LSD, The Stigma and The U.S. Government who created it

Discussion in 'LSD - Acid Trips' started by ShadyGrove, Aug 22, 2008.

  1. ShadyGrove

    ShadyGrove Member

    Messages:
    359
    Likes Received:
    0
    You can never argue with an atheist...
     
  2. Jim_Morrison_Reincarnate

    Jim_Morrison_Reincarnate Member

    Messages:
    160
    Likes Received:
    1
    You talk for to many people. I used to LSD ALL THE TIME! So you are proven worng in that aspect. And you tend to talk like YOU are EVERYBODY. The government is usually right. LSD isn't good to be legal. Imagine if everybody could get acid. This would be a scary world. It only comes around once in awhile for a reason. We can't handle it.
     
  3. A Bathing Ape

    A Bathing Ape Member

    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    What a wonderful world this would be.
     
  4. Thecookiemonster

    Thecookiemonster Member

    Messages:
    123
    Likes Received:
    0
    Is the gov usually right concerning drugs? dope.

    Yea if everyone had access to lsd it would be complete chaos..Have you ever heard of the 60s?
     
  5. ShadyGrove

    ShadyGrove Member

    Messages:
    359
    Likes Received:
    0
    When did I ever advocate that LSD should be legal?

    And what the hell man, I talk for too many people? I outlined a specific event in my life with a very strict motive, so how am I talking like I am "EVERYBODY"?

    Just because you have a drug addiction problem that led you to do LSD constantly or "LSD ALL THE TIME!" does not mean that I'm "Proven worng in that aspect". That just means you have a complete lack of respect and understanding of the chemical you were abusing.

    I think I put myself at a pitfall because for the most part I tend to forget that a good amount of people who drop acid don't know what they are really doing.
     
  6. Gormur

    Gormur Member

    Messages:
    330
    Likes Received:
    1
    Many people are afraid of what they don't understand..that includes hallucinogens. I know more people than I can count who find nothing wrong with doing literally any kind of drug...except acid.
     
  7. Share the Warmth

    Share the Warmth Member

    Messages:
    766
    Likes Received:
    0
    The government, as Bill Hicks has said, "has a lot invested in this ride".

    In fact it's the eye opening substances that the government has always been the most afraid of. Pot, shrooms, mescaline, acid. These threaten the established system far more than heroin and other blatantly destructive compounds. Acid destroys through creativity and empowerment. The thing it offers that frightens the government the most is self respect and an awakening of the individual as a spiritual being who has a worth beyond surface appearances. This is a direct assault on the materialistic and holographic hierarchy. Acid teaches you true power, which isn't grasping onto material, temporal things like a scared buffoon. Acid eats away at the wool over our eyes. It dissolves boundaries just as its name promises.

    The government tried to use Lucy to induce a state of receptivity, for mind control purposes, but of course she had other plans.

    The fact that acid got out like it did, and still continues to this day to tear open boxes and menace the US government, is evidence to my eyes that God actually opposes government supremacy over the individual.

    God is evolution, and as manipulative and penetrating as the government will become, it's too much of a mass entity, too solid and too slow to keep up with the ethereal process of evolution, as history has shown us. I don't want to give anyone too much confidence, because complacency aids the enemy, but history says we're advancing, all things considered.
     
  8. mattritt

    mattritt Member

    Messages:
    42
    Likes Received:
    0
    I had to argue the spinal fluid arguement today. He even said he had a friend that it happened to.
     
  9. salmon4me

    salmon4me Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,099
    Likes Received:
    4
    Speak for yourself when you say 'we'. It would seem that you should have said that you can't handle it (which I suspected by your username). :)
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice