HIPPIES, PSEUDO v.s. GENUINE

Drop out of the rat race [/QUOTE]

I don't have to, I all ready did... 41 years ago.

 

PR, I was going to originally ask that if this is all meant to be the future as deemed by the Elite, then why are they letting us know ahead of time? But, in re-reading your post, it seems you are saying that they essentially want us pre-programed as to what is coming down the pike for us. Correct? Man, that takes a lot of damn thought on their parts now, doesn't it?

All I can say is, I guess I'm glad I'm 53 then. If it's taking them this damn long to carry out the "finale" of the master plan, I surely won't be here when it comes to pass.

 

Yes, because when people read these books they believe them to be fiction. That's how they are sold to the public. They don't question the idea that maybe there's more to the story, or that the books are put out with an agenda. So what it does is subconsciously condition people for events that will happen in their lifetime, so when it happens it seems normal or like a natural progression. This is the case with a lot of the science fiction that has been put out by various people over the past 100 years, whether it's H.G. Wells, or Orwell, or Stanley Kubrick.

This is the same thing I hear from my dad all the time, who is only a few years older than you. The thing is, we truly are living at the tail end of this agenda, and I believe we are going to see things happen in just the next three years alone that are going be unlike anything the world has experienced in recent history. We are already looking at a national ID card starting next year. By the year 2010 the unification of the Americas is scheduled, and by 2012 the UN is set to take over as the official world government. In order to bring about these changes, they're going to have to bring the West down to its knees, and I believe this is going to be done using more terrorist events coupled with a collapse of the world economy. And a lot of this isn't even speculation from me, but based on what has been openly admitted by some of these people on the inside, who know the public can't be bothered to read their books and documents where this is all talked about. This is what separates conspiracy theory from conspiracy FACT.

 

Then, I'll say what I always say: "I'm glad I drink." 2012 - 5 years away. Mmmmm, *ponders how fast I can kill my liver and be done with it all*

At least I know for sure, I'm not on the Red OR Blue list. *lol* My gut tells me, I won't see this in my time. But if you're right, then gawd help us all.

Thanks again, for your thoughts.

 

red or blue list hmm?

I remember reading about that once.

 

I am sure that's what a lot of people's guts are telling them because if it was telling them otherwise they might feel pressured to actually do something concrete.

For governments to carry out massive agendas is quite easy, as long as they can create a big enough crisis that will scare the public into submission, where they will willingly relinquish their rights and sovereignty for what they perceive as "security." This is the age old CON of those at the top.

 

Yeah, I'm guessing so. Because I read about it from a link you posted above (Educate Yourself). I forget which section it was in, but the link to the page about it is in my FEMA post, if you want a refresher. And, did you know that you can use Ctrl+F (find) on web pages as well as a word processor? That way you can get to what you're looking for without reading the whole thing if you're not in the mood.

Essentially, the red and blue lists are the same type of catagorizing the Nazi's used when they rounded up people. People on the red list are taken first, then the people on the blue list follow.

 

Well,
I guess I should be honered. I'm quite sure I'm on the red list, but don't fret, I'm also quite sure the two of you will come right after me on the blue list. Hey, we're all going to die anyway.

Maybe I could tattoo a swastica between between my eyes. Charlie did it and although he's not living too well, he is alive and approaching his mid seventies. Then again, Charles was an exceptional man, I'm just an ordianry person.

 

So says Charlie. :lol:

 

Never talked to him, thank God, so I wouldn't know.

 

hannahannahannah,

first off, you might consider changing your name, it's confusing because it's too repetitive, it's confusing because it's too repetitive, it's confusing because it's too repetitive.

But to get back to the original intention of the thread, who do you think represents the genuine hippies? I get the impression that you could care less about hippies or who represents them.

 

The reason I chose that screen name, is it was all I could think of at the time and it was the first one I ever had on the net. It's my name 3 times - and 3 is a cosmic number, no? I rather like it. So, just try not to look at it and you should be ok. Or, you could just us hannah. But I've got a post count going, so this is what you'll be seeing.

If you've run into other of my posts around and about the forum you'd see I care quite a bit about my past and the times I (we) went through. For instance, go check my introduction thread when I first landed here about 2 weeks back. Other than that, I'm not here to explain myself to anyone. I'm here for interests sake, good reading, fun and reliving a bit of the past via posts.

And with that lunch is over....

 

one of those people who closes the case and that's that. I'm too tired to quibble over things that don't matter. Interests sake, good reading and fun? Join the establishment then, the very thing that hippes opposed back in the day. Although, things have changed a little since then, there isn't even an establishment anymore and the middle class, that amorphous socio economic group that stood for absolutely nothing (much like you hannah?) doesn't exist either. By the way, hannah, in case you're not quite old enough to remember it was that same middle class from which hippies became who they were by removing themselves from it and rejecting it.

You may not be here to explain yourself but I am here to ask you for an explanation. I'll read your introduction thread when and if I choose to. I'm not here to answer to you and I don't give a shit whether lunch is over or not. I eat and do what I want when I want and I'll stare at the four walls all day long and still consider myself more responsible then for instance an American soldier who kills other human beings for...nobody seems to be able to tell me what.

peace sister

 

Stop being such an asshhole. What the fuck is your problem? You have no right to talk to her like that. What did she do to earn such a condescending response, from some asshole who thinks he's got life figured out?

I expect an explanation promptly, and I'll read it when & if I feel like it.

 

I can't tell you what to do and I would not presume that I could, you go ahead and read my explanation when and if you choose or don't read it at all, it's all the same to me. However, bro' I did not tell hannah that I "expected" an explanation from her as you have told me, I simply asked her for one. There's a difference. This isn't about protecting the fairer sex is it, because when I perceive that someone has shown a certain degree of disrespect for me (I'm not sure if my perception was correct in this case) I don't care whether it is a man or woman I do what I can to stand up for myself.

 

I don't consider women t be any "fairer sex", nor would I hesitate t get pissed off at a woman who deserved it. But in this case, she didn't deserve it. How'd she disrespect you, man?

 

SP, I've revisited my posts in this thread and fail to see where I disrespected you. As a rule, in RL and on the net, I don't disrespect anyone. Someone has to give me a MASSIVE HUGE reason for my not respecting them...and to not act civil inspite of what I may think of them.

The only thing I can note is possibly my cheeky comment about Charlie Manson. Because it was directly after that, when you went off on me. If you need an explaination for that post, it was done in humor only, and directed at no one but Charlie. I was in Los Angeles when the Tate-LaBianca murders happened. I was 15. We watched the news as it all unfolded, and as the family went to court, the girls sitting outside the court with shaved heads, blah blah. My comment, was a reference to how much Charlie thought/thinks of himself due to the things he said at that time (and still does). And, nothing more. I have not posted back to you, because I could not figure out where your words were coming from and why, and I (having been a member at several forums) viewed your comments to me as baiting and button pushing. I mean, my screen name? I saw no point in replying since you had me "figuered out".

At any rate, when I see another human being step up to the plate on my behalf (twice), I know I need to come here myself and try to make things make sense. This, is the "peace-nik/hippie" in me. And, it's the right thing to do. Whether or not you accept my words, is not important. I hope you can see where I was coming from, but I won't die if you don't.

So, back on topic.

Describe for me the meaning of "right wing hippies". What do they do, or specifically stand for? And if they are so right wing, how are they "hippies"? In my experience, all "hippies" were left. Any of my friends that went "right", gave up the hippie beliefs and lifestyle. Are you saying in your original post that Arians and skins heads are right wing "hippies"? If I'm reading that right, hippie, is the last label I would put on those folks. But maybe there's a new buzzword/term I'm not aware of.

PR, I dont think I consciously recalled this, but while at work today for a nano second, I felt like I was a cog in a huge wheel. I flashed on a scene from the movie Brazil. :\

 

The thing is, Left-wingers are no cooler than Right-wingers. The only people that are really figuring out what's going on are the people who don't take sides in the political game. The Left is just a tool. The real enemies are not in the Right-wing, and the Left-wing is not the good to oppose the Right's evil. Leftism is just another box that people put themselves in. The Right is used for a lot of ends, but so is the Left.

The Right-wing political groups are used to take away things like rights to privacy, while the Left is used to do things like take away people's guns and impede their freedom of speech via "political correctness" and "hate crimes" laws. Both are valued equally to the Illuminati. They are not a Right-wing organization. They created the Right and the Left and use them both to equal advantage. George W. Bush and Al Gore are both working towards the same agenda, while seeming to be at opposite ends of the political spectrum. It's clearly bullshit.

So, therefore, hip folks aren't the ones that lean left, but those that don't lean at all. I'm not saying you can't have any left-wing or right-wing views (as they're percieved), and that you have to be "middle of the road" on every issue, but to be a member of the Left or of the Right is futile. Besides, most of today's issues are just distractions. Abortion, gay marriage, evolution/creatonism, etc. The real issue is freedom, and it's being curtailed every day while morons argue back and forth about whether a fetus counts as a person or not. There's a much more imminent threat: the loss of our fundamental freedoms.

Be true to yourself, and don't give in to new fascistic policies just because it's easier. Refuse to get a National ID Card, and definitely refuse to be microchipped when the time comes (and it will). I can't stress this enough. Once the chips go in, the battle is lost. Not just because we can be tracked via the chips, but because we can also be controlled remotely by them. They can make you docile or aggressive, sexually high or suppressed, and other things. This can be done individually or en masse. If you get chipped, you're fucked. There's no getting these things out. Check out how small this one is:



And that's just what we're being allowed to see. If they go in, they don't come out.

I know I went off on a tangent there, but the microchip information is vitally important. If people say no to one thing, it has to be the microchips.

 

The original hippies were born out of a need to counterbalance something that had gone wrong in society.

You younger people, the neo-hippies, have no real concept of what those days were like if you weren't there. Reading the history books will never put it into perspective.

The entire social structure was realigning itself in a way that history had never seen before.

That has not repeated itself up to this point in time.

Now, I suppose that imitation is the highest form of flattery, but you have to understand what the causes were that we fought for in those days.

To question authority is always high on the list. And with that, we can find common ground.

Being a hippy isn't about physical appearances. It's about making a stand for something you see wrong in the world, despite being neck deep in a current that pushes against you.

It's washed many a good brother and sister downstream.

My advice is don't be imitators. Be innovators. This new century demands it.


x

 

Actually, hannah there were two things that you said that pissed me off and neither of them had anything to do with Charles Manson, I don't think. The first thing was your "And with that lunch is over...." comment. I just find those kind of statements very trite and I expect more from anyone who makes them. Sorry if I blew up at you, it was just a spontaneous outburst and I should have thought it over first before I did it, OK.

The second thing was that you said, "other then that I'm not here to explain myself to anyone."

It sounded to me like you were implying that you didn't have to explain yourself to someone like me and I found that insulting. Even if you were not singling "me" out, I still don't think it is right to make those kind of statements to anyone. Of course no one ever "has" to explain themselves to anyone else but wouldn't you think that if you were really a hippy that you would want to explain yourself and explain yourself again and again until you were exhausted by the effort of it. People need to know who we are as individuals and what we stand for as a group and that does not only apply to hippies, it applies to everyone. Not wanting to or feeling that you don't have to explain yourself is not something that I take very lightly. It's importent for us to explain ourselves. How else does anyone know who we are. So I was mad for that too.

As far as the mockery I tried to make of your screen name, I can't explain why I did that, I don't know. It was uncalled for entirely and I apologize for for it without trying to excuse myself.

peace and love,
peter