Does Clinton lead Bush in corruption and scandal?

Pat Robertson did some exit polls in 1988 that showed many more people would vote for him to be President than Bush Sr.

Let's find some more polls that show 68% of people liked the idea of impeaching Clinton compared with 67% of the people who disliked Bush for creating the mess in the Mideast. Then Bush will be the winner

.

 

You can't...that's an outright lie ...everybody hates Bush, you know that don't you? Show me one person who isn't a retard or a rich religious freak who likes Bush and I'll eat a bowl of shit in hell. :lol:

 

This has turned into a stupid argument over who's the nicer criminal. Why don't you people show as much passion over REAL issues -- not what scumbag is better or worse. The fact is they're all scumbags and they don't give a shit about you. Period. Don't you people see that the Bushes and Clintons are very close to each other, and there's really no difference between them in terms of their overall agenda? They both represent the same global elite!

 

You're doing it again. I've read these books, nobody said Air America "shipped most of the Heroin during the Vietnam war." Why do you need too wildly exaggerate everything? Take a good source and then make ridiculous claims that aren't backed up by it?

 

As Frank Zappa used to sing to the public about politicians, 'You're not number one. You're not even number two.'

.

 

This sort of argument is just a Republican tactic to deflect blame for their own mistakes. It's pointless. It works for them in that it confuses the issues.

 

For starters..anyone who would pose such a silly question like "Does Clinton lead Bush in corruption and scandal?" is obviously defending and deflecting from the actions of a murdering war criminal.
Anyone with a brain the size of a pea knows Bush is the most brutal dicator in history and nobody will ever rival his record of corruption and murder.
It's like asking.."does Pee Wee Herman lead Jeff Dahmer in crime?"
Two completely different criminals..ones a pervert the other's a killer..no comparison.

 

Yes Higher and Gardener...we all know WHY whackyiraqi is here.

 

Pol Pot
Stalin
Hitler
Vlad the Impaler
Peter the Great
Henry VII

I guess I don't have a pea sized brain, since I don't give Bush the "worst in history" prize.

If you want to restrict it to US Presidents, how do the dead at Hirosima and Nagisaki plus the Japanese internment camps compare to Iraq plus Gitmo & Abu Greb?

Bush is a tyrant who is trying to destroy the constitution and create an explicit US colony in the middle east. He doing both of these things poorly. That is enough for me. I don't need him to be the worst in history.

 

Maybe you dont..I do. Ask the
hundreds of thousands dead innocent Iraqis who died over the money grabbers lies....CORRECTION!!!! he's the worst American dictator in U.S history

 

Too bad you can't ask the dead Cherokee or the dead of Nagasaki and Hiroshima.

He's no choirboy, but he's not the worst.

(My belief that accuracy is more important compeling rhetoric is becoming rare as time flows on.)

 

MikeE

Those people didn't die over a pack of lies. They died over aggression or revenge, like most wars in the past. This war is about feeding a madmans ego and wallet, it has no purpose...nobody will ever rival the arrogance or ignorance.

That's your "opinion"..not a fact. I have my own, I say he's the worst sonofabitch that ever lived.

One mans rhetoric is another mans fact and vise versey...it's all subjective.