Have you ever fucked a virgin?

Eh, actively choose? No, not at all. It's just... the type of person that I'm attracted to. Usually they aren't receiving much sexual activity. Hahaha. Until I come along and corrupt them.

 

Ahh im not judging you im just tired, ill try and say this better.

I mean i find it surprising that someone who is able to attract partners is attracted to people that aren't. Im not sure if thats any better but there ya go.

 

Yeah. That's exactly it.

But, it's not that I'm attracted to people that can't attract someone, I'm just attracted to someone who just typically doesn't fuck a lot of people. I like a man with priorities, self-respect, dignity, and devotion to getting into my pants - not someone else's. That's all I want.

 

I think I'd like to go with someone who is experienced with their devirginizing, if only because I'd be more comfortable with someone who I could ask questions of.

 

And only a virgin is likely to have these qualities?

 

Fucking isn't about asking questions Dave, its just about fucking and sometimes its about love. There are no questions that need to be asked... unless you're getting kinky.

 

I'm viewing it as a process. not a one time thing. but several sessions, with adjustments, designed for the furthering of both lovers enjoyment.

edit: and what is wrong with kinky?

 

Nah don't treat it like an experiment, sex is about letting go, it's more of a natural instinct then a well thought out plan.

Any non-virgins feel free to disagree with me.

 

Like I said, I'm attracted to a certain type of man and usually guys who don't have a lot of regular sexual activity possess these qualities in my view.

The last thing I want is to be another number, so I'm generally not attracted to the type of guys who are forceful, pushy, demanding sex, requiring sexual acts, begging for sexual acts, or have no appeal to actually please *me* in the bedroom.

Usually virgins aren't out to nail me as some type of conquest. I'm just saying, that generally my percentage leans higher towards virgins for various reasons and qualities that they possess, mostly because of my own personal preference upon the type of man that I'm looking for as a mate and partner, the kind of person I'm attracted to.

 

There's nothing wrong with kinky, i was just saying it is one of those things that actually do require more talking then just animal instinct.

 

I completely disagree. Sex is a process. I mean, I don't really want a partner that just lets go so to speak. You uhh, gotta use protection and have a plan around preventing babies, STDs, and having safe and reciprocal enjoyment in your sex.

I mean, you shouldn't be uptight and stressed out about it, but you've got to be responsible with your body and your other person's body.

 

My last girlfriend went out with me because she thought i "wouldnt treat her like another notch in the belt". So i understand it is an important issue for some ladies. But i myself when i am in one of these relationships need sex not as a way of "conquering" but as a way of knowing i am secure with the person i am with. My point is i sometimes wonder if this type of thing has been misinterpreted in some relationships?

 

In my experience, there is always something new to learn, more to explore, to share, to nurture, to fantasize about when it comes to sex - it's a lot like love in that sense. It's no wonder people associate them so closely.

 

Well babies and STD's are a practicle issue that need to be adressed. What i am saying is that sex shouldn't be "was that good? should i rotate my finger about 7 degrees? no wait the chart sais 5.8" it should be one partner listning - i know it sounds corny- to each others bodies and just roll with it.

Im not sure if i am explaining myself well tonight.

 

Yep. We were 17. He was so nervous he kept losing his erection. it was funny. I gave that poor boy the ride of his life. I had been having sex for a while and he didnt believe me.

 

it should not be clinical during the act, it should be in the mood. it should be of the act.

 

Thanks Dave, That is what i am trying to say.

 

I will fuck anything that moves, being an avid James Bond fan.

 

Which type of thing?

I think regular sex in a relationship does help to solidify the intimacy between two people. It's good to be clear on how much is too much and how little is too little.

Generally, I like it at least every day. But if that's not possible because you aren't living with the person, then I like to know that my partner can handle the circumstance. I don't *need* sex at every corner, I have masturbation for those primal needs - and I can find better ways to know that I am secure with the person I am with, especially if my partner feels the same way about sex that I do - that it's great to have it regularly with me, but he's cool with circumstances when that's just not possible.

And yeah, maybe a lot of the time the notion that men require a certain amount of sex in a relationship to be happy is misrepresented in some cases, only because they seem to think that it's more of a priority.

And that's the thing, I like my man who has priorities. His priority is to please me whenever I'm around and enjoy being pleasured, and not to worry about it when I'm not or when he's not around. I don't think I'm asking too much.

 

despite occasional excessive clinical nature, I am not incapable of speaking with sensuousness, it is simply preferred to seek a more clinical, more precise mode in less intimate surroundings.