Hillary,Obama and McCain = NEW WORLD ORDER!!!

If Obama wasn't a puppet of the shadow government he would have been ron paul'd and sabotaged out of the equation.


This attempt at a documentary is terrible though..

 

To know that obama is in support of the NAU and then to say he isn't in support of the new world order is a complete contradiction..

and to STILL think that the new world order idea is a "conspiracy theory" then you're a naive sheep strait up..

 

Ron Paul wasn't "sabotaged" by anything other than his own policies and his own conduct.

 

Call people what you want, but I wouldn't trust anyone who believes that I can't disagree with them unless I'm naïve and blinded to the truth.

 

Bull Fucking Shit.


He was blackballed by every single media outlet.

Every political pundit on every news outlet character assassinated him repeatedly. They called him kook, crazy, unelectable, isolationist and they said he was taking marching orders from Al- Queda.

And this is the same News that most Americans watch and inform themselves with what the Mainstream Media tells them.



It isn't just a coincidence that Mike Gravel, Dennis Kucinich, and Ron Paul all "dissapeared"


The truth, whether you know it or not, is that the Mainstream Media controls the elections. They make the news. They tell Americans who to vote for and then the Americans vote.


You must be blind if you don't see this happening. It happens everyday


And about Ron Paul's policies.

So, what exactly is wrong with his policies???? Do you even know what his policies were?

He wanted a return to state's rights! He wanted our troops home immediately! He wanted to end the Patriot Act! He wanted to end the war on drugs! He wanted to end the US foreign policy of Preemption, Nation Building, and policing the world!

What exactly is wrong with his policies???? Ron Paul being elected would be the greatest thing to happen to America since Theodore Roosevelt. And its just too bad that your naive ass can't see that.

Do you want a police state? DO you want a Nanny State? DO you want Socialized medicine?

What the hell, man?

ANd about his conduct? Are you fuckin KIDDING?

Did you even watch the Debates????? Out of all the bickering, yelling, and snarling politicians, Ron Paul was always polite and never spoke out of turn, even though it was obvious that he was being ignored!!!

WTF is wrong with Ron Paul's conduct???


I think you need to do some learnin' before you open you open your mouth again, ok?

Clearly, you have no idea what you are talking about.

 

There we go.

I think you are finally "getting it"

 

SelfControl ~ The only way to stop a corrupt system such as this one is to pull people out of it, not encourage them to take part. We need to keep 'waking them up' to the fact that no vote counts until the polls are empty and it becomes evident the votes are not coming from the people, nor are the decisions that guide our lives.


To those who won't shut up about Ron Paul:
Ron Paul is a borderline racist pro-lifer who would decimate not only America's economy, but that of the world. He has good ideas and a genuine, honest way of communicating - but he is still a part of the machine. He will not lose this election because of big bad evil media keeping him down, or because of lack of people giving a damn about him, or anything else - he will lose because the powers that be did not select him to win. The winner is pre-determined, and no amount of votes, support, or hope will change that. Our vote means nothing.
Stop supporting Ron Paul. You're intelligent, you can see that he is just a part of the system mean to suck in those who would otherwise dissent and possibly cause some real change. He's a blind alley, a honeypot, a trap. You're wasting your time and energy.

 

And you were expecting...what, exactly?

He was openly anti-corporate, dealing with a media that is owned 169% by large corporations.

Howie Dean made the EXACT SAME MISTAKE...expecting the internet to carry the day. It didn't work then, and it didn't work now.

And it shows that neither man is as smart as they needed to be, and thought they were.

 

Actually, Selfcontrol is incorrect. If anything hurt Ron Paul, it was his followers, as you just demonstrated.

They come off as a pack of howling fanatics, and that turned people off on the internet, which is the only place he had a chance (he was doomed anyway, but people such as yourself were his worst enemy).

 

Debateable. It depends whether you think that the people decide who to vote for based on media coverage, or (my theory) that the media decide their coverage based on who's likely to vote for him. The media very rarely has much in the way of ideology or principles; it tends to move with the dollar, and if Ron Paul has a minority votership or if his campaign doesn't sell, they won't waste airtime on it, regardless of whether he or anyone else was saying "down with the government" or "the government is awesome" or "I am so all about FOX News right now! EXTREME!".

But regardless, most people I've encountered on-line (even in my country where we don't even need to give a shit about your endless frickin' caucuses) know who Ron Paul is and roughly what he stands for. So unless you're complaining that the media didn't lie for him enough, I don't see how you can blame coverage. Ron Paul did not fail because people wanted to vote for him.

And TGRR's absolutely right:

• I have never encountered a Ron Paul fan who sees the merit in any other candidate.
• I have never encountered a Ron Paul fan with a sense of humour about politics.
• I have never encountered a Ron Paul fan who could control the length of his posts.
• I have never encountered a Ron Paul fan who didn't post YouTube videos in place of some kind of reasoned response.
• I have never met a Ron Paul fan who would defend Paul's policies, rather than attack those of others (tending to attack "your candidate", irrespective of who "you" are or whether "you" even have a candidate).
• I have never met a Ron Paul fan who did not blame lack of media coverage for his lack of votes.
• I have never met a Ron Paul fan who did not cry electoral fraud every five minutes.
• I have never met a Ron Paul who didn't have a vlog.
• I have never met a Ron Paul fan who didn't have Aspergers.
• I have never met a Ron Paul fan who could accept that someone could have a different opinion than them without being "blinded" by the media (see above).
• I have never met a Ron Paul fan who could believe that you'd considered their candidate as an option if you didn't then decide to support him (see the media coverage thing).
• I have never met a Ron Paul fan who could admit defeat.
• As a result, I have never met a Ron Paul fan to whose opinion I would give credence.

And before you cry "sheeple", you should be aware that, in my own country, I am a third party voter.

 

SelfControl has NEVER talked to a Ron Paul supporter.

 

Ron Paul got very strong support in a certain demographic. Unfortunately that demographic is people who think the world is a giant conspiracy and there's no point in voting.

Kind of a dumb demographic to go after don't ya think?

 

You can't talk with a Ron Paul supporter.

They talk AT you.

 

Lawl. It's the Perot effect.

 

I don't know, maybe there is a silent majority, a wealth of sane, balanced people who support Ron Paul. If so, maybe they should make themselves known, instead of letting the obviously-a-tiny-minority of autistic obsessive keyboard warriors and David Icke fellators speak for them.

Any takers? Anyone?

 

Some of them see the point in voting, and they'll get right on it as soon as they get bored of the Internet.


OH WAIT THEY NEVER GET BORED OF THE INTERNET.