Corporation for Public Broadcasting shut down

Why not?
The Republican party has only existed since 1854.
When the nation was formed the founding fathers for the most part were highly educated for their time and "white collar"..and were liberals.
Hamilton and John Jay went to King's College (Columbia), Jefferson went to William and Mary, Madison attended the College of New Jersey (Princeton), Adams and Hancock went to Harvard and 35 out of the 55 delegates who attended the Constitutional Convention were lawyers.

Black Lives Matter Activists Commandeer Sanders Speech In Seattle

Sanders gives rally after demonstrators disrupt earlier speech

Anyway, does PBS make a lie of omission when they fail to report that Trump is a convicted felon and sexual predator at everyone of his events?

I can't find anything to support this claim. Please list the source.

Same here, I can't find anything to support this claim. Please list the source.

Please define "wokeness" for me and give me PBS examples that I can find on the net so that I can see what you are talking about.

Please define "liberal" for me.

PBS Bias and Reliability

 

Lots to unpack here.......

Circular reasoning maybe?
I agree college educated white collar workers are, by definition, college educated and therefore their views are influenced by being educated and informed.
I am merely pointing out that highly educated people were not always conservative in the past.

Yes, those kind.
The founding fathers were classical liberals. That is they rebelled against royal authority, tradition, and absolute rule by the state.
Slavery has had a long history with mankind going back to early civilization. The same with a lack of women's and LGBTQ rights and the rights of land owners.
Just becasue the Fathers didn't correct every negative social issue on day one doesn't mean they weren't liberal and mostly highly educated for their time.
The U.S. Constitution is based on the Enlightenment and philosophers such a John Locke, the "father of liberalism."
Again, I am merely pointing out that highly educated people were not always conservative in the past.

 

Thanks for that.
In that segment about Trump's comment about Megan Kelly "HAVING "BLOOD COMING OUT OF HER EYES, BLOOD COMING OUT OF HER WHEREVER." they stated that Trump clarified his statement by saying,
"THE NEXT DAY HE SAID HE MEANT BLOOD COMING OUT OF HER "NOSE."
And then they devote some time to his web site and his stance on certain issues.

You seem to have an issue with their priorities in this hour segment.
They covered protests and a state of emergency in St. Louis and Ferguson, the Philippines, Ebola, bombings in Iraq, Turkey, and Afghanistan, an attack on the U.S. Consulate in Istanbul, migrants in Greece, a disaster in Colorado, the Dow Jones, Hillary Clinton, Trump, Lindsey Graham, children and religion, a call for funding, ...and Bernie Sanders.
A lot to go over in an hour.
But if you wanted them to mention a few minutes of Sanders' rally as being more important than all the above..okay.

 

Again thanks for the source.
So the paintings in question depict the uprising of slaves against those who kidnapped and enslaved them, their trial for murder, and their exoneration.
Why are you focusing on the color of the people in the paintings? It depicts a rebellion of slaves against slave holders. Who cares about their color or race?
It was broadcast during Black History month, and depicts brave individuals fighting for their human rights...and you want PBS to talk about the paint and composition of the picture like it's a picture about dogs playing poker?

This is why I asked for your definition of liberal.
If you think "praising" a painting that depicts an uprising by slaves against slave holders is to "liberal" for you then I wonder if you think that anytime the media reports that a slave, of any color, fought or is fighting for freedom from slavery that that media is bias.

 

They are according to Pew Ressearch.

I don't think I said that.
What I am saying is that highly educated adults have greater critical thinking skills, are more open minded, are more accepting of diversity, etc., than those without college education.
PBS at least attempts to educate, be inclusive, and "express a diversity of perspectives."
College educated people are attracted to PBS becasue of those values, PBS is not leaning left to attract them.

2025 - 25 is 2020, 2025 - 40 is 1985.
How did you reach this conclusion?
In 1984 Reagan won largely due to southern whites, as a whole, and northern blue-collar workers.

I'm not the one describing the Founding Fathers as liberal.
America’s Founding Fathers Were Liberals
Liberalism takes on many forms, the Fathers were Classical Liberalists, they believed in social and individual rights, small government, and a free market.
They were conservative in the belief of a small central government and a free market, but liberal in the most important area which was a liberation from conservative monarchical and religious backed government and lack of individual rights; as the fathers espoused in the Declaration and Constitution.
Today's ultraconservatives are anti individual rights; John Birch, neo Nazis, George Wallace, the Alt Right, Proud Boys, etc. and they promote "Christian Nationalism"; the Ten Commandments in public buildings, teaching Biblical "history" in public schools, laws based on Christian teaching, etc.
The fathers would not have accepted government based on a religion, nor were they anti individual rights for their time.

