Hillary Clinton

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Karen_J, Oct 1, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Vanilla Gorilla

    Vanilla Gorilla Go Ape

    Messages:
    30,289
    Likes Received:
    8,588
  2. Vanilla Gorilla

    Vanilla Gorilla Go Ape

    Messages:
    30,289
    Likes Received:
    8,588
    11 links to the same story ????


    Thats an oversight hearing for government departments, its not like she was being forwarned about a hearing she had to be questioned at herself


    Its interesting how many of those articles seem to duplicate each other almost word for word

    Also interesting how all of them seem to twist it to implying it was a hearing for her emails

    the second link does it blatantly:

    FBIs investigation and this oversight hearing two completely different things


    Pure unadulterated bullshit, obvious media bias or do these journos actually understand what they are talking about?....or are they just copying and pasting from other sites?


    Did Kadzik actually do anything illegal? Anyone involved do anything illegal?, how is it even a conflict of interest?


    This is pretty much the only email people are talking about in the recent two dumps, out thousands


    This is it? Seriously?


    Wikileaks is soooooooo lame
     
  3. storch

    storch banned

    Messages:
    5,293
    Likes Received:
    719
    You're completely overlooking Clinton's gross negligence in her mishandling of classified material. She is also guilty of violating U.S. Code and her legal obligation to follow proper procedure and protocol concerning her use of her own private email server. Your attempt to excuse her by pointing out that hacking is a widespread problem is weak. You don't want to acknowledge that she breached her legal obligation to use a State secured server. And your only answer to what she has done is: It probably wouldn't have made a difference anyway. Weak!

    At any rate, we're not discussing your invalid excuses for Clinton. We're discussing the fact that she is guilty of gross negligence. Do you have anything to refute this:

    Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
    __________________________________________________

    If you cannot show me in the above Code that gross negligence depends on "intent," then Clinton is guilty of gross negligence. Do you even see a synonym for the word "intent" in the above Code? Comey was talking out his ass when he made the comment that "intent" must be proven to substantiate gross negligence.

    And even if you believe Comey's lie concerning the necessity of "intent" to prove gross negligence . . .

    He said:

    "Our investigation looked at whether there is evidence classified information was improperly stored or transmitted on that personal system, in violation of a federal statute making it a felony to mishandle classified information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way, or a second statute making it a misdemeanor to knowingly remove classified information from appropriate systems or storage facilities."

    I trust that I don't have to point out the distinction he made between mishandling classified information intentionally and handling classified information in a grossly negligent way. So, now that you understand that "intent" is not necessary to prove gross negligence, are you still going to claim that she did nothing illegal? Remember, we're talking about classified material being transmitted to and from an insecure email server at the discretion of Secretary of State Clinton. And if you want to try to push the idea that nothing classified was sent or received on that unsecure server, consider this:

    WASHINGTON — Government investigators said Friday that they had discovered classified information on the private email account that Hillary Rodham Clinton used while secretary of state, stating unequivocally that those secrets never should have been stored outside of secure government computer systems.

    Mrs. Clinton has said for months that she kept no classified information on the private server that she set up in her house so she would not have to carry both a personal phone and a work phone. Her campaign said Friday that any government secrets found on the server had been classified after the fact.

    But the inspectors general of the State Department and the nation’s intelligence agencies said the information they found was classified when it was sent and remains so now. Information is considered classified if its disclosure would likely harm national security, and such information can be sent or stored only on computer networks with special safeguards.
    ______________________________________________________________________​_________________________

    Your argument for excusing Clinton's gross negligence boils down to a scenario in which someone is put in charge of another's house, and is told to keep the door locked for security reasons and signs an agreement stating that she has been trained in locking the house down. Then that someone decides that they will drive to town to get groceries, and they fail to lock the doors before driving off. Then when the owners of the house return and find that the door is unlocked and items missing from their house, they take the person responsible for not locking the door to court for gross negligence. And the lawyer for the negligent person attempts to sway the jury by telling them that break-ins occur all the time even when doors are locked. That's the weakest of arguments.
     
  4. Aerianne

    Aerianne Lifetime Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    37,095
    Likes Received:
    17,186
    1 person likes this.
  5. Aerianne

    Aerianne Lifetime Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    37,095
    Likes Received:
    17,186
  6. Vanilla Gorilla

    Vanilla Gorilla Go Ape

    Messages:
    30,289
    Likes Received:
    8,588
  7. Aerianne

    Aerianne Lifetime Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    37,095
    Likes Received:
    17,186
  8. Aerianne

    Aerianne Lifetime Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    37,095
    Likes Received:
    17,186
  9. deleted

    deleted Visitor

    bitch is live at heinzs field in pgh ..comment section on feed full of dislikes. .
     
    1 person likes this.
  10. Aerianne

    Aerianne Lifetime Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    37,095
    Likes Received:
    17,186


    This just gets more bizarre.

    http://wearechange.org/internet-fire-speculation-podesta-emails-contain-code-child-sex/




    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]
     
  11. GeorgeJetStoned

    GeorgeJetStoned Odd Member

    Messages:
    2,426
    Likes Received:
    1,097
    OK, I found yet another reason I'll burn in hell:

    [​IMG]
     
    3 people like this.
  12. Ja90

    Ja90 Member

    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    13
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfL5KwUuvMc
     
    1 person likes this.
  13. 6-eyed shaman

    6-eyed shaman Sock-eye salmon

    Messages:
    10,378
    Likes Received:
    5,158
    Clinton campaign insiders are apparently into spiritual cooking with bodily fluids.
     
    2 people like this.
  14. Ja90

    Ja90 Member

    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    13
  15. Vanilla Gorilla

    Vanilla Gorilla Go Ape

    Messages:
    30,289
    Likes Received:
    8,588
    Oh FFS, Abramovic is a performance artist

    Triple facepalm
     
    1 person likes this.
  16. deleted

    deleted Visitor

    [​IMG]
     
    3 people like this.
  17. Aerianne

    Aerianne Lifetime Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    37,095
    Likes Received:
    17,186
    What's up with Katy Perry and Madonna getting nude to encourage votes for Hillary?

    That's demeaning as fuck for women.
     
    1 person likes this.
  18. deleted

    deleted Visitor

  19. deleted

    deleted Visitor

    [​IMG]

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQ7lYRnF1F8
     
    2 people like this.
  20. Aerianne

    Aerianne Lifetime Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    37,095
    Likes Received:
    17,186
  21. 6-eyed shaman

    6-eyed shaman Sock-eye salmon

    Messages:
    10,378
    Likes Received:
    5,158
    Hillary is so vile, even the demons she summons via spiritual cooking ask them for tips.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice