Hillary Clinton

???​

http://youtu.be/IzpxMhh4FNk​

 

I replied to this same issue in the Trump thread.

See this post.

 

Wiki leaks published 19,252 DNC member emails illegally that contained SS, credit card, email addresses, and phone and passport numbers of private citizens.
They also released 77,000 classified military documents that included personal information about Afghan citizens putting them in danger.
They published the names of every female voter in 79 out of 81 Turkish districts putting them in danger.
They published 80 malware sites including those providing ransomware and remote trojans.
They deleted their poll asking people to speculate on Clinton's coughing fit as they recognized it was wrong.
They have been accused of trying to influence the primary race between Sanders and Clinton and Clinton and Trump.
U.S. Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul reported that WikiiLeaks published a classified cable in which the Russian politician Boris Nemtsov recommended that the U.S. support Dimtry Medvedev over Putin. Nemtsov was then assassinated.
The CIA is investigating links between WikLeaks and Russia.
Since 2010 Julian Assange has refused to investigate Russia yet he continually releases data about the U.S.
Russia Today launched a new show called "The World Tomorrow", guess who the host was?
He advised Edward Snowdon to flee to Russia.
He views Russia as a “bulwark against Western imperialism,”.
He is for the Russian annexation of the Crimea.
He is for the dismantling of NATO.
He has published documents about Saudi Arabia and Turkey in an attempt to benefit the Russians.
He leaked documents in an attempt to help Rosatom, Russia's state owned atomic energy company.
He criticizes the U.S. in regard to Syria yet never mentions Assad's human rights issues or the Russian intervention.
He released documents related to the Trans Pacific Partnership and the Trade in Service Agreement in an effort to stop them so as to benefit Russia.

And

When the Panama Papers were released by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, he ignored the billions of dollars stolen by Putin's friend Sergi Roldugin and instead questioned the report. WikiLeaks turned down the report before the Consortium published it and Russian investigative reporters were furious over WikiLeaks actions stating that many Russian journalist were killed over the report and WikiLeaks was questioning their integrity.

​Clearly someone to be admired.

 

Aerianne posted a "fact of the day" suggesting that Wikileaks is a reliable source of unbiased information and Hillary Clinton is "as dirty as a pig in shit".
Disregarding the juvenile analogy, which imparts no information what so ever, and disregarding the fact that the leaked emails have provided no scandalous behavior other than typical political strategizing, and disregarding the fact that Wikileaks never releases anything pertaining to Trump or the Republicans.....

I only pointed out how Wikileaks has attempted to smear Hillary Clinton and the Western powers in general and I pointed out that Wikileaks has lost all credibility, even if all of the information it releases is correct as it certainly picks and chooses what information to release, and times it so as to try and inflict maximum damage to those Julian Assange has a vendetta against.

If you choose to call posting facts about Wikileaks and Julian Assange as attacking him then I guess you would have to consider the release of all the information about the DNC and the anti Hillary, anti Western powers data as an attack by Wikileaks and Julian Assange.

Hillary Clinton needs no defense as she hasn't committed any crimes. Remember the FBI, House of Representatives, speculative Anthony Weiner connection, Benghazi, Whitewater, Travelgate, and the 15 other "investigations".......ALL Of WHICH FOUND NOTHING...NO THING, NADA?

No I suppose not. Some people only remember accusations...not facts and legal rulings.