Casey Anthony Did Not Kill Her Child and What the Defense Alleges is Entirely True

Yes well seeing they had NO DNA EVIDENCE LINKING HER DIRECTLY TO THIS,im not surprised she got off!! (Thats how things are in this country )

 

I hate that bitch......fucks up my morning with her 10 o clock spot tv show.

 

convicted in media is not convicted in court.. ha. Maybe nancy will show up at the tramps release and shot her screaming .. "YOU RUINED MY CAREER",..

 

Hehe i know..... It should have been kept exclusivly on Tru TV!

 

They should of kept her in msnbc.

 

This hurts to say, but nancy grace would be better in the court room, pushing malicious, frivolous prosecutions, than on national TV, making thousands or millions of people advocate malicious prosecution with no evidence, while feeling like they're taking advice from a qualified legal expert.

 

Casey will be released on wednesday


I would normally never say this but I hope she kills herself

 

People who say shes not guilty are crazy, Shes guilty!! maybe not of murder, but of neglect, i mean if your 4 year goes missing you dont wait a month do report it som fishy shit right there. The trail was dragged out and exagrated to keep us occupied on stupid shit while bigger shit is goin down in the world!

 

Guilty as hell - Jury verdict or not I have a right to my opinions. Innocent people are thrown in jail all the time - and guilty people are released all the time. But we're talking about a baby here. What mother has no idea where her child is and lies for months while she parties. Lies to her parents, to police, to friends - and the hot bod contest goes on. She's with Nanny Zanny - bullshit - she was dead and Casie knew it. And the party was on.
They put blinders on race horses so they won't be distracted by what is going on all around them. The jury was blinded - they could not see the elephant with it's foot on Little Callie.
Miscarriage of justice. And God will handle this is not enough.

Callies mother - MOTHER - is that what your mother would do??

 

If you guys are so sure that she did it, why didn't you give your knowledge and proof to the prosecution so they make sure "justice is done"? You didn't because you have only what the media provides. We don't know the whole story, even though the media has been crawling over it like flies on honey.

 

yeah right man, she'll be blowing rails up her nose and bragging to what's left of her friends about in which way she's gonna bag the next one....

lmfao no pun intended

 

why the fuck is this case such a big deal?

I get why OJ was.. being a celeb, EVERYONE wanted to see his ass go down. But this Casey Anthony shit happens all the time. Why did this blow up so big?

I also don't get why everyone is so thirsty for her blood.. My best guess is that they want someone to pay for the cute little girl's death, and if Casey doesn't pay.. no one will. Either that or they just think whatever the media tells them to. (I hope its the first one.. I can at least sympathize with that one)

Since when do we have such a mob mentality? People are still freaking the fuck out and I half expect her to get lynched.

I admit, I was only sort of paying attention to the case.. And the evidence was kind of disturbing, but not enough to convict someone of first degree murder. They should definitely been able to make a case for child neglectment though, and I don't know how the hell she got away with that.

I am not convinced she did it.. and I don't know why everyone else is. I would much rather someone get away with murder than an innocent person get convicted. I don't know why people were so expectant of a different verdict. "Maybe" isn't enough to convict someone of first degree murder. Hell, "probably" isn't either.

People need to calm the fuck down, and realize that the justice system doesn't revolve around their speculations.

 

Somewhere in Central Florida - 12 villages are missing their idiots.

 

The value of distraction- focus the entire herd on an isolated atrocity and orchestrate the pent up release of outrage leaving little time or energy to follow up on what the REAL criminals are doing in government that will affect your life a fuck of a lot more than a brutally murdered little girl in Florida. Perpetrating national significance from something that has none but involves gruesome and brutal acts against a young child can establish a premise where those who have the unmitigated audacity to be more concerned with the treasonous bankster-puppet thugs who are selling out the future of the country can be called out as callous and uncaring about children. I suspect that this was Nancy Grace's purpose- a role she fit splendidly.

The bonus to this is the near certainty that "law and justice" nut jobs can be given a platform to advocate lynch mob in retaliation- brandishing among other things, their dark ages mentality and "expertise" on legal matters so that a hard record can be kept of the common man's unfitness to be treated as anything but dumb cattle in the grand scheme of things. In short, it's just one more way that we're all being played. Next up on the distraction hit parade, Roger Clemens on trial because steroids in baseball is a far more important issue than government parceling out our economic sovereignty and participating in bubble-oriented investment schemes whose very design ensures that a significant number of innocent people are ruined financially.

"Not guilty" is probably just too damned delicious an outcome for them because it ensures a protracted and heated debate on how Casey Anthony deserves to be used for military target practice. I'd wager one or two within the corporate consortium that is the United States Federal Government are giving thanks to whatever caricature of a deity who holds the lien to their mortal soul for granting them such cover to continue raping the middle class.

I'm sure that once this fades into obscurity something else will be dragged out and tirelessly paraded before the swarm of insects known as the American public to help distract and divert them from what really matters... perhaps some excoriating questions from a senate panel- grilling the CEOs of private jet companies of why they are taking drugs away from seniors or some class-warfare baiting nonsense intended to placate us into actually believing that the lying pieces of traitorous shit give a flying fuck about any one of us- apart from tricking us into voting for them when the time comes...

So- yeah, she should get the electric chair and ottoman simply because I'm 137.3% convinced that she is guilty as sin... I shall give daily demonstrations of my outrage by screaming barely decipherable obscenities while angrily shaking my fists in the air continuously- except to wipe the foam of hysteria from the corners of my mouth.

 

It would really be nice if she was lynched, and then nancy grace was charged in the strongest way possible with inciting murder, defamation, and anything else possible.

I can dream :2thumbsup:

to the sentiments expressed above: it became such a big deal for two reasons: it's a great distraction, making some totally unimportant ho-hum case with a prosecutor who's not qualified to wipe his own ass, with no proof at all, in a very emotional case, national news really turns people away from all the US sanctioned MASS systematic murders and the like.

And the other reason, of course, was to make nancy grace a career, and get her a crazy cult following the likes of dr. phil or some other such TV quack. People like hearing imagination-based mob psychology on TV, passed off as statements from a legal expert. She makes stupid people feel better about their violent mob-driven tendencies, by CLAIMING to be smart and still support this stupid shit.

And if she had lost, it would have been just fine, they would have set AWFUL precident allowing the execution of just about anyone who was ever socially awkward, a bit of a slob about their automobile, and had an interest in chloroform or breaking necks. And now she won, which is nearly as good for them, because it will REALLY stretch out the diversion's length and value.

I wonder how many of these would-be-lynchers have seen the collateral murder video, or even know what it is? Shooting a handful of cameramen and children with gunships and then covering it up isn't a big deal, but killing ONE child is a big deal? Strange.... maybe it's because this child was white? No, I know the problem, it's those fuckers, assange and manning.... better support palin in calling for assange's official assassination, and waterboard manning some more before he dies of "natural causes" in custody.

 

There isn't enough time in the world to explain what is wrong with this. Casey should rot in jail. You don't go without reporting your kid missing for like a month. No fucking excuse.

If my nephew disappeared and I couldn't find him after five minutes, I would call the police. And if I tried to kill a kid, I'd still call the police so it looks like I didn't do it. Casey is just a dumb murderer.

 

That she may be.

But there's no proof she is.

There could have been enough crime to put her away if the prosecutor didn't make a bid for national notoriety, and charged her with a crime that he had the right to charge her with, and that he had the evidence for. Lieing to investigators, criminal child negligence, abuse, with her OWN admission, concealing her child's death by neglect.....

There's SO much she is guilty of. But murder is not a part of it, and should not be a part of it, until it can be proven.

 

So, then why was she not found guilty of those things (in the 2nd sentence)?! Only the lying! Still, I find this incomprehensible...and I hope to God the jurors are receiving all the publicity/noteriety etc they so richly deserve. Needless to say, I agree with LaP on this...there isn't enough time (nor space) to say all the actual technical things about this case that are wrong to the bone.

Also, in order to find someone guilty of a crime doesn't it have to be within a "reasonable doubt"...not NO doubt, not beyond the shadow of a doubt; but "within a reasonable doubt" mother murdered her daughter?

 

It could be determined from my google results, lack of police-reporting, and innapropriate emotions that I personally killed the flying spaghetti monster, beyond a reasonable doubt.... Doesn't mean I did it. But once the world reads this, pastafarians everywhere will be out for my blood.

It's still got to be proven.

I see exactly why the jury didn't return with those, but returned with the lieing one.

Because if she not ONLY got off free, but had been imprisoned for 3 years, she would sue the state, and legally, she would win. I haven't kept up since the not guilty, but I assume she got time served on those.

The reason they didn't add a whole bunch of charges was because the prosecutor didn't ask for those, at all, he instead tried to ignore the real evidence, and use emotions in his speech asking the jury to bend the rules. The rules must be bound in iron, to be any good. If the rules may be bent when it's determined obviously okay, then "obvious" is only as good as the people in power. Setting a precedent that could be used to imprison or execute innocent people for the sake of a girl who won't be brought back to life would NOT be a good choice.

And yeah, a lot of it was a "fuck you" to the prosecutor, for being such a presumptuous dick. When random people call for casey's conviction, that's one thing, they're not prosecuting attorneys. But he should most certainly know this was not something he had the evidence for a conviction for. His main point in the closing statement was "casey's a liar". Well okay, but you can't convict someone of murder because you can prove they're a liar.

Again, one thing the prosecution proved beyond all reasonable doubt is that one way or another, casey is a horrible person, who deserves nothing but disdain from all. But they did NOT prove her a murderer, and as such, she can not be convicted as one.

If I was on the jury, I'd say the same thing: let's not TOUCH any serious convictions that would vindicate this prosecutor's attempt to set a precedent here, but let's ALSO hit her with enough that her time served has not been wrongful, to avoid vindicating her in that manner.

WHY are all these christians and the like calling for the execution or lifetime of incarceration of a criminally insane very likely histronic and otherwise psychotic ex-mother? It wouldn't bring her daughter back, but it would wound the credibility of the legal system, could cause other innocent people to die as a result of that, and COULD even cause THIS innocent person to die. No proof means we don't know that she's guilty. Innocent people have been executed with "proof" before.

How can it even possibly make sense to kill someone to make the example that killing is wrong? AND how can it make sense to kill someone to make them suffer, if revenge is your deal? you don't suffer when you're sleeping with the worms...


*edit* also, I personally think that it's very likely that if the prosecutor hadn't been stupid, and had charged her with a slew of things that he actually had the evidence for, she could have been put in repeated positions to confess to murder, and that she would have accidentally done it. He's just all around a nasty, incompetent man....

*edit2* Here is a video of 12 people being murdered and 2 children being seriously injured. And the man who told the world, the man who's picture is under my name, has been tortured for doing the right thing and exposing it, for a very long time that will surely end up being a much longer time. And this kind of thing happens EVERY DAY, in our illegal undeclared wars around the world. WHERE IS YOUR RAGE?

[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=to3Ymw8L6ZI

*edit3* whole post is not directed at lynn or anything, not singling you out, just the first bit.

 

Look-let's face it. If Casey Anthony hadn't been able to afford a high-class legal team that was able to bumfuzzle the jury under the media spotlight, she'd be sitting on death row right now. I'm not in favor of the death penalty, don't get me wrong. I'm saying that people (poor people with court appointed lawyers) in murder cases have been convicted with evidence that's a lot more circumstantial than this. It just shows that justice is basically for sale in America, especially if the media is watching.