Does anyone here NOT do drugs?

I'd be able to go more places. Being 21 I'd be able to go to bars and have more fun playing pool. Being out of my parents house I'd not have to worry about being home at certain times so I could go further. And not being on probation means a lot of things, more drug usage, I could leave the state... And go camping, I can't even go camping on probation cuz I might drink or something. It sucks because I want to go climb some mountains and have week long camping trips in the Northwest.

 

I think you're going to be suprised.

 

I probably will be, but thats fine... Things never go as planned.

 

I'm awaiting my piss test to come back negative. I haven't done anything in awhile other than pop some pills....

But I'll be back on track with stabbing myself in the arm with mass amounts of opiates in no time, so fear not.

 

You never know what life will be like for you when get to be 60. I never dreamed I'd be where I am now. Maybe that's why I still take drugs.

 

The governement is full of ridicule and displays massive contradictions within the law. The popular mind THINKS GOVERNMENT instead of working things out for themselves and maintaining independent thought. tobacco and alcohol, both legal - many many people combine. the health risks are massive. the behaviour responses are significant, as fights often break out and vandalism is highly likely to take place amongst a group of pissheads. alcohol; still in mass production, still regularly consumed by countries all over the world. there is also the physical and psychological damage that can be caused in the long run. compare with cannabis;

now, i am hardly society's biggest fan - neither am i about to spend the rest of my life protesting for cannabis legalisation; but replacing the distribution of alcohol and cigarettes with pure marijuana will start righting wrongs (especially so far as vandalism and fights are concerned) and decreasing many problems in a society. the myth is 'it'll send you crazy!'.. most civilian none-smokers of pot will carry this 2nd hand logic. erm, no more crazier than half a bottle of jack daniel's, a few pints and a load of cigarettes. repetitive use of alcohol will have you literally struggling to cope without, too! there's no physical addiction level with cannabis and as far as harm to the body is concerned; it's practically none existent when compared to the dangers of alcohol.
psychedelics are a whole different kettle of fish; OF COURSE they'll send you crazy (if you listen to the government). OF COURSE you're legally clinically insane if you excell 4 acid trips in a lifetime. what they don't tell you is how psychedelics (especially naturals) have been on this earth much longer than they (the original law bearers) have; so what right do humans have in outlawing them to other humans?
after all, we have absolutely no reason to believe that naturally occuring psychedelics and hallucinogens didnt play a major part or even act as a catalyst to evolution..
it would sum a hell of a lot up; especially regarding the development of communication and the production of ideas..

society limits advancements in cognitive capacity, keeping us in routines and in 'one place' in human existence.. a place of control - as opposed to focusing on issues regarding true human potential and continuing to move forward and progress mentally and physically; making essential connections and continuing to learn new things out via extensive research combined with independent thought.