Crisis in Iraq

But listen, American Terrorist, ISIS has nothing against a Law telling them to got to Work. The point is that going to Work is considerably to them against the law, and they wish the law would arrest them for what the present mischief is about, not for the working out of the communications standards as they are. In Iraq the priorities of the law are to make loving marriages and relationships illegal to the consideration of the globalized standards that true justice mindedness would mean. So fine, instead, make the point real for action of people be noted that they hinder the human rights of good business's, not profiteering one's.

ISIS is itself about money laundering and profiteering.

 

Pardon?

 

I'm not going to bring up a copy of remarks and articles from the Guardian. Might the world have been different for these crumby alliances forming; if let's say George Bush forged ahead and made a detente with Ahmedinejad right after 9/11.

Should be a great movie. "The re-incarnarnation of Osama Bin Laden."

Of course, we wouldn't wish to see it at the Rivoli. We'd have to catch it on an Android outside Hyde Park. What's the matter?

 

Yea I'm trying to get at what you're saying... but I'm not quite there...?

 

I'm not actually reading them.

 

Actually, Your statements are so confusing I do NOT know what you mean. You have a way of twisting anything you or anyone else says into mumbo jumbo that truly is incomprhensible. But the people here seem to like it with your high ratings. Those green things after your web name. It does seem to me many people in this forum prefer vague, meaningless tripe to reality. Very much the same as being on some mind numbing drug.
Be grateful there are still some out there including the Marine Corps keeping people such as you somewhat safe. But with Obummer as POTUS even that is a lot less than it used to be. ...Oscar

PS: Yes I was a US MARINE and did a lot of REAL fighting protecting you dickheads. I would NEVER join the Marines under Obummer`s command.

 

Heck, even I have no idea what I meant there.
Maybe that you might spend too much time trying to disagree with me.
But, who knows.

Most of my green thingies are because generally I am not a **** and I do make sense.
Heck, I may even make a few people laugh from time to time.

You understood my earlier post so it cant be all mumbo jumbo can it?

Keeping me safe? I know I am supposed to believe this, but I never have worked out how that worked - especially Vietnam.

 

He's not even in the US.... So... Yea...

 

Well, you guys do protect the entire world from the Vietcong, so...

 

lol.

But... you guys? I don't recall ever protecting the world from the vietcong or...anybody.

 

The Vietnam war was a continuation of of a very aggressive campaign by the Soviet Union and eventually RED CHINA to take over the World as clearly stated by Stalin, Kruschev and by the time of the Vietnam war Mao. Five short years after WWII the USSR supported invasion of South Korea took place and to this day has not ended.
The Vietnam war bought the Western Nations the time required to create DETENTE with the USSR and Red China. A necessary show of a willingness to REALLY fight was required to accomplish that in Vietnam. The Cuban missile crisis and other smaller wars in Africa are other examples.
Happily the USA and Vietnam are no longer enemies. You either had to have lived through these events or have been exposed to some FACTUAL history to understand the very real dangers the USSR and Red China presented during that period in time. Detente bought a temporary reprieve. And now we [ USA and Western Allies ] face a growing threat from islamic dictators and a totally out of anyone`s control horde of islamic extremists determined to take over the World. I think even the IRANIANS are getting more than a little concerned because the front, so to speak, is at their borders. To say we live in a dangerous World is an understatement. ...Oscar

 

And that's all amidst the loving global village. Not knowing one another was a plus for peace action such as for Nixon's Peace Conferences in Paris. Ho Chii Minh was all down right against those Viet Cong; those down trodden fighters of injustice and the right TO BE GREEDY.:2thumbsup:

 

There is no " loving global village " in case you did not notice. I can not even make sense of the rest of your response. A bunch of the usual tripe presented as facts based on NO historical evidence. Those down trodden fighters you refer to had a long history of murdering South Vietnamese village leaders and anyone they chose to for any reason. You do not know shit from shinola. ...Oscar

 

I'm just as conservative as you are at this point ha, ha, ha. What you are trying to talk about; is the justification for using violence against violence. That has nothing to do with the religious symbol of Fish. Fish is about the truth of time overwhelming the values of the momentary views of experiencing change.:biker:

 

The USA is and has been in great danger for quite a long time now. Remember those 9-11 attacks ? There is NO fish that can save you. Some Navy SEALS will help if given a chance to. Same goes for US Marines and Army and Air Force, Coast Guard and others if given the chance to. ...Oscar

 

I will type back like a parrot. That is the only way how. Religion is no partner to war. But who really understands this truly with legal consequences this as a declared war on the middle east, Syria, Iraq, or Iran? Technically it is a struggle with some goal in mind. It has no hope; life in a matter of weeks will be all of us on a big add.

No, I lied. I'm left wing. That's the only goal in Life left for me.

 

Not a single poster on here understands the Middle East, Iraq, or the global political picture. The definition of Hippy does not include being conservative, gun toting, jingoist military supporter.

 

Hey, brilliant:biggrin: Tell me: what is Amnesty international's position on who is right or wrong in the concepts of making peace: Obama's U.S. or Ahamedinejad's (the new guy I don't even hear his name on the News) Iran? If no one's for peace then everyone's for war.

 

I never told you that I supported any of them. That's an irrational leap on your part. I wrote what I wrote earlier, because I remember when US troops were burning the grass huts of poor Vietnamese villagers. Bishop Desmond TuTu asked, "Why is it the white man's burden to go around and save everyone in other countries?" So today I would ask, "Why is it your burden to go and solve Iranian problems?"

I don't blame the Iranians, the Iraqis, or the other Muslims who are wondering why Americans who obviously hate them now want to help them. The world would be much better off without US troops going around killing villagers and burning forests in the name of saving inferior people. Who is morally deficient, Ahmedinejad or Steven Harper?

 

As long as Israel bombs the Gaza, and it is again, it has no right to Exist. Is that a conspiracy from ISIS now?; no I don't think so.