Hillary Clinton

...why don't you pick something juicy like pay to play, or bill clinton is a rapist and hillary attacked his victims to keep them quiet? Oh, that's right, those things have been proven!

I don't know if this is true or not, but f it is, it's amazing:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zic64WhR14k

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ov5kvWSz5LM
not attached to infowars
Steve Pieczenik, MD, PhD is an American psychiatrist, former United States Department of State official, author, and publisher.

 

So what do we think of this guy, Mr. Pieczenik? Is he on the level? I don't know how to determine that.

We know the clinton's are dirty, they'll stop at nothing to get what they want. We know the FBI is in complete turmoil over Comey's handling of the case. We know the Trump rallys have had paid infiltrators causing violence...and hillary and the DNC were in on it. We know that george soros own companies that own electronic voting machines and that these voting machines have been programed to select hillary regardless of which candidate is selected. It just isn't much of a stretch that the clintons are trying to steal the white house. Their funding has been uncovered. That should be enough right there to give you a sick feeling.

Where do you think Wikileaks has been getting their information? Who has that information in the first place? (hint: edward Snowden's revalations.) Who would be leaking that information? ...maybe people in the intelligence community who still believe in this country? People who believe in us, the American people? Another name for them is patriots.

Do you really want open borders? Do you really want common core education? Are you happy with a no growth economy? Did you enjoy the Boston Marathon bombing and are you looking forward to more by our peaceful muslim brothers and sisters? Do you think NAFTA has worked out well and that we should embrace TPP?

You're right, I'm a complete moron. Research this stuff and draw your own conclusions. Discuss it with others.

R, Very

 

Trump has no political experience, supporting Trump is stupid

 

America first, when I heard Trump bashing the war mongers I was all in.


Give him a chance we can throw him out in four years anyway its not like we are choosing a king.


Four years is a short time and in 3 years we do all this election stuff again , yuck.


If Hillary wins she will be the next one term president.

 

Yep. I saw this from another place just a few minutes ago.

 

His claims:

Pieczenik then explains in the video released onto Youtube (see below), that the U.S. Intelligence community has started a counter-coup against the Clinton machine, working in unison with Julian Assange to save the US Republic.
All the data dumps from Wikileaks were courtesy of counter-coup whistleblowers, working to prevent the Clinton network from taking over the US government
Forget the Russian hackers, Pieczenik is on the record saying that the US intelligence officials willingly offered data to Julian Assange. http://theduran.com/wikileaks-whistleblowers-revealed-as-deep-state-officials-as-former-deputy-assistant-secretary-of-state-warns-of-clinton-coup-detat-video/

 

Where is it written you have to be a politician to be President? Dwight D. Eisenhower had no political experience and turned out to be one of the best Presidents of last century.

 

Well, in all fairness Eisenhower was a five star general, he probably had some pretty useful expererience relative to his role as Commander in Chief

Trump is essentially a trust fund kid who knows how to work bankruptcy laws and figured out how to turn his name into a brand and to use reality tv to promote his celebrity.

Actually he isnt that different from a Kardashian if you think about it that way

 

Hilldawg has decades worth and the entire world still laughs at her, even those she has taken money from. lol experience, that's adorable.

 

Rigged: NBC local news mistakenly posts US election results a week too soon, shows a Clinton "win"

https://www.sott.net/article/332880-Rigged-NBC-local-news-mistakenly-posts-US-election-results-a-week-too-soon-shows-a-Clinton-win

 

After seeing the Rallies of the candidates and comparing the level of enthusiasm, and the number of attendees, Clinton's numbers pale in comparison to Trump's. Pence draws in more attendees tha. Clinton and Kaine combined. Poor Kaine couldn't gather more than 30 people to attend his rally in south Florida. And Hillary has to get the room cut in half with movable walls to make the crowd look bigger for photo shoots. With this information, I have a difficult time believing any poll with Hillary leading with more than 2 points.

 

Hillary still has a healthy lead in the polls

 

The polls are rigged.

 

We saw how useless they were in the primaries. It was refreshing to see so many establishment republicans take a beating.

 

Orison

Interesting question can a negative be proved?

I mean if someone makes a statement that X exists and is asked to produce some proof of its existence - is it an acceptable reply for that people to then say ‘prove it doesn’t exist’

To me the fact that they are needing the questioner to prove something one way or another would seem to indicate the person making the claim doesn’t have the proof either and couldn’t find any.

So the probabilities would seem to indicate the supposed existence of X is unlikely.