Yes, good reply. Sorry it's so difficult to have a reasonable discussion with me. Or maybe that's just what you say when you have nothing else?
Or maybe its obvious when idiots are deliberately trying to derail a thread.. or rather 'bog it down'? Just for that, here is an article on Trilobites and why they laugh at Evolutionism: http://trueorigin.org/trilobites_eyes.asp
Not at all. Just your argument. And it appears to have worked. Ah yes, the eyes again. They are indeed complex. Not exactly perfect, though. I'm not really sure why they're an argument against evolution. The trilobite was one result of the cambrian explosion, which was a timespan in which there was a lot of speciation, and a huge number of new and weird animals came to be. Most were of the same primative type as trilobites, sea urchins, mussels, and the like. Sea creatures, as weird as you can make 'em. With the rush of evolution resulting from an environment easy to survive in, creatures with "negative" traits were able to survive and continue reproduction and the evolutionary process. It's no surprise to me that such complex (and yet primative) organisms arose.
WOW 344 posts.. Guess this occam guy without religion. But who believes in god. Has done what he set out to do. Getting 5 people to think is a great victory. all the others that plagarize and quote, well, they were lost the day they decided to stop thinking. Occam