How many people here refuse to use condoms?

Herpes isn't 100% nonfatal. Even though for the most part, it reappears in the area it's originally transmitted to; it can travel throughout the body.

For instance, a bad herpes eye looks exactly like what Edgar Allan Poe talked about in the Tell-tale Heart, which suggests he may have known someone with the condition.


But it can also infect the brain and the nervous system (usually HSV-1), which can cause death, seizures that could lead towards death, and neurological damage.

 

I think I`ve come across that info before, thanks for reminding me. It`s interesting though that it`s HSV-1 that is more likely to be fatal, and yet it is the strain of HSV which is most likely to be transmitted by non-sexual skin contact. Though, I assume fatal instances are very rare.

There`s another thing I think is fatal, too. And that is...life.

Edit: I am also mystified by the new evidence that silent HPV causes most head cancer. Have they made the vaccine available to males yet? I do like to eat pussy, you know.

 

I don't use one with my wife but I do with girl on the side.

 

A person who "refuses" to use one is pretty damn stupid.

 

Well there is one well articulated argument.

I'm an adult capable of making my own choices and I only have sex with similarly mentally mature adults. But I refuse to use condoms. So I suppose that means that by your very clearly stated argument, which is undoubtedly based on hundreds of hours of research, I'm stupid. And so is every woman I've ever had sex with.

I'm pleased to have had this conversation with you and I hope to one day see you run for political office. You're ability to define an issue and extrapolate the underlying problem would, undoubtedly, be a gift to the world and the first step to solving all our world problems.

 

If you know your partner is clean then by all means, it's much nicer without one. But if you don't know your partners history then you should always use one, it is just to dangerous. If you don't mind having sexually transmitted infections then go for it! It's worth it for bareback sex right?

 

Do some research instead of fear mongering and get off your high horse.

 

I have done research and my findings are pretty scary, so much so I wouldn't even give head to a new partner unless he got tested first. Herpes round the mouth, no thanks!

 

Feels good to be - instead of + that is for sure

 

Well I tell you what,
You can listen to all the fear mongering you want. Whereas I'm going to exercise my God given biological right to sex and enjoy this beautiful life by living it to the fullest.

 

I'll use them then lose my hard on, but always after they get so turned on that they say just take it off and keep going. I'm proud of that

 

I suggest you all start using condoms....

 

me too


especially if you're young


if you're old then what does it matter anyway lol

 

ya man, and nice Layhey sig !!!

 

like a shithawk!!!!

 

What is your take on aids then? And as Duck and Moe pointed out, what about unwanted babies and overpopulation?

If a person is going to have sex they should be responsible enough to avoid things like aids and unwanted children should they not?

 

I believe in HIV does exist. I do NOT believe that AIDS exists.

By the standard accepted procedures of virology,
Any virus rate of infection into a populace can be plotted out on a graph. If a disease is very old, the graph looks very flat because most people have some sort of resistance towards it. (The rate of infections is stable)

Whereas a new virus spikes really quickly when it's introduced into the population. Most people have never been exposed to it and large amounts of the population will contract the virus very quickly. They have no resistances against it.

And when you look at the HIV rate of infections, it's practically flat lined.

Second,
AIDS is not a virus, it's a "syndrome" The current orthodoxy claims that there is a "correlation" between the HIV virus AIDS. So if someone gets drunk and sleeps outside during winter, subsequently contracting pneumonia and is HIV positive, he will be diagnosed as having AIDS. But if he wasn't HIV positive, he would be diagnosed as being an drunk idiot that got sick.

Third,
The controversy around testing

They never test for a virus, they test for the antibody. And by medical cannon; Once you have the antibody against a virus, your body has successfully fought of the infection.

Also, someone can test positive for HIV in the United States. But because Australia uses a different standard, they will test negative. Add to this that in many African nations, they don't even bother to do the test. A diagnosis is done on symptoms alone. And the "required symptoms" can also change from region to region.

Forth,
The huge sums of money involved in the AIDS industry. It's in the top ten, perhaps even the top 5 of international industries. As once noticed in report from the UN on the AIDS money raised; If AIDS was a nation and not a disease, it would be a member of the G8.

When you consider that even the World Health Organization states that cigarettes and tobacco products kill millions more than "supposedly" AIDS does. Considering the UN isn't involved in a war on tobacco, you get an idea of the real morality at play here.


So as far as I'm concerned,
I'm a retired lawyer and I know a legalese dance when I see it. It's all smoke and mirrors to make money and test drugs out on the 3rd world. Something that has been going on before the alleged discovery of AIDS.

 

I decided to break up the questions because the first took a bit to answer.

Ok,
First thing to know is that a condom is a lousy form of birth control. They break, leak, slide off and people need to be taught how to use them. Under ideal conditions, a condom can only offer you 80% protection. (NB. under ideal conditions)

More often than not, use of a condom seldom under ideal conditions and statistics tend to show at best a 60% effectiveness as a form of birth control.

Real birth control requires education, planing and responsibility. Other than sterilization, the best form of birth control is an IUD in my opinion. It's about as effective as the pill and women don't have to worry about taking a pill each day. There is the Noraplant, a sub dermal implant, but it has been linked to ovarian cysts and cancers.

As for the population problem,

There are 3 reasons the world is over populated.

1) Oil.
It's the hydrocarbon revolution that caused the biggest population explosion. All the transport technologies, petrochemicals, etc power the citieswhere humans congregate in mass numbers and breed like wildfires.

2) Borders.
Humans are migratory animals. We tend to move around from one place to another, depending on where the resources are. (search on the concept of rotating eating the forest)

If you confine us to a given area, we respond like all other mammals. We breed without control. In short, we are over populated because governments enforce borders. According to most research available, if we got rid of passport requirements, border security and allowed people to freely move around. We would see a 23% reduction in world population within 2 generations.

3) Education,
I hate to say it but the ignorant breed more than the educated. Teach a man to read and write and you end up giving him a future. When you give a man a future, he tends to consider his actions and act responsibly. And a responsible man tends to father less children.

 

haven't used one for years plus I'm clean and sterile so there is no need from my side - so where is my fermale masturbation partner?

 

Not trying to badger you or anything, just curious about your thoughts on the potential side effects of not using condoms.

I'll be honest, I never used them when I was younger, but when I see people around me fucking up and having children they never planned for, or getting stds, I don't think I'd ever take that risk again, especially accidentally having a child, goodbye life.