Meth and Oxycodone...

there's often a lot of compartmentalization involved, but it often comes from experience.

 

There's a big difference with a "drug user" that smokes the herb, trips, drinks and takes some pharmies every once in a while compared to someone who smokes meth and shoots up shit. I don't think it's right to criticize either but there is a difference. I know that the usual type of drug user is still in fact a drug user but if someone say's this/that is bad it's usually just looking out for them (or that's for me anyways). But comin off as rude is bullshit,useless and un-needed.

 

But no, there isn't. Guess what, for tripping, and doing pills, a good deal of the public would considered you a junkie scumbag. This is just justification of drug use. Just because meth can be made from stuff you can get in stores doesn't make it dirtier then say pill amphetamine, it's not like draino, pseudophedrine and bleach are put together and voila, both home made meth and pills being made in labs take chemistry of generally what would be seen as nasty things, it's just one comes in a nice little pill form.

Remember, tripping, those mushrooms you're munching on, if they weren't grown but handpicked instead by some idiot who went onto a farm, well those may be the last drugs you ever do.

 

look at this intervention this girl is addicted to 12 cans of dust off a day hilarious
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4qU57xPh5E

 

I agree, anyone who even smokes weed is usually a scumbag to society but that's not my opinion at all. I said I DONT THINK CRITICIZING IS ANY GOOD. All I was basically saying is there's a difference with drug users and people who are SLAVES to their substance.

And i'm a little confused what your trying to say about shrooms. I've had shrooms that were picked by people and yes your right if someone doesn't know what they are doing it could be the end of you. But that's a CHANCE/RISK you take and it's much safer then messing with hazardous substances. You take the same chance with Meth and other things.

Are you kidding me Meth is not any more dirty then pills made in labs? Let's see, ingredients in Meth: matches, lighter fluid, Anhydrous Ammonia, Iodine, Drano, Rat poison, brake fluid, ephedrine and lot's of other SHIT. That's why you get all twacked out and stay up for weeks.

You think that's normal? Your gonna say that's equally as bad as ingredients in pharmies? Lot's of that shit is hazardous and is meant for machines!! Not the human body. Pharmaceuticals do have nasty things in them and a lot of the time do cause damage because sometimes their made to "hide" problems instead of cure them but are not in the same boat as Meth at all. Don't try to defend Meth man, if you like it then more power to you but don't try to justify it because you know you can't do it with a straight face.

 

Hahaha dude me and my friend watched that one and a whole bunch of other episodes one day. That one by far made me geek out the hardest. I was stoned and every time i'd hear that sound that the dustoff made I cringed. That is one seriously weird ass addiction. :cheers2:

 

No, this is just a bad knowledge of chemistry. Those ingredients are not in meth, those are the common ingredients that can be found in the market that have the various chemicals in them that can be extracted, and then when certain reactions are made between the extracted chemicals and they are bonded together, you get the chemical molecule of methamphetamine:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methamphetamine

 

Lol okay friend, whatever you say. I'll take your word for it. But street meth is not being made in a lab. Dealers aren't concerned with extracting shit. Maybe that's why meth labs are basically a step away from being blown apart.

 

Ugh, you can't just mix stuff together and get meth, chemistry doesn't work that way. Meth labs explode because some of the molecules and chemicals isolated are extremely explosive, and things need to be heated and cooked in a meth lab so there's always a flame around.

Like ecstasy, 2/3 the shit that goes into meth is also in ecstasy. Not literally, meth is an oxidation, MDMA is a reduction. Point though is MDMA is basically still made from chemicals that are coming out of disgusting products

 

?? if MDMA is made properly i don't see how this is true at all. According to wikipedia the precursors are sassafras and isosafrol. I don't know too much about it, but i know meth is way more fucked.

 

yeah im sure the gangs/ cartels/etc know how to do a bunch of technical extractions and stuff.

 

PITS, you're being rather ignorant.
really.

 

Ignorant because I disagree? No, just irritated.

 

someone has to... and i don't think street dealers are going to be the same ones who are producing the drugs lol...

 

when you disagree with logic, that = ignorant.

 

I don't know about this but I always hear Meth is made everywhere. In peoples kitchens, not even a lab necessarily. I heard it's because it's sooo easy to make. It takes an hour. All I was trying to say is that the extractions aren't a big process and don't make the idea of Meth anymore clean. The people making it don't have any background in Chemistry.

lol...

 

What logic did I disagree with?

 

there are hundreds of different precursors and synthesis's for both meth and mdma. you can always clean the product yourself with minimal knowledge.

 

anythings ok in moderation. its that everyday thing thatll fuck with you.

 

Google shake n bake meth. its the funniest one ive ever heard of.