Not Going Conservative, Study Finds : Today’s College Frosh as Liberal as Those of ‘60s
Again you are proclaiming as fact that PBS tailors its output toward college educated white collar workers and not that college educated white collar workers are attracted to the output of PBS, which merely tries to be non bias.

Well, that's your opinion. I wouldn't call it scrubbing, i would call it prioritizing. You think this was the most important event in the world tht day, PBS had only limited time and focused on other news items.

Glad I didn't disappoint you!
PBS was talking about an art tour in Washington D.C.featuring the artist Hale Woodruff and the showcasing of his paintings in the Smithsonian Institute. They depict a historical event. Art can't depict an historical event?
PBS can't report on historical events being depicted in artwork?
Would you object to PBS shining a spotlight on Emanuel Leutze's Washington Crossing the Delaware as it's not an historical document?

British soldiers slaughtering Zulus with Gatling guns is not the same as freemen taken as slaves revolting.
The Anglo-Zulu War started when Sir Bartle Frere issued an ultimatum to the Zulu King Cetshwayo which effectively demanded the end of the independent Zulu Nation. When King Cetshwayo rejected it the British invaded a sovereign country.
Trayvon Martin was shot as he was walking in a public area by a "volunteer Neighborhood Watch person" as the result of an altercation becasue he looked suspicious. If the "volunteer Neighborhood Watch person" would have minded his own business Martin would not have been shot. No slaves were involved.
Micheal Brown was shot during an altercation with a police officer, no slaves were involved.

Why do you equate these incidences with people trying to escape slavery?

 

Glad you're back.

So i loaded the Pew article that I referenced into MS Word and did a search for the word "inherently". It doesn't appear in the article.
What are you referring to?

Here's a few:
These conservatives are making a case for clean energy
Is empathy a sin? Some conservative Christians argue it can be
What’s behind a growing rift between conservative U.S. Catholics and the Vatican
Economic Conservatives Hunt for Likeminded Candidate

I don't think I ever said that educated people weren't or can't be or conservative.
The study you referenced was very good, thanks for that. But remember it only addresses the voters, not the general public.

Reagan won partly due to a poor Democratic selection and message.
Although Reagan did get a landslide victory the Republicans lost two seats in the Senate and failed to gain a majority in the House.....

You are correct, I picked a bad example. Reagan won the voting public, but that doesn't prove your contention that college educated people are less liberal than no college educated as only about half the nation even voted and only 61% of the 52% voted for him.
You have proved that Reagan won and he got a majority of the college educated that voted.

You claim PBS is biased and is promoting "Wokeness" I guess. Am I wrong?
Have you forgotten Firing Line which was hosted for 30 years by the ultra conservative William F. Buckley Jr. and is now hosted by conservative political commentator Margaret Hoover? Or Tucker Carlson: Unfiltered hosted by conservative Tucker Carlson?
How about Shields and Gigot, featuring the conservative Paul Gigot?

Am I?
I'll just list one example:
Pete Hegseth Reposts Video of His Pastor Criticizing A Woman’s Right To Vote

 

Just to be clear, I don't know what's missing, and I didn't delete anything you posted.

Well the first one I listed references the Young Conservatives for Energy Reform, a conservative group, and Senator Mike Rounds, R-South Dakota.
The second references Allie Stuckey, an American conservative with a podcast called Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey and is owned and distributed by Blaze Media, Blaze Media was founded by Glen Beck, and Dr. Joe Rigney who preaches that empathy (read wokeness) is a sin.
The third talks about the conservatives who dislike the policies of Pope Francis.
The fourth talks about conservative fiscal efforts to find a candidate who supports conservative polices such as non-defense-related discretionary spending, cuts to capital gains taxes and corporate tax rates, corporate tax loopholes, and limited government.

So in these examples PBS is reporting on various conservative points of view, some social, some not.
Now, if you feel that PBS should be promoting socially conservative point of view, not just reporting them, then it would seem to me that you want PBS to be bias in that you feel it should promote certain views, not just report them..

Buckley founded the National Review, the magazine that made Conservatism respectable.
He argued against multiculturalism and atheism, he wrote a book defending Senator Joseph McCarthy, supported Ronald Reagan, opposed federal civil rights legislation, etc.
Not conservative enough for you?

Here's one:

​

So what is the time that's required for PBS to air a conservative show? Thirty three years wasn't enough for Buckley and seven years and counting isn't enough for Hoover's show and the conservative show In Principle. Who should they be airing and for how long?

I agree Carlson is a Kremlin sock puppet, like a certain other republican I could name.