Japan and Russia Will attack Their both our enemies!!!! PLEASE RATE AND READ!!!!!!!!!

Discussion in 'The Future' started by TokeMEup420, Aug 3, 2005.

  1. blindhobosam

    blindhobosam The Legend

    Messages:
    6,644
    Likes Received:
    0
    i met a chinese person called Yim Salkim...

    neither of those bits sound like cutlery being thrown.
     
  2. SirTokesAlot

    SirTokesAlot Lives

    Messages:
    3,573
    Likes Received:
    7
    Since the beginning of internet, people have been flocking to threads like these sharing their ideas and retarded accusations... god, seriously, you are wasting everyones time if you cant come up with an educated, and well researched hypothesis to share, instead of "Hmmmm, ha yuk, derrr... i thinks that them japs and russiaanians will compile all together like over yonder n come over hurrr to attack us" oh and that one idiot that decided to say "How is japan our enemy if they send us anime"... go back to playing your lil pokemon or dragon ballz or some shit if thats your idea
     

  3. russia is selling us their nuclear material


    why would they do that if they were going to war with us?
     
  4. hippypaul

    hippypaul Hip Forums Supporter HipForums Supporter

    Messages:
    1,869
    Likes Received:
    1
    China and Russia working together in training - yep they were working together all right in a war-game that simulated the invasion of Taiwan - which is a country that we have a treaty obligation to go to war to protect.
     
  5. Kabbalist

    Kabbalist Member

    Messages:
    452
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ever since I discoverd Jerry on the forums I'm waiting for Russia to invade us!
     
  6. mascotucorazon956

    mascotucorazon956 Member

    Messages:
    134
    Likes Received:
    0
    i believe North Korea is not our only concern, but indeed a main factual enemy that has already stated that any action taken against them will lead to a grave future for America. n you know how focused they are with those WMDs

    BEIJING(AP) North Korea said Friday it will not give up its civilian nuclear program without concessions the United States is unlikely to grant, stalling progress in six-nation talks aimed at getting Pyongyang to dismantle its atomic weapons program.
    Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice earlier implied the United States will not continue the talks indefinitely, saying in a newspaper interview that the North had just a few days to show its willingness to disarm.
    China proposed that North Korea retain the right to a civilian nuclear program after abandoning its weapons, according to Russia's chief envoy to the six-nation talks. That proposal contains "compromise wording which could satisfy both sides," Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Alexander Alexeyev said, referring to the United States and North Korea.
    But Pyongyang vowed anew not to give up its atomic program without getting concessions first.
    "We will never give up our nuclear" program before the U.S. nuclear threat is removed from the Korean peninsula, North Korean spokesman Hyun Hak Bong told reporters, referring to Pyongyang's claims that it needs nuclear arms to defend itself.
    "We will just do it our way. For us, we cannot stop our way of peaceful nuclear activities for one minute," Hyun said, reading from a written statement.
    Hyun did not react directly to China's proposal, aimed at breaking a stalemate over Pyongyang's demand that it be given a nuclear reactor to generate power _ a demand the United States rejects.
    The North also blasted Washington's contention that it first give up all nuclear programs, saying the United States "should not even dream" about the North accepting such "brigandish" demands.
    North Korea has demanded it be given a nuclear reactor for generating electricity before disarming. But Washington has insisted the North cannot be trusted with any nuclear program given its history of pursuing atomic bombs.
    Hyun said Pyongyang would be willing to see the nuclear reactor co-managed and that it would be open to international inspections. It was unclear if those comments would make any difference to the U.S. side, which has branded the idea a "nonstarter."
    Published - Sept 16 2005 10:35AM CDT
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice