Have you ever read a book you didn't like, put it down halfway through, and told other people you weren't a fan of it? I read up until I saw things like virgin being thrown around, and it seemed a little too catty. If you say the rest is worth it, I may check it out. But from what I saw, meh. I may be a little overcritical... I'll consider that.
All you really need is a basic understanding of the universe to join in on the conversation. a basic understanding coupled with an active imagination can take you a long way Hotwater
I'm not saying the thread was worth it at all. It certainly wasn't worth it to me. I'm saying that it was worth it to the people involved in the argument and giving a resounding objective label like "pissing contest" to it isn't fair.
the majority of my close friends are friggin' geniuses. and i honestly don't even think you're that far above average intelligence. anyone who claims to have learned calculus in 20 minutes, never learned calculus in the first place. personally, i passed calculus while sleeping through it at 17. there, now it's a pissing match
The difference between with how you did calculus and how I did calculus is you did it holistically, I did it heuristically. I learn math heuristically, it makes sense, doing systems of equations was always a waste of time, it was just trying to teach you the mathmatic truths and mechanisms behind it, but most math teachers want you to know how to do systems of equations truth is, it's just breaking apart ratios. Calculus is the same thing, that entire year in high school? it's just the same boring retread crap, over and over again, when you're just trying to learn a few SMALL BASIC concepts. it's stupid. just learn how it works, then start applying what you already know to the math. most of calculus is "okay, learn this one thing, and here is how you integrate this small one thing into everything else you've already learned" well, if you already understand what you've already learned, it's NOT hard to put in another module. heuristic thought. it's a useful tool.
I will consider that I may be overcritical. If I am it's probably worse right now. But I won't be apologetic for callin 'ems like I see's em, while admittedly I ducked out early when it started getting catty. Content?
The first 2 parts I agree with you. Not everyone is equal but everyone has the ABILITY to learn SOMEHOW. Ive been around it. hell I have a disability which is part of the reason why I got pissed off on how you went to this subject. I grew up with therapists all my life, hand and speech, my brain development got better, my speech got 90% better and my arm can function day by day. disabled or not, dave. people are "smart" in their own ways. Non-disabled just have to teach them day by day sure your dad couldnt throw a football but you can still sit and talk with him and talk a walk with him because he still knows what you are saying. he just cant speak or have that amount of knowledge that you have
yes, calculus can be simplified into a 20 minute version. it's called heuristics. keep kidding yourself, smart guy. <---just read war and peace in 5 minutes. granted, it was the spark notes, but it's the same thing. as long as i have the basic overall idea.
He's chosen to bathe seven times in the past twenty five years and is more evil than I can readily describe. he is not human. Okay, you go out and get "Fundamentals of aerodynamics" fourth edition, john d anderson Jr And you tell me that my ability to comprehend and assimilate the math in it is from a spark notes calculus. if it helps the india\pakistan version of the book is about half price, shipping takes forever, and the paper is thinner, but it's worth the savings so long as you don't abuse the fuck out of your books.
don't care enough. just know i think you're a full of shit poser. same goes for your bosom buddy bsr. wannabe tough guy and wannabe brain playing make believe on the internet.
Okay you just basically skipped the rest and went to that. means im making a point. i been making a point. you're like talking to a brick wall.
no, it's just your post wasn't all that important to refute. I'll look at it and take it point by point if you'd like, but honestly? most of the time you've been here you've had a pic of yourself in your sig and you're accusing me of being shallow. I don't take you seriously. I don't take deranged seriously. I take YOU even less seriously because you like to play little games thinking yourself to be clever "tee hee hee, I set up this thread to trap you" that's just ludicrous. I'm proud of my attributes. I was the only kid from three ghetto schools in the counties gifted program (not to say that there weren't many more ghetto schools that didn't have any at all, but I was the only kid from the three schools I went to) I faced a fuck ton of discrimination, of criticism, and just plain shit for being different, for not "talking english" well you know what? fuck that, if I want to be smart. it's my right to be. just like you want to be shallow and put your picture on EVERY single post you have, that's your right. just like every other poster on this forum. it is not however your right to judge me. it is your right to stereotype me, but it is not your right to think yourself better than someone who is racist, sexist, or who doesn't like retarded people because they are retarded. I used a dramatic example, hate me for it, don't care. dramatic examples work
:smilielol5: wow after that this thread just went to shit. I dont why people freak out about people that have their picture in their sig, and it seems to be the last resort to insult lol. im not shallow or am i being shallow by doing that, i just do it lol. obviously i dont have one up cause i got tired of that pic but why would you wanna go there? its way off topic. you're the one knockin disabled people and you have to go to make me look conceited too? lmao wow you're a piece of work dear
it's not a "last resort insult" it's I'm trying to be decent when you're being acomplete ludicrous off the wheels nutbag, and you know what? I got sick of it, so I mentioned something that NO one ever mentions but more than a fair measure of people here think about the sig pics of self it's conceited, and you attack me as shallow, it's hypocritical, and you don't even understand the depth of my argument yet are calling me shallow. it's not that I'm a piece of work, I'm just enraged when people are encouraged to flaunt their stupidity, but it is a mortal sin to be proud of some intellectual accomplishment, because it's not credible hell, you even think lunarverse's grasp of physics is decent, you're lost child.
and yet you still argue with me honey. You are a shallow asshole for mentioning disabled people not being able to learn. Simple as that, you are an asshole to me now. Go and insult me and my "self pic sigs" I have confidence! I dont care what you think about me thats all people have to insult me with, are my looks. im not sure why but it just makes me laugh (especially when the argument is going to shit) and yes his thoughts mightve been stupid to you but not to me get over yourself
I don't even know what's going on here. But I'm going to go ahead and say I have put myself in my sig because I like the pic. I think it's a friendly way to end a post. Like hi, here's my face, this is me. Instead of just signing a name. Like looking someone in the eye or something. I think it's rude and cheap to bash people for that. Maybe you don't feel comfortable with yourself in your sig, that doesn't mean you get to tell other people they're conceited for it.