moon or bust?

The inhabitants of Atlantis landed a craft on the moon around 3500 BC. We can't confirm if it was manned or unmanned, however.

 

no i don't.

 

Moon or Bust? Damn, I thought this thread was about ass or tits!

 

sometimes conspiracy theories are a bit of an overreaction.....

 

the government lies.

 

There are theories on the arrival of the man to the moon, and one of them is this one, which we were cheated and which it would be the biggest deception of the history. It's said that there are certain suspicions in the emitted photographies, for instance, the way the shades are reproduced or how the American flag moves. But it's sure that there is someone who'll demonstrate the veracity of the landing to the moon that year. Personally I believe it was a true fact, because I'm not totally sure about its conspiracy...

 

Here's the thing, there is no proof of the landing area, the EU has their own space agency, not to send people into space but satelites, they didn't find anything, and the americans have been promising to take new pictures of the site for near a decade now.

All we have right now is u.s. footage of americans on the moon, in the height of the cold war era ( 1953-1975 ).

I need to be convinced to believe something this amazing of a feat.

It is also worth mentioning how the other space missions were taken so lightly, almost routine. It was the 1970s for God's sake, there's also the very inticing question of who owns the moon now? By all legality it belongs to the United States, but that has never been formally asked or answered.

 

No because we havent done it since. I mean if we could, dont you think we would have been there several times already? I think that we faked it because there was another country that was about to (I think it was the french) and the US had to feel dominate and say we did it first.

 

The proof is there infront of your face, why have the need to lie about it, besides look at all the advances we've made today. Beautiful things technology can bring.

 

my parents and i stayed up watching the continuous live coverage, as and while it was happening. if that hadn't been before a lot of you on here were born, i doubt this would even be a question. if i had been born later and only seen the retrospectives on it, then maybe i can see why there are questions and doubts. but state of the art, 1969, really would have cost as much or more to fake, most of what i witnessed live.

i think the only reason this is a question is because there are still religeous fanatics who want to go on beliving we're the center of a much smaller universe then it really is and the moon is still made out of green cheese. kind of like flat earthers.

=^^=
.../\...

 

That's such bullshit. No one owns the Moon, OR the Arctic for that matter. "We were here first, we placed our flag here, so now it's ours"? Throughout history that attitude has only ever caused trouble.

 

this is Such and old debate
it either really happened or it was faked in a studio somewhere
quite honestly it makes me laugh
i mean, why on earth would u FAKE going to the moon???
I do believe we landed on the moon in 1969....

 

Cause it's much easier to fake it then actually do it.

Considering how many astronaughts died in other tests the cost factor was also in play.

The astronaughts were in space, just not on the moon.

Well that's the accepted theory anyway.

There's a lot of loose ends in the whole procedure, like the most basic such as camera angles, I mean the final shot is just golden, where the astronaughts leave, going back, how the fuck was the camera set up?