Hillary Clinton

It's funny. She's involved with not one, but two e-mail scandals!

 

Just a friendly reminder to please work on reading comprehension!

 

really?

 

is it really that awful to accuse someone of having a medical condition? she did this weird thing that looked kind of like a seizure, and people seemed to joke about it a little bit. seems pretty unimportant to me, but if she really did have a seizure would that make her any less of a candidate?

 

20 Embassy attacks during the Bush administration and yet the republicans are making a big deal over Benghazi – unbelievable





hotwater

 

You're right. They don't stand a chance. The electoral college system is designed to make it virtually impossible for a third party to win the presidency in this country. Even Ross Perot wasn't able to make little headway with it. Which means people who vote Third Party are just trying to make a statement at the expense of winning. And in this election, that's really dangerous, because we have a crypto-fascist running on the Republican ticket.

 

Such cuckery

 

see arrow's impossibility theorem ... i definitely didn't ever hear of it in "politics" or such class, i think i heard about it in "math" or something ... hmmm

 

A flawed democracy.

 

I dont really feel like discussing this anynore, but I will say -

The corruption is nothing new to me. That's why I am an independent voter and have been, instead of joining the Democratic party.

But I guess i'm a little confused how, now that the writing is on the wall and there is proof of corruption, how Democrats like yourself think it is okay. Like, you're okay with political appointments in exchange for donations? Have you never paid attention to how much damage this can cause?

I'm confused as to how Democrats can continue to convince themselves they're better than Reoublicans? Ideologically speaking, yeah. But what is the point of ideologies when you're beholden to your donors at the end of the day?

Bernie ran his campaign on this basic premise and you voted for him, and now everyone who voted for him is supposed to look away? Nothing to see here.

I think i'll vote with my conscience like I always have.

 

Now camp Hillary is pointing their fingers at the Russians and Putin for the wikileaks email hack because Trump and Putin have a "bromance" going on.

 

The Kremlin dismisses all hacked email allegations as absurd. https://www.yahoo.com/news/kremlin-dismisses-us-democratic-email-hack-claims-absurd-102703243.html?ref=gs

Either way, whoever hacked these emails is a saint

 

I heard once from a guy who was friends with me and this third guy. Well this third guy who I knew pretty well but not all his stories. He said to our mutual friend (at the time we were friends), that the Soviets and some people in the USA had made a deal to both become Socialist by a certain date. I don't know why or how they planned this but I know our friend pretty well. He's been in CIA buildings and the white house. He was a marine and served as an intelligence warrant officer. He told our buddy that he has tapes of this so called conversation/deal/confab.

I am supposing now that the Russians are upset that Bernie is not getting into office. That the good ole USA has pulled out of the alleged transaction.

I would not doubt if war were to occur.

 

Really. he is asking a question about something Rat has already clearly explained.

 

From the folks who beautified Saint Snowdon

 

Although it actually might be true this time, it really doesn't mean much that the Kremlin dismisses allegations at their adress as simply absurd. It's their preferred way to handle criticism.

Not if it was the Kremlin The action would be good, the people or organisation that did it however...

This is why we shouldn't simplify things It distorts your perception very easily.

 

Carl

Well the ‘he’ been me I’d reply can you explained what he means by masters