Circumcision could Become mandatory

Ok what's happening is when you wash your clothes and jocks and whatever, the chemicals are going into you glands as it rubs and does whatever it does in your pants. This constant rubbing desensitizes the honest and true feeling that uncut men have.

Pros/cons.

Pro: You probably last longer in bed
Con: You probably don't feel the intensity and sensations that uncuts do.

 

That sounds more like the list of a guy who's uncircumsized and wants to tell people that it's "better".

The foreskin has twelve known functions.
They are:
1.to cover and bond with the synechia so as to permit the development of the mucosal surface of the glans and inner foreskin.
2.to protect the infant's glans from feces and ammonia in diapers.

This is the reason actually that people get their children circumsized, to prevent infection. Those things can build up under the skin and cause infection. If their are just on the surface of a circumsized baby then they can be wiped clean

3.to protect the glans penis from friction and abrasion throughout life.

Friction's a bad thing?

4.to keep the glans moisturized and soft with emollient oils.

Maybe, sounds a bit sketchy though


5.to lubricate the glans.
6.to coat the glans with a waxy protective substance.

lol. What?

7.to provide sufficient skin to cover an erection by unfolding.

I don't understand this? The extra skin covers an erection by unfolding? Why does an erection need to be covered?


8.to provide an aid to masturbation and foreplay.

lol. Fail


9.to serve as an aid to penetration.

Fail

10.to reduce friction and chafing during intercourse.

Fail. Unless you're fucking a bag of sand then the penis doesn't need friction reduction

11.to serve as erogenous tissue because of its rich supply of erogenous receptors.

Hardly. It's a skin flap

12.to contact and stimulate the G-spot of the female partner.

Now that is funny. Also BS. So where are all these sexually satisfied wives of uncircumsized men then?

 

theres an Idea ... Stuff a sheep pussy full of sand.. Listen try and stay on topics mks..

 

I'm sorry, but my Bullshit detector was going off the charts...




You also didn't post any article or anything for us to discuss. Are we to just discuss circumcision becoming mandatory theoretically? Where did you hear this?

TheDope's answer was the best

 

Yes.

No seriously this is true.

See above

Your penis was not meant to droop around bumping and grinding and rubbing against your underwear that has been washed with washing chemicals.

You should look into male yeast and fungai infections.

Wrong. Again.


This was just pure ignorance to your own gender.

 

im sorry ,, I did so post an artical.. If you have noticed im deleting all my post in the section..

Seem like the mod here wants to get on my nuts and dick .. for petty shit.. Sheep fuckers Rule this section of hip forum..

 

The topic of the article is simply untrue.

 

If it didn't it'd be too small to do anything with.

No it wasn't. It was the truth. Foreskin is a flap of skin that wraps around the penis. The truth is never ignorant. It can't be ignorant of itself.

Also, I doubt many guys really care what anybody says about the penis'.

You seem to know a lot about this considering you don't have a penis. Speculation never gets very far.

 

No your whole rant of "fail, fail, fail, untrue, fail, fail" was ignorance to your own gender.
Your involvement in this thread indicates you're one of the guys that does care.
I studied sports medicine at university. I'm well aware of what the human body is and what it's capable of doing. There are a surprising amount of groin injuries in sport.

 

And do groin injuries include dick chaffing due to no foreskin?

Look, I have dick, it's in good shape, never chaffed, never infected, never poisoned, injured, never has been any of these. I speak from personal experience as the owner of a dick. You speak on behalf of groin injuries and sports medicine. Mmkay.

 

And you might not end up with cancer, doesn't mean it ain't there, man.
So speak from your ignorant experiences. ie. yourself. one.single.experience and I'll speak of my educated experiences. =)

 

how does your dick rub against your clothes/.. I dont wear pants..

 

How is the fact that I've never had any penis problems ignorant experience to speak from?

Wait a minute...is this penis envy talking?

 

Just because you've never experienced any problems with your gear doesn't mean the problems are not present or "fail" or false. It just means you're lucky enough to have not had any /yet/.

So I find your comments ignorant.

"I have no problems so they don't exist and every statement as to why men are born with foreskin must be false because I don't have a problem."

 

Yea fair enough, you have a point. Some of them still sound pretty bogus though.


I'm gonna go play with my dick now.

 

http://www.aidsnews.org.il/

 

Prevention in Africa. Lol, who cares?

 

And this would be the lubrication under the foreskin that Luna said was rubbish. Male fungai and yeast infections are common with uncut males because the skin creates a warm, moist environment, exactly how it's supposed to. The bad side to this is it can trap in diseases if not cleaned properly. Not cleaning in Africa doesn't strike me as out of the normal.

 

I've been circumsized since before I had a memory.

That said, I've always wondered what it feels like to get head with the foreskin on.
Something I'll never know.