Do people still believe 911 wasnt a inside job?

Facts don't instill fear, the interpretation of fact does.

 

Come on, Lode, let's be honest here. You know as well as I that even if the core failed, it would not have failed in a uniform manner all the way to the ground. And certainly not three times in one day. Do you know what I'm saying to you?

 

So if facts are going to be misinterpreted, thereby causing fear, then shut your mouth and stop spreading the facts?

 

I never once suggested you should shut your mouth. I suggest there might be a more significant discussion on this issue than debating forensic details. The insidious qualities we deal with are their effects.

 

Might be a more significant discussion on this issue? Well don't be so closed-mouthed about it. As they say: bring it, don't sing it.

 

Okay, so as I said the conspiracy is to inspire fear. Not so much mind you, that you take up arms yourself but that you don't object to someone doing it in your stead. The government portrays itself the keeper of the peace while the military industrial complex profits from the ensuing conflagrations.

Don't enlist toward their agenda. Don't go off to war. Cultivate peace in your own home.

There is a body for everything and every thing must eat. Fear eats suspicion.

 

Sure, fear eats suspicion. I can't think of a better way to remove suspicion than by removing doubt, can you?

Don't enlist toward their agenda? Don't go off to war? Ok, and what if I'm drafted? If not me then someone else will be drafted who will fulfill the role of cannon fodder for the military industrial complex. The act of not doing something only changes something if there is not someone to take the place you refuse to take.

 

I do understand, however, that cultivating peace in your own home is the beginning of all solutions to all problems.

 

When you cultivate peace in your home, your children will grow up knowing the difference between war and peace, and will not be fooled into believing that war is peace, or that war is a means to peace.

 

What if you are drafted? Conscientiously object. Fight or flight then seem appropriate but in the face of superior force, flight is the better option.
And so, you cannot cultivate peace at home if you are fighting abroad. My individual choice is not to feed the body of conflict. If the investment of my biology is not sufficient when and where it is, then it is superfluous to me, but regardless, one less as grist for the mill.

 

of course its an error! LOL

Just ask any convict!

you can sleep well just tell yourself its a "COINCIDENCE" and you will feel better!

Oh yeh lets not forget bp's pipeline through Uzbekistan! go tony!

and how about that 7/7 fraud? same shit different day! "COINCIDENCE" LOL

So you chose to go with dubyas conspiracy theory.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_CSPbzitPL8

since all the plane crash videos are easily seen to have been faked you cant even prove a plan crashed and knowing full well they literally told you all lies you still continue to choose dubyas conspiracy theory! WTG!

so why the umbilical cord to dubyas theory anyway?

 

in america the only religion you are free to practice is the governments secular humanism religion, and that is not a defense.

 

Yep, as boring as that is.

The alternative is that the BBC was involved in the conspiracy - good luck proving that one.

Was it BP's pipeline?

Like I said, emergency planning scenarios were being played out pretty much every single week pre and post 7/7.
Ask the person who was involved that day.
He seems rather embarrassed about trying to capitalise on people's deaths.

Storch relies on first responder testimony. Do you want me to go find some first responder and eye-witness accounts of them seeing aeroplanes hitting the tower? Was it you who dismissed some footage because it wasn't shown on day 1? I can't remember.

For one, it isn't his theory. For two, it certainly beats holographic aeroplanes and thermate explosives.

 

I've been meaning to ask, what do YOU mean by 'in their own footprint'?

 

To be honest, I've never been on an aeroplane. I have no plans to do so.
I thought they were groping passengers a lot longer than 11 years ago.

I don't think you are lying. I remember reading such articles myself. I knew he was ill - and it's not a stretch of the imagination to think he'd have been dead already. It's not a stretch to think Al-Qaeda used his iconic status after he had supposedly died. It could also be that his death could have drawn a line under an ill man. He died an honorable death and 'the west' can't hurt him anymore. He wins - as it were. It could have been a bizarre PR stunt by Al-Qaeda.

Usama bin Laden has died a peaceful death due to an untreated lung complication

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,41576,00.html#ixzz2AgDN3PJW

I imagine you would be a little suspicious about one person claiming Saddam had WMD.

Do you think his death originated from one source?

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFTLKWw542g"]Billy Joel - We Didn't Start The Fire - YouTube
Do you think Obama or GWB were/are singing this tune?

 

Odon,

After all this discussion, you don't know what the term "in its own footprint" means? I don't believe that.

Also, reporting the collapse of WTC#7 before it occurred was indeed an error. Not in the way you think, though.

If some jets crashed into buildings in Russia in the same way, and shit like the premature reporting of the collapse of a building occurred, you'd know exactly what to make of that. But it was your home-team, and you have home-team fever. Because of that, you no longer have the will to know exactly what to make of it.

 

ok suffice to say you do not believe in holographics despite its existence



or thermate despite how obvious it is



however you do believe that a building can collapse into its own footprint despite that its impossible as a result of a damaged section



but you do believe in cgi.

 

The emphasis was on what YOU thought it meant. Not what it meant to ME.

Do you seriously believe OB reporters know exactly what they are talking about, and are not farmed out to parts of the world because it supposedly makes better TV as determined by focus-groups?
How many times have you heard an OB reporter parrot exactly the same information as the in studio reporter has just said, or the in studio reporter prompt the OB reporter?
Only today I heard an in studio based reporter claim 50 million people would be affected by Hurricane Sandy, only for the OB reporter to claim 60 million people would be affected - then the in studio reporter to say: as our reporter has said: 50 million people will be affected.
It isn't beyond the realms of possibility for the OB reporter to have no idea what they are talking about, and merely be a supposedly more effective representation of events, than simply parroting a news wire report.

What else should I think?

It's not about if it is possible but if it is lkely. Especially based on people on the ground saying planes hit the towers and quite conclusive video footage - I don't believe all (if any) were CGI'd.

It does not have to be about thermate. It has to do with your own version of events that you refuse to discuss.

 

Another building 'damaged' at the base rather than upto 2/3rds of the way up. zzzzzz