I'm pretty sure scattered's dreads are over 2 years old now. I've had my backcombed dreads for over 4 years....can I be totally right about this too?
Once again as I stated there are exceptions to every case but for the most part backcombed and natural have completely different looks
the first pic is about 1 year 10 months. second is young, 8 months. third is also young, not sure of exact age. fourth is one year. heres another, fully mature: http://i158.photobucket.com/albums/t116/goatboy1186/100_0281.jpg and another, not sure of age but pretty mature: http://i267.photobucket.com/albums/ii299/freeinalaska/DSC03701.jpg coupla years: http://i416.photobucket.com/albums/pp243/wanderin_blues/DSC03104_.jpg plz to identify.
You keep saying this, but you do not offer any proof to back ya up and you keep refusing to answer scattered about the pics she posted. I can not see a difference between the two methods, you say you can....so show me the difference if it's that easy.
and why defend natural when you just ripped and twisted your girls hair...why not talk her into going natural?
lolno. youve been called out. plz identify the pics. for the record, i think your dreads are comparable to many backcombed ones ive seen.
lol it's cause I dont care about winning an e-battle I just said my opinion, people differed against it, and I defended my beliefs. I don't care if I get proved wrong.
Pat... hey fellow Londoner.... Just wanted to say hey.... And that I never seen you say one method was better than the other, just that some are easily distinguishable from the other...