Russia hasn't threatened anyone for years, why are they seen as a immediate threat today. Seems too much like our witch hunt against Sadaam all over again. With much less evidence.
You don't have an explanation? I am really interested in why you see conflict with Russia is in the best interest of the US citizens, and I'd really like to understand why Georgia bombed South Ossetia, were they a threat to Gorgia's national independence? Did they threaten anyone's free movement?
My question is why are they now seen as the enemy? I'm not sure what your question was. Perhaps the nuke thing, but hey maybe I have a shotgun you have a repeater, the issue of who's weapon is more destructive is moot if you hit the target first.
Of course i do, but i know you, and it isn't what you want to hear, so you will dismiss it quicker than i can type it. Horrible analogy, more like You have a Bolt Action Rifle, i want a bullet proof vest.. When or where have i made that statement ? I haven't, you just made it up "like everything else you claim".
Gawd, then why bother, if you can't remember something asked 2 minutes ago. Hmm, yeah it could be that Nuke thingy. Lets see, i wonder which is more destructive, a missile interceptor or an ICBM with a 550 kiloton warhead ? Hiptastic was right, "which he always is" You have the worst case of Stockholm Syndrome i have ever witnessed.
I think our threats are more destructive. We create a world in chaos, where none existed before. We sought conflict in areas where none existed previously, and we manufactured it. Now we seek justification for our actions. I say there is no jusitification.
Insightful, Funny thing is ,you mention being lied to about wmd's in Iraq in every thread, no matter what the topic is. But in your last 2 threads "current" you are doing the VERY SAME EXACT thing. The very same UN-American tactics you despise of so much.
To me the political mechaninations that lead us into war in Iraq was criminal. I will never forget the con game that was played on the US citizens and through Blair on Britian. If we forget that it happenned we will allow it to happen all over again. I don't want to see that in my lifetime. To go to war with Russia is wrong. If we had not armed the Georgians and trained them just months prior to their attack on South Osettia I wouldn't be suspicious, but we did. We can't deny that. And I wonder about our motivation at a time when our resources are stretched and our debt is ever increasing. Did our congress agree to sending them those arms and training resources? Or was this another executive act? A one last gasp by the Project for a New American Century to achieve their agenda while this administration is still in power. I will not stand silently by and let them do that.
Yes,and in addition,I wish to remind all that MCain and Palin are lying sons of bitches that will do nothing for this country but keep the money flowing away from the middle class and keep it pumping to the rich through war profiteering and outright tax gifts to the rich.
What about your cry of"they sold us porta potties" as wmd? You're doing the same thing. You actually made me laugh with that one. Who said it was "right" or a "good thing to do " ? FYI, Russia armed Georgia, but i guess you forgot about the Abkhazia War. What about the decade before,"when they were trained by NATO". And still are. Armed ? you have no idea who Armed Georgia so you just assumed it was the US. Lets see, Tanks- Soviet-made T-55/T-72 provided by Ukraine. Helicopters- Mi-8/Mi-24 Moscow, yeah that's right Moscow. Armored Vehicles-Ukraine Cannons and Artillery systems-Czech manufactured. The proof is in the results, had the US trained and armed Georgian Troops to keep Russia out, Russia would have been kept out. More like "We cant prove that ", if you can please do. What arms ? Nobody said you were or had to, just don't use the same tactics"lies" to get your point across.
I've seen some blogging that more or less supports Iranian development of WMD's as a right to a national self defense. OK. Taking that tack, why wouldn't Poland have the right to install a defensive missle shield to defend itself from those very same Iranian nukes? In comparison, the interceptor missles seem a whole lot less threatening than the nuclear program espoused in Iran. Poland isn't threatening fire and brimstone on anybody. If the Soviet Union,,,,,,,,,, er Russia is so upset by Poland's move, then let Russia take a more active and constructive role in limiting the WMD ambitions of Iran. Putin can sit back an chuckle while Iran plays a cats paw against Western Nations.
IMHO military men, concepts of the USA and NATO have completely failed. Probably Russia has strongly lagged behind in development of the armed forces BUT vesterns have got armed force in full dung and absolute deadlock. War in Georgia has distinctly shown it. The system of arms and the doctrine taken as a principle military building have led completely to incapacitated army. I am afraid that to the NATO countries in general is not present what chances in case of war with Russia. NATO armies simply will be run from Brest to Potomac throwing all and all. Arms NATO were created to receive more grandmas from budgets instead of really to be at war and win.
Oh yes Gardener, there is ethnic cleansing in South Ossetia. Only its the South Ossetians doing it, with Russian protection. Lets make sure "we" tell "them" that we don't care and we're just going to sit around blaming America for everything.