Muslims In England

It often seems he has more faith in Putin's Russia (including their mainstream media ) than a fundamentalist muslim has in Allah.

 

Quoted for emphasis. Although the original focus of this thread was supposed to lay on the UK muslims that proclaimed to want sharia law in that country (right?) I even regard their unwanted behaviour not solely the fault of or caused by their religion, as explained earlier in this thread.

 

Wow your posts really show Odon-esque levels of tiresomeness. Funny thing is, if someone else had made my posts, I'm sure you'd be kissing ass over them.

For the record, its clear you know nothing whatsoever about Chechnya. And you conveniently, ignore the fact (as I mentioned!) that most Muslims were asking, BEGGING for Putin to intervene against the loons that called themselves the "Ichkerian govt".

And on the topic of Muslim maniacs in Britain, the topic is so clear cut its actually quite boring.
These are two of many links:-

http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4112/islamization-britain

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11057647/Rotherham-sex-abuse-scandal-1400-children-exploited-by-Asian-gangs-while-authorities-turned-a-blind-eye.html

Finally, on our resident Islamic fanatics claims, Wales did actually bring in laws in the 1880s regarding planning and pubs opening on Sundays.
Britain wasn't a demoacracy back then. Wealthy teetol loons from some tinpot fringe denomination pulled the strings in these tiny village backwaters. And furthermore, these bizarre rules were dead for many decades. Infact, they only surived in a couple of tiny rural shitholes because people wanted pub staff to have a day off, and for other rural community groups to flourish. It did NOT justify Asian maniacs attacking British people for walking down the street with a beer can. Nor does it justify the banning of alcohol like some tyrannical hellhole such as Saudi does. If you want to commit ethnic cleansing, do it amongst yourselves, back in the desert.

The idea that Islamic extremism can somehow be justified on the grounds of poverty is also offensive in the extreme. The gulf states AND others have the richest local inhabitants in the World. The problem is that the cult of modern Islam has spawned a disease that has spread into countries that are more civilised. That disease seeks to parasitically exploit the West and then vandalise it with its own tyrannical nonsense.

Put simply, if Sitka doesn't like a civilised way of life, with basic norms of human rights, then he/she shouldn't live in a civilised country such as a Western one.

 

since when is prejudice limited to race. racism has become generic for prejudice in much the same way that people often say coke as generic for carbonated cola.

religious and ideological prejudice are no less assinign, illogical and harmful then those of ethnicity.

neither are laws based on substituting christianity for morality, any less absurdly tyrannical, then those based on doing so with any other religion.

 

Haha, and that you are sure about such things is why people regard you as nonsensical to the point of crazy.

That's quite an achievement that you see that so clearly already as I have said nothing about that issue (except asked one question if you maybe weren't generalizing that whole muslim population over there).
Another sign that you are merely going at your own (very biased and russian news orientated) associations. That I ignored that is not out of convenience btw, but because I regard it as completely irrelevant to the topic we are in. That's another reason why i simply asked if maybe you weren't mixing different kinds of muslims up. But we can leave it to you to draw some absurd conclusion out of it It's not like I opposed what you were saying about muslims there asking Russia for help. But why bother to explain this to such a nutcase as you anyway...

Last sentence I spend on your biased crap: Saying the situation with UK muslims is so clear for you that it is boring does not make it that clear in reality (if it was the problem would have been solved already I reckon ). Because in reality there is more to it than just simplifying the situation to your generalized opinions on them.

 

Prejudice and racist are not the same word.

 

Disgusting, isn't it?

How does this give the green light to call anyone with a prejudiced perspective a racist?

None other than to start another discrimination war to divide and conquer the people. Later to dispatch the Discrimination Police and institute more laws that diminish what little constitutional freedoms we have left.

 

...ironic, considering this was British foreign policy for a century and a half.

 

All critical talk about human rights, discrimination and racism gets ironic when you look at historic policies of most western nations. If after that you compare them to the current state of affairs in this regard you may become ecstatic (although it is not perfect at all of course and probably will forever be a work in progress) But at least there are efforts made to treat people equal, even people that don't fit in the 'us' category. It's quite awesome.

 

this does not make it alright. they are equally evil.

 

Everybody has at least one prejudice.

 

Have you ever considered joining Cncac? You'd fit right in.