Many are the tales of people who became rich and were still miserable. In fact, I don't think humanity experiences exceptional highs and lows. We're all just stuck being human, no matter how much or how little we have. Maybe having a lot will help you delude yourself more, but in the end you're just the very smallest thing. When I think of the richness of our conversations vs. what I imagine the billionaire class discuss, I feel fortunate that I'm not so wealthy. I feel like the camaraderie of the lower classes is more meaningful. So I think there is an upper limit as well. A point where you can have anything in the world, and you're miserable because none of it gives you any greater degree of joy than you can experience without. Moments of true joy are fleeting for us all, no less so for the rich than for the poor.
How in the heck do you get that from YOUR words??? what a weak and lame attempt to be clever in answer to your question, NO, just as making less money does not equate to a more meaningful life. by your lame logic, those folks should be as happy as pigs in shit because they have no money. LOL, you really could benefit from further education.
University worked out really well for me, and all my buddies from university are doing pretty well for themselves as well.
I didn't. I started in the logging industry as a faller and when I decided to go back to university I worked for the fire service during the summers and commercial falling during Christmas breaks. After I finished university, I moved abroad for work. That was about six years ago - time flies
Yeah I see your point but the thing is it was found that people studying to become school teachers aren't very intellectual. Most people studying to get a teaching diploma or going on to get a master's degree in education typically have unimpressive intelligence scores. I mean no disrespect to people of low intelligence as according to my standardized test scores I have a fairly low intelligence as well. If most school teachers are of average at best intelligence with no particular talents it shouldn't be a surprise that schools are producing mediocre and untalented graduates. So I would put at least some of the blame on the teachers most of whom are paid a nice salary with plenty of benefits.
The only people strongly speaking out against education are those who seem to have little. How have they earned credibility on the subject? I see nothing there but jealousy and hard feelings.
Education is it's own reward. While there's no limit to what a committed autodidact can learn, there's defiantly an advantage to having instruction by subject matter experts. And depending on the field, I would totally hire someone who had years of experience in engineering without a formal degree to be able to design something. However, I would never go to a surgeon who had never been to medical school. As for whether it's worth it financially? Depends on the field. I make significantly more than the income of the average doctorate holder, and I dropped out of high school. Statistically however, you're in much better shape with a degree, and it'll help open a lot of doors. Pressed Rat does make a persuasive argument. There are a lot more important things than money. And money is fundamentally imaginary.
So I find this chart rather suspect. The GRE examines one type of intelligence which is the ability to retain information. IQ tests on the other hand, are generally much more focused on cognitive intellegence; problem solving and ability to learn, meaning the preparation for such a GRE would influence your scores, where preparation for an IQ test would not. In other words the assumption is flawed. It just shows that physicists score better on the GRE.
Well, it seems like being successful in college is based primarily around regurgitating information and indeed relies on GRE scores more than any other area of intelligence. It seems like cognitive intelligence and problem solving doesn't really factor much into being successful in college. College does not really engage a person's higher critical thinking skills.
and how many years did you attend college that causes you come to this conclusion? in other words....HOW THE FUCK WOULD YOU KNOW?
we need porkstock to chime in, he's earned a PHD and has some REAL WORLD EXPERIENCE to back up his opinion on the topic.
The results shown on the chart are for the Graduate Record Examination which measures verbal skills, critical thinking, and writing, and is skewed toward quantitative reasoning. Quantitative reasoning emphasizes algebra, arithmetic, geometry, and data analysis, skills not highly developed or needed in many education majors. So as a result an English major may appear to have a lower intelligence as measured by this test than a Physics major. Different types of intelligence are needed by each major. The GRE is a standardized test used to predict performance in grad school, not under grad work which is what teachers are required to complete. Grad school is not a requirement for primary and secondary public education. When examining intelligence in relation to primary and secondary education it must also be kept in mind that the most intelligent individual does not necessarily make the best teacher. Teaching is a very demanding occupation, about 20 percent of new teachers leave the profession in their first five years, 30 percent in six years. That ranks higher than police who face criminals and life threatening situations. In addition to verbal, writing, math, and critical thinking skills, as measured by the GRE, good teachers must also possess adaptability, compassion, empathy, creativity, personality, organization, enthusiasm, loads of patience, emotional stability, public speaking skills, and professionalism. Teachers do not sit in isolated environments working out complex mathematical equations or conducting research on the latest bioinformatics, which may suit a high intellectual very well. Teaching is a complicated enterprise that most people find very difficult to do effectively. As far as pay the national starting average is $30,377. Computer programmers start at an average $43,635, RNs at $45,570. In addition their wages have fallen behind other college educated people by 13% since 1996. Teachers earn 17% less than other comparable occupations. As their careers progress teachers fall further behind other occupations, computer programmers $79,530, RNs $69,790, teachers $53,310 on average. Enrollment in teacher ed majors is falling rapidly as students have seen teaching as a high stress, politically charged endeavor with cuts being made across the board to benefits, school programs, funding, and wages. California has seen a 53% decrease in teacher prep programs. Blaming teachers for complicated educational failings is like blaming the police for crime.
may I ask what your field of study was and why you quit? for me it was what at the time called "psychobiology" which was essentially neurology as it relates to behavior. it is now known as behavioral neuroscience. I quit because I had to care for my ill mother and couldn't commit to the 6 years it would take to earn a B.S. At the time the University of California Irvine (UCI) was the only college on the west coast that offered it and the requirements for admission to that program were grueling, that's why it would have taken 6 years instead 4, 2 at community meeting the prereqs and 4 at UCI. Then life happened, $$$ and the opportunity drifted away.
I went to school for a bit. Didn't know what I wanted to do so I stopped going. Didn't wanna waste anymore money or time.