Jon Stewart and "Liberal Fascism"

And that is why the authorized, establishment politicians -- regardless if they are Democrat or Republican -- are all promoting a statist, collectivist agenda.

 

Does every conversation involving you ALWAYS have to lead back to the NWO Rat?

 

The only one here being a prick is YOU, pal.

 

Sure. You started off by saying that they were both effectively the same on any practical level, but you couldn't quite resist differentiating them by which side your political identity is associated with...IE, you HAD to point out that the "other side" was marginally worse.

Of course, if body count is all that matters, then the championship rankings are as follows:

Communism: 57,000,000

American-style Republic: 10,000,000

Fascism: 9,000,000.

Ugly little truth, isn't it?

Thing is, the only difference between the 20th century's fascists and communists was efficiency. Ideologically, they are damn near identical. They just use different jargon.

 

Now where did I mention anything about the NWO?

 

Sorry I wounded your inner child there, Ma'am.

I will try to be careful of your self-esteem in the future.

 

Well, obviously. Anyone who thinks differently need only look at the vote in the house of representatives on the Homegrown Terrorism and Dangerous Radicals Act.

They talk a big game, but they all vote the same way.

 

But the thing is, TGRR, I don't align myself with any side. Unlike you, I understand the dialectical process. I don't join groups or teams or political parties. That's what seperates the individualist from the collectivist.

There is no difference between communism and fascism when you really get down to it, as both were funded by the same elite. This is precisely the point I am trying to make. Both were funded by Wall Street and London, and that's a fact.

 

"And that is why the authorized, establishment politicians -- regardless if they are Democrat or Republican -- are all promoting a statist, collectivist agenda."

You have to admit, you weeeere heading there, you were about one step away from calling people sheeple and posting pics of handshakes

 

What makes you think I have aligned myself, Ma'am? And what alignment do you think I subscribe to?

And these elite would be...?

 

But what I said is a simple fact. You are the one associating it with NWO conspiracies -- not me.

 

But Pressed Rat didn't say that, and what he did say was correct.

 

Please stop calling me ma'am. I am a guy.

I don't know what alignment you subscribe to, nor do I really care. You are the one who started by calling me a neocon for criticising Bill Clinton, when Bill Clinton has been in bed with the Bushes since the 80s at least. Why don't you look into the operation daddy Bush and Bill Clinton were running out of Mena, Arkansas during the mid-80s.

The central banks (the old monied families) in tandem with the transnational corporations and the various NGOs they work through. This has all been proven. Look into the work of Antony Sutton, who was a professor at Stanford. He wrote two excellent books about how the West funded the rise of communism and nazism.

 

Sorry, the way you were whining a moment ago, I thought you were a girl scout.

Then why did you just insist that I do something that I do not, in fact, do?

That isn't why I called you a neocon.

Can you be more specific as to which old-monied families, please?

 

Same reason you assumed that I was a neocon.

The Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, the Warburgs, the Carnegies, the Morgans, the Harrimans, the Duponts, the Oppenheimers, etc..

 

I think he means the Rockefellers, Rotschilds ect in which case, we are at the NWO arty:


To be honest I'm being a bit flamey tonight so I'll back off and leave it to serious discussion again.

 

Because I regurgitated a bunch of Rush Limbaughisms about Clinton vis-a-vis Vince Foster, etc? Strange, I don't remember doing that.

Seriously, Clinton was bad enough as it was. Repeating totally unbelievable accusations does not help your cause.

Wait. What?

The Oppenheimers?