Is Circumcision an Infringement of Male Rights ?

We Sure Did Not Evolved With Out One.

 

If it's wrong to subject girls to such genital mutilation, then it's also wrong to subject boys to the same! To argue otherwise is anti-male sexism!


Why is this acceptable in our culture, for it seems as if anti-male sexism is fine and dandy, but anti-female sexism is just about a federal crime? Sexism should not be tolerated at all, whether it's sexual harassment on the job, stand up comics cracking ugly jokes about men or women, or circumcision on girls and boys. We all, men and women alike, should denounce sexism against men as loudly as we denounce sexism against women. Only then, can true equality between the sexes be achieved, and it will eliminate the hypocisy surrounding the issue. I know this is somewhat a digression from the main topic, but it does tie in with it also.

John

 

i allready got the dinamite i need fuses.

 

well said green .

 

No i dont think it is. i like being circumsized.

 

It isn't and shouldn't be madatory in the US it simple thing done for apperance, or religon and their are some statment towards some cleanlyness issues but it should be a choice of the parents to decide for their children becuse children are not allowed to make choices for themselves at that age. And it silly to think it infringement of rights besuse at that age their are no rights in that area of choices.

It quite clear why people may do it early becuse even though it can be done in adulthood it much more painful and difficut and costly process compared to when done to a young baby.

 

It should be a parents choice if they want it or not. People's rights to circumzie should not be thrown away becuse of the idea that it should be their just becuse you were born with it. And the fact is no proven evidence that it is has bad or good effects on the person. It's not an organ it is tussie just like earlob or nails or of course your skin. That way the effect are minial at most becuse it just extra skin .

If people wanted to speculate why it is there it is probably becuse when people did't wear shorts it would of been very irritating if you did't have extra protection. That is probably why most animals also have forskin. Becuse we are animals too, and it just matter of choicethe forskin does not have a sercet pupose

 

i cant argue with your point of view however i do hand out nasty remarks concerning the females pussy since most of it is true but the real reason is i hate when a female who own a much dirtier reproductive organ comes here and blast on the males and do the same the only difrence is im far more straight to the point than they are.

 

shit ....im doin ok ......its not like i long to reatach a foerskin .....i like my atenuated penis .

 

Makno go to sleep is past your bed time and dont forget your medicine.

 

Besides once is butcher you cant reconect all of those nerves ends so re-attaching the foreskin wont do much . buy a new plasma TV with the money.

 

KEEP DREAMING !!

 

Holy shit! Thread Hijack!

 

My parents didn't give me it. They didn't want to have to clean under there. They told me "Its more hygenic".

If I ever have a son, he'll get to choose (When hes 18+).

I don't care what Americans and Africans do or say (and thinking about it pisses me off, so I'm going to put the entire issue aside and go find a happy thread now).

 

If the person is circumcised at birth then I can't imagine the person missing something he's never had, although it is kind of an infringment on choice still. If its done later of in life though I think it should certainly be up to the penis' owner whether it gets chopped or not.

 

anyone who would take a knife to a child and draw blood (without a bloody good medical reason) should be treat like any other child mutilator.....sling the docile fuckers in jail

yah. sure it does........go buy a text book and find out where the nerve endings are that trigger arousal. ejaculation and orgasm in male genitalia......then weep for your missing out without a hood

 

.


I am glad to hear that this issue is uncomfortable to some folks. Circumcision is barbaric. It was introduced in America because they thought that it would make boys masturbate less, god forbid. Actually it's a way of punishing horrible little boys before they have a chance to become men.

There is nothing unclean about a boys foreskin as there is nothing unclean about a girls labia. Think about it. You have to clean behind your ears, but I wouldn't cut them off to make it easier! That's fucking crazy.

The only medical evidence to support male genital mutilation is newer, within the last 10 years. It was created to endorse a decades old practice. A small percentage of men may develop cancer, which isn't life threatening. The percent is less than the occurrence of cervical cancer in women, which is life threatening. So why don't we remove a female babies cervix?

Recent studies have shown that circumcised males actually masturbate more than their uncut brothers. Think about it. You removed the pleasure center. Okay, I beat off to recieve pleasure. What do you expect? And the ones I've seen, being gay they are several many, the ones that were the most mutilated are the dudes with big ones. Which always makes me think that the doctors were either envious or just went too far, and tried to make sure they got it all. Sick. Sick. Sick.

The mother decides wether the kid gets cut. And I don't recommend that we remove the mothers clitoris in retaliation (that's something to think about) But before the mother decides, she should be forced to witness a circumcision of a baby boy. Believe me, after seeing that no sane person would don it on their beloved child.


robt.

 

circumcision is the most common surgery performed in the US...$400 a whack...there is likely no other reason for its prevelance than the $$.

lucky for me, my parents were poor and i was saved from being mutilated.

 

I think people that have babies undergo surgery for practically no reason at all are retards who should be shot. And the babies too for allowing their parents for being so retarded.

Religious reasons, my ass. If I had a baby and would take it to a tattoo artist to have a huge goat's head tattooed on his chest and say my religion dictates it, would it stop the police or child protection from busting my ass? Both are permanent and may not be desirable to the child when he grows up, and then it's too late.

If they want to have it done, let them have it done. But don't decide for them when they can't say no yet.

As for peer pressure - people who do not stand above that are useless and pathetic anyway.

 

I see absolutely no way whatsoever how circumsicion is any different than "female genital mutilation"... Other than the fact it's done to males.. I guess that makes it alright?