Sandy Hoax And The Boston Bombings

I know. I guess my point was that when you absolutely know that every single thing is gonna be called a conspiracy... (and have quite a few different explanations to what really happened), I think it can take away from the things that def are not as reported. And more people would look into and believe the things that deserve it if it wasn't always everything.

That said, I just read post #333. What do YOU think that means? I can think of a couple possible things... gun in car.. I don't know, his mom brought gun to school and let kid play with it... haha yea I know that would be crazy. Hm the more I think about it the more I don't even know what I think about that. So...?

 

I think it means that dna samples from 2 of the victims were discovered in inexplicable places . one was on a
shotgun in the trunk of the shooter's car . the other was in the Lanza home . I also think it means that :

1. a victim-to-be had once held the gun .
2. the dna had come from the crime scene .

 

Yes, it definitely causes one of those WTF moments, doesn't it?

 

the Sandy Hoax , in which no child dies , has been a useful theory . it has held the essence of emotion , and the
feeling is of unrelenting discomfort - that a mysterious something of the story has been horribly false .

it is evident that U.S. federal investigators conspired to essentially have evidence ignored so that the case
would be closed and a final report to the public be published . the evidence for this is in the final report that
was issued by the Connecticut Dept of Justice . the implication is that you will read of it and then attend to
this , taking it to heart with all your mind .

 

Why would federal investigators ignore evidence? What did they wish to keep from the public in order to close the case?

 

Is Connecticut Dept of Justice a federal investigative branch?

 

Why are you asking me? I'm not the one who posted information concerning federal investigators.

 

I thought you might be able to provide insight.

Federal investigators have no reason to ignore evidence but they do have reason to analyze evidence and get information out. Investigators determined those anomalous details were irrelevant to the overall picture of events. The thing that makes it seem relevant are tikoo's assessments of what that information could mean, There could be other explanations, accidental cross contamination of evidence being a readily simple one. Perhaps