers to be very confident her guilt has been proved.

Absolutely amaziing.

 

nancy grace isnt a Judge or Jury..

 

Im confident she is guilty too...but it definitely wasn't proven in that courtroom

both sides did a great job...the prosecution just didnt have enough evidence to work with

 

maybe someone will date rape drug her in a bar and forget her in the trunk


wouldnt that be ironic

 

No.

Because common sense is subjective.

Law must be strictly objective, because if it's subjective, it's wholly up to the people enforcing it. Common sense tells me (and still would, if I was a cop) who has a sack of pot in their pocket. And common sense ALMOST lets them search everyone right now, we don't need it more based on common sense, either on the street or in the court room.

Common sense sounds great when it's on your side, but it's also a ticket to anything anyone in power can make sound vaguely sensible.

 

you're right..I am biased because common sense is always on my side

 

Eh what's done is done

 

Bitch gets sentenced tomorrow. Hopefully the judge will give her the max 4 years for false info and hopefully the trashy useless **** will get shanked before she gets out.

 

Her karma will kick in soon. In 20 years she'll be toothless and delivering blowjobs to herpes-ridden losers for a $5 hit of crack.

 

I don't doubt it.

If she gets 4 years for false info, the entire prosecution should get 4 years for attempting to derail the justice system and break down the protections built into it, and for a massive unplanned waste of time without the evidence they needed.

They knew what they had for evidence, they knew the requirement for evidence, and they knew the damn good reasons for this requirement. So there's no fucking excuse for setting up a massive show trial if you don't have that evidence. They tried to get the jury to bend the rules based on emotion, and I'm very glad the jury didn't.