megan fox... pretty or porn-star looking?

I agree. A diversified taste in the glamor world is much needed, although I myself would much rather be slim with some curve action.

 

:cheers2:

 

She can act at least as well as your a list porn stars. :biggrin:

I'd hit it. I'm a man, and pretty and fuckable/porn star looking are the same thing in my mind, because I enjoy sex with beautiful women.

It sounds obvious to me. Silly distinction.

 

I didn't say I was going to get married...

 

That's how it is now in the age of psychoanalysis. pull out the protractor to measure beauty. Maybe you're just a simple man who thinks with his wang. :cheers2:

 

Not to sound misogynistic, but my wang experiences beauty in ways your tiny female mind can't comprehend.

 

It is more often the men who psychoanalyze, which is why this post juxtaposed with your previous one is ironic.

Men are more visual creatures and naturally, they must be better at distinguishing beauty. Generalization, yes. Thirst distorts this.

Issues surrounding your schlong, I care not further, hot shot.

 

I would contend that visceral desire fuels recognition of beauty. A musicians who lusts over music can appreciate music on a deeper level.

I would also disagree that men must be better at distinguishing beauty. I was being tongue in cheek because you called me simple.

You also brought my penis into the equation. If you want to see it, try and be sweeter.

 

Hi Spencer *bats eyelashes*

 

You don't have to be sweet Z. :biggrin:

 

I kinda want you to say mean things to me and blow smoke in my face.

 

I think Megan Fox is hotter than any pornstar, but her failure to emulate Jolie and excessive makeup make her blandola.

She should slit her wrists and drink her own blood. that would be hot.

 

The two things I'm best at

 

Lust isn’t meticulous, that’s the point. It is uncontrollable and overpowering and so intrinsically it would overlook the individual features. The musician example is irrelevant, because I’m not arguing about thirst-quenching satisfaction. That's taking beauty beyond superficiality, which is not what I am talking about. Fuck's sake, we don't know Megan Fox.

I was serious about the men & beauty idea. Stake me now, but I don’t think men and women are inherently equal. This has nothing to do with human rights.

There’s no shame in simplicity, although I did want to annoy you. just think it's out of love.

 

anyways, back to the Fox... she's an attractive woman hands down.

 

I'm sure she doesn't NEED that much makeup... I sure don't and I've never been compared to Angelina. Maybe she's really just covered in splotches? That's my new theory.

 

wait, zilla, you're female?

 

I think the differences between 'classic' physical beauty and 'hotness' are based on the observer, and the style.

If Megan Fox was dressed in a victorian gown, was a good actress in historic period pieces, and wore a little less makeup, then everyone would think she's classically beautiful. It's style.

But at it's base, she would still look very similar. To me at least, because even though I'm capable of looking at someone sexually, I'm also capable of looking beyond the superficial. So I think you're wrong.

I don't think men and women are the same either, and there are differences. Amount of appreciation of beauty, I do not think is one.

 

Shes a knockout.

 

oh god man, you're ruining my game.