No one is guilty by association:

How are the Quakers, Amish and Methodists like Hitler or responsible for him? I don't get it. Could you explain that again?

 

He can't. It's logically impossible for him to make his point. That's the galling thing, I think. He can't claim that we're just victimising him, or that we don't want to hear "the truth" or are in denial of his "reality". He fucked up arguing his point, and there's no way he can argue otherwise.

 

you do know that quakers, amish and menonites are deeply, devoutly christian, right?

 

So? If you want all Christians to be implicated in Hitler's beliefs, why be dominational? You've never cared whether they were Catholics before. Changing your position?

 

Wait about a week, SC before asking that question. The Christianity forum has been given a week's rest.

Message for everyone: Please don't "F" it up. Just sit back, relax and let out a big sigh of relief. I'm sure the "S" will hit the fan in a week.

HTML:

 

Rad. So what, do we just sit around in our underwear eating Doritos for a week?

 

Frell ... Oh my Gawd ... I went blind ...

HTML:

 

I say we start putting up defenses.

cauldrons of hot oil, pitfalls, beartraps, and maybe a few landmines.

 

hey, thats pretty ridiculous... all say something but the result is nothing....just like a game to waste time...if you think "fedup" is useless and pointless why do you care what he writes...and as for "fed", i am not sure about his purpose yet...just watching the game, worried about the time i spend here...will anything change? i guess not...seems you cant change him, and seems he is teasing...anyway...i used to believe only islam was a point of rejections of the westerners, but now here, i see one of the most outstanding examples of the antichristianity though he claims it to be an anti-christianhypocricy...
so let me wait and see...

 

well, he's quite a lot like johnny2mad: a one note orchestra completely incapable of changing at all. except fed up cusses a lot more. i mean, i don't worry about it much, but still, it get old.

 

yeah, i had the idea he might be "johnny 2mad ", for johnny has similar attitude in Islam forums, but i wish he weren't...
johnny did not seem sincere to me , so i gave up replying him, yet i dont have an exact idea about "fed"...i really wish they werent the same person...

 

i don't think they are. johnny is a brit of longer standing with the hf. i'm all for a good fight, but sometimes shit just gets redundant.

 

Well yeah, FedUp isn't even entertaining really. You can't argue with him because he just refuses to take the arguments that he starts anywhere beyond the "I know you are but what am I?" stage of insults.

I hope he does realise that people aren't against discussing the bad parts of Christianity, and that they just don't want to be mercilessly beasted for no reason other than trying to put forward an argument.

 

"no one is guilty by association"...
yet everyone is born guilty with sin?
How does that make sense?

 

everyone is sinless unless he / she commits sins on purpose(at the age of puberty only/ no child can ever be responsible)....eva and adam have already paid for theirs... and everyone will pay for his/her own, and also for the ones' he/she led to sin, if he /she did... and no one can be punished for my own foolish, selfish deeds,
"the loved ones"of god turtured and died for my forgival? oooh, whats the point of being created and tested then....
really makes no sense to me...

 

No-one said the Bible made sense.

To be fair though, not all or even most Christian denominations believe in Original Sin. I can see the value from an ideological perspective in telling people that they're born sinning though; it provides an incentive to do good works as a means of atoning, rather than merely avoiding sin by doing nothing.

 

well, it's pretty freeing, really, the whole concept. "it's all up from here!" *snicker*