Climate Change

FDR should have told us about his secret deal to let Pearl Harbor happen in order to boost our economy by getting us involved in the war. And there’s a problem if there’s secrets and coverups going on WITHIN the Pentagon. People in the Government can’t even account for these funds. But again, this is getting off topic…

 

I don't know which " ..." of mine you're quoting, but that's what I use if for some reason I need to abort a post. I assume it's the latest: post 263. The statement about getting a climate change paper published was by Piney. I assume he isn't P.T. Brown writing incognito. BTW, what's your point???

 

Really? To boost our economy? Source???

 

…

 

How old are you kid? This theory has existed for decades and decades

 

"Theory"? Lots of conspiracy theories have existed for decades. My grandma told me FDR didn't die when they said he did but was actually transferred to a mental institution. I just told you my source for that one. What's yours? You seem to be long on theories, short on sources.

 

Short on sources *minus the Climate Scientist who just validated all my points*

 

Here’s one of many sources. But like I said this is getting way off topic Do Freedom of Information Act Files Prove FDR Had Foreknowledge of Pearl Harbor? | Robert B. Stinnett

 

My question wasn't about FDR's foreknowledge of Pearl Harbor but the theory that he withheld the info to boost our economy by getting into a war. From which of your many sources did you get that one?

 

Do your own research bro. Do you ACTUALLY have any interest in this possibility or are you just being petty for the sake of it? Ever heard of the Great Depression? We were in it during that time period. It’s largely acknowledged that our involvement in WW2 contributed to boosting our economy out of this.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/busi...2dfb72-4e36-11ee-bfca-04e0ac43f9e4_story.html
Factcheck: Scientists pour cold water on claims of ‘journal bias’ by author of wildfires study - Carbon Brief
Editor of Nature journal slams climate scientist Patrick Brown's 'highly irresponsible' research after he said publications reject studies that don't 'support certain narratives' | Daily Mail Online

 

Yes I’m aware that CNN and Washington Post and legacy media are gonna attempt to “debunk” this guy and will likely ruin his career now. Literally the most predictable thing ever dude…

 

I ask you for sources for a claim and you tell me to Do my own research? That's not the way it works in scholarship. If you make a claim, it's up to YOU to do your own research to support it, and to report where you got the info, so readers can check it if they have questions about it. It's acknowledged that W.War II boosted the U.S. out of the depression. Where you fall short is in supporting your contention that FDR withheld information about the Japanese invasion of Pearl Harbor for the purpose of boosting the economy. That's a serious charge.

 

Case closed

 

I already know that any source I provide won’t matter at all. You have proven that over and over already.

I know when I’m talking to open-minded people and when I’m not. If you actually had an open mind to various possibilities, maybe I would be more accommodating. Instead you and MeAgain are just looking to counter every point I make.

You’re not taking me seriously so I’m not taking you seriously. “sOuRcE bRo?” with an air of cynicism isn’t worthy of me taking your inquiry seriously. This is at best intellectual entertainment for me.