Does Clinton lead Bush in corruption and scandal?

I like the way wacki rated his own thread excellent..this is one of the worst threads I've seen in a long time

 

Nobody thinks that, asshole. But when you are the one shipping THE MAJORITY of drugs into the country, there's lots of money to be made for you and your cronies.

 

:lol:

 

No there are Drug Smuggler's who have nothing to do with the CIA, but the good ones end up getting recruited to do it for them and make them money for their "Black Budget" which they use to fund secret wars that congress won't approve, How do you think the War in Cambodia was funded when Congress didn't declare war on it? Don't Believe me? Look up "Gary Webb" and "Freeway Ricky Ross"...Hell Ricky Ross was dealing Crack Cocaine for the CIA controlled Contras and DIDN'T EVEN KNOW HE WAS WORKING FOR THEM.

 

You ungrateful son of a bitch. You claimed that Clinton is the most successful president in history and I do nothing but help you prove that, and this is what I get? I created this thread just for you. It is just that I am not sure people believed you when you said that Clinton is the most accomplished president in history, I am just listing some of his accomplishments. They are quite honorable.

By the way, do you always post so often in the worst threads you've seen in a long time? You account for more than 25% of the posts in this thread.

 

During the attempted Clinton Impeachment Only 28-30 % of Americans wanted Clinton to be impeached.

Right now only 28-30 % of Americans approve of Bush.

This goes to prove that Abe Lincoln was right ,you can fool some of the people all of the time.

Now that the Democrats have control of the House and Senate more of Bush's scandals will be brought to light.

 

wackyiraqi

MY what an outburst..I think you might be upset with me...like I really give a fuk

I never asked you for shit asshole. You dam well know you're a Bush supporter and this thread is just you being a smartass. In my book anyone who supports Bush should be arrested for treason or felony stupid

Sure..why not? I love badgering war criminals.
So anyway..fuk you and the ship you rode in on asshole. Oh by the way I voted this a terrible thread and lowered the rating.

 

I'm not sure, but I think it is supposed to be the ship I sailed in on. Reminds me of Back to the Future when Bif said "Make like a tree and get out of here".

No please, don't lower the thread rating:bigcry:

 

Okay, I can't take it anymore. Do you want to know why these scandals will be important in the next 1-2 years? Hillary. The republicans are hoping that the DNC put all their eggs in the Hillary basket so when the time comes, they can pull their trump card and expose Hillary as the white trash criminal that she is. Muah...Muah ha ha.....Muah ha ha ha ha.:reddevil:

- The disappearance of the Rose law firm billing records, their later discovery in the White House and Hillary Clinton's inability to explain how they got there.

- Her huge and inexplicable winnings in a cattle futures operation

- Her role in the Whitewater development which was - although the media refuses to admit it - simply a land resort scam and one that was particularly aimed at seniors.

- Her role in the despicable White House travel office firings apparently aimed at favoring the travel firm that bankrolled Bill Clinton's campaign by delayed billing.

- Her role in the use of FBI files on political opponents and the open question of what information from these files she still possesses.

- A case, still in court, involving the alleged failure to report over a million dollars in campaign contributions. Clinton's Senate campaign has already been fined by the FEC for failing to accurately report $700,000 in contributions.

- Her relationship with such indisputably dubious persons such as Johnny Chung, John Huang, Ng Lap Seng, Mochtar Riady, the McDougalds, Craig Livingstone, Webster Hubbell and Jorge Cabrera.

- This report from CNN in 1999: "Deputy independent counsel Hickman Ewing testified at the Susan McDougal trial Thursday that he had written a 'rough draft indictment' of first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton after he doubted her truthfulness in a deposition. Ewing, who questioned Mrs. Clinton in a deposition at the White House on April 22, 1995, said, 'I had questions about whether what she was saying were accurate. We had no records. She was in conflict with a number of interviews.'" . . . Ewing also testified that in a later deposition with both the president and first lady on July 22, 1995, he had questions about the truthfulness of both Clintons. McDougal's attorney Mark Geragos asked Ewing: 'Did you say the Clintons were liars?' 'I don't know if I used the 'L-word' but I expressed internally that I was concerned,' Ewing said."

 

LMAO!! Sure they will. That's why the Democrats have been practically grovelling to Bush ever since they took control of the House and Senate. Don't be so naive, these people are all the same. The idea of political parties is merely for the public's consumption, to make them believe they live in a "democracy" and actually have a choice. Both parties are controlled by the exact same big money interests. Bush's dirty deeds won't be brought to light unless it's by those at the top, who control BOTH parties to meet their ends.

 

[size=-1]According to the 2000 exits polls:
[/size]

• [size=-1]60% of voters disapproved of Clinton as a person
  [/size]
• [size=-1]59% -including some who approved of him - disliked him
  [/size]
• [size=-1]68% said he would go down in the history books for his scandals rather than for his leadership
  [/size]
• [size=-1]44% thought the Clinton scandals were important or somewhat important. (In contrast, only 28% thought Bush's drunk driving arrest was important or somewhat important)
  [/size]
• [size=-1]18% said a reason for their vote was to oppose Clinton
  [/size]
• [size=-1]15% of those who had voted for Clinton in 1996 voted for bush in 2000.[/size]

 

What source are you getting those stats from genious? I think you're a liar..if fact I know you are.

 

Eh...I hate to say it, but most people did vote for Geroge W. Bush because they hated Clinton...in fact most of the population of America hated Clinton, it's just hard for somebody to accept that, with all due respect, that hangs out with leftist/more liberal people who love Clinton. There are groups of people who do like him a lot and always will, lots of people, but I would say from my life experience and travelling around the country, most of them hate him, but it's only after 4 years of Bush that they start to think Clinton was good. My opinion? they are both traitorous scum.

 

Yes, lots of people hate Hillary. Lots of people really, REALLY want to hear EVEN MORE bullshit whitewater stories ten years after the last batch of eighty million stories which went nowhere. There is a right wing press which recycles the same shit, over and over again, for the same audience The problem is that it doesn't matter - those people are never going to vote democrat. These are the people who think Bush's military record is better than Kerry's. They aren't the swing voters, they aren't the middle, and the fact that Hillary pisses them off so much they have hysterical meltdowns is a good thing. Do you honestly think some inconclusive investigation into a travel agency ten years ago is going to keep Hillary out of office when the Republicans invaded Iraq and created a disaster?

And to the two dumbasses, if you think the CIA controls drugs you are using too much product. Get a grip and get your own story straight - the illuminati control the central banks of the world by they need to sell weed to pay for their "black budget"? They stole trillions from the defense budget but they need to play Tony Montana to pay the rent? Seriously dude, global bankers that can engineer the invasion of Iraq don't need to smuggle blow to make a buck. Try to keep your damned crackpot theories halfway coherent for a change.

 

You just go on Personal attacks on me, when Gary Webb said the same exact thing as I did and won the Pulitzer Prize and is one of the most renowned journalists because of his story. It's been proven, no matter how weird it is, so stop trying to call me an Idiot and use stupid ad hominem and personal attacks on me because your uncomforatable with the facts. Just read the San Jose Mercury News's Piece on the Contras, The CIA, and the Crack Cocaine Explosion written By Gary Webb, and then call me an Idiot. Jesus man, you never ceize to amaze me.

 

Dude, if you never used personal attacks I'd find it a bit easier to sympathise. But you do. But if it really hurts your feelings so much I won't do it.

I think Webb did good work. I salute him. Years ago I read "The Politics of Heroin: CIA Complicity in the Global Drug Trade" by McCoy. 672 pages on the CIA's connections with the drug trade. This stuff is not news to me.

The problem is starting with a good article and then drawing ridiculous conclusion that the article doesn't support. Rat said that there was a "CIA-run drug cartel that ships the majority of cocaine into this country", but Webb never said that. He said that some Contras were drug runners and the CIA looked the other way. The CIA deals with all kinds of shady characters, all intelligence agencies do. But that doesn't mean they control them, or that the CIA controls the world drug trade.

Telling me that Webb won a Purlizer doesn't prove your story when you start by misquoting him.

If the CIA touches you, you are not 'it'. People who deal with the CIA are not necessarily controlled by the CIA. They may be CIA contacts, contractors, whatever. But for you, if you can prove that if anyone ever had contact with the CIA, then they are CIA controlled. The world's a bit more complicated than that.

 

Very true, and all the polling and popularity text/voting type crap in the world isn't going to change it.

 

Pepik, if they just "Turned the other way" then what do you feel about "Air America"...the CIA front Company that shipped most of the Heroin during the Vietnam war. The CIA doesn't just "Turn the other way"...they actively involve themselves in the trade.

 

Clinton was good for the economy. Pretty good for domestic policy. SUCK ASS on the "Drug War".

Bush sucks all the way around except to the rich conservative "christian" assholes who believe he is the second coming of christ.

 

I think that's because that ugly bitch he call a ma looks like she was born before Jesus..that is one ancient, ulgly bitch :lol: