I think if their logic and what they've learnt dosen't lean towards christianity, they should just be honest about it, they dont really believe, and thats just how it is. but if they think gensis makes more sense than evolution than more power to em, they shoulnd't have to be ashamed of that, or on the other hand ashamed of their possible disbelief. either way, no one should be ashamed, as long as someone is honest in what they believe, whatever that may be.
Perhaps, bacteria didn't develop a resistance but resistant bacteria were always there but in smaller numbers than the non resistant type. Then when antibiotics were applied, those that were not resistant died and left those that were resistant to thrive because they no longer had to compete with those that were not resistant. Thus it would seem like they had developed a resistance when in fact they were always resistant, just in fewer numbers that weren't noticed until the way was cleared for them to thrive. Just my take on it.
In asexual reproduction, you have to flirt with yourself and buy your own dinner-this can lead to depression and physiological dysfunction...
yes i believe pretty much everything else that has facts to back it up, this is no exception. At this point its probably important to point out that i live in America too. People in other countries, don't completely give up on us yet. There are still a few of us that are rational.
While that it is an interesting take on it, that is incorrect. We're talking about strains that were wiped out by anti-biotics and over-time they became better at resisting attacks by medicine. Eventually becoming immune to them. Shut up whitey hippie. it's time for your harmonica lessons inorder to batter PRAYZ JESUS!1
Interesting, how are strains "wiped out" and yet exist in any form? Also interesting is how you know what I said is incorrect, last time I heard, the exact method of how bacteria have gained antibiotic resistance is still unknown, although theories abound none have been proven, after all bacteria are small and it's been difficult catching them in the act but perhaps you know of a study I can look at.
I'm just trying to make a point that humans change over time. How can all those skulls be completely unrelated to eachother?
A couple of those skulls are so similar to humans that they are considered homo sapien subspecies. They had a brain the size of ours, tools and buried their dead. It's a good example of how the separation be between species can become virtually nonexistent.
LOL......Except that they are separate, unconnected and not available as an argument for your bizarro world where God doesn't exist, and you won't burn in hell.. Everybody wants to wiggle off the hook. -
They all look human for the most part. The skulls I posted show a gradual move away from human characteristics along with ages ranging from thousands to millions of years old. (I know you'll contest this.). How old are those skulls?