Police Chief Compares Blacks To Monkeys

why thank you very much.
I try to do my best to please
sorry if reality doesn't conform to the version you have in your head.

 

Awwwe shucks, it 'twernt nuttin'

 

I wouldn't notch at your assumptions that corporations aren't to hire your "white hippy ass" -- or that it can be difficult to be an old white hippy these days.
For you to say race is a non-factor is throw up worthy. White race is a non-factor. Being labeled American is a non factor. Being black is not. It's a factor in every stage of life and there's rivers of proof around you.

You haven't stepped foot in your poorest part of town if you think being black has been a non factor. Kind of sad this isn't common sense to you folk.

 

:bigcry:

 

I can compared fat people to whales, and my comparison's aptness is what would make it so offensive. I can compare fat people to ants and no one would be offended, despite the fact that an ant is a far more stupid animal than a whale. But, let's say that a comparison can be completely off and still be offensive. Perhaps if fat people were traditionally compared to ants for some strange reason by oppressing people then such a comparison would still be offensive to them.

So black people are nothing more like monkeys than any other race of people, let's take that as a given for the sake of simplicity. And people who've been oppressing black people have been comparing them to monkeys for hundreds of years. So understandably offense would result from the comparison. It makes the person making the comparison seem like a potential oppressor. But, is there actually any correlation between people that make that comparison and people who oppress black people? People who actively oppressed black people have been making that comparison for hundreds of years and perhaps most people who've actively oppressed black people have been making that comparison, but what about non-oppressing people throughout the centuries, have they been making that comparison?

But, that aside, let's assume for the sake of argument that there is a correlation. Are people actually most offended that the comparison reveals a negative probability about the one making it, or just that it's being made, or that one would dare to make it?

 

[SIZE=10pt]Hip Hop Hooray...Ho...Hey...Ho!.................[/SIZE]



[SIZE=10pt]Hotwater [/SIZE]

 

:dizzy2:
What?

 

Passive aggressive feigned stupidity; is that another example of your intellectual integrity?

 

nope, just muddling through your word salad that doesn't really say much at all.
You ever consider being clear and concise in your communications?

 

When navigating complex thought, the kind that one creates for himself rather than finding from a book of quotations, one must often choose between concision and clarity. It's reasonable to assume that most people including those of reasoning ability and intellectual courage would find a wall of text to be daunting if the author of it is unknown to them, while concise but less clear text remains accessible to at least the better half of the readers.

Anyway, I don't mind my words remaining inaccessible to you.

 

Sure sport, whatever you say.....

 

Would it be Okay if he compared to monkeys white people ?

 

It would be ok with most people. Personally, I'm a lot monkeys.

 

Theory of evolution, sounds pretty scientifically sound to make that comparison; apes though, not monkeys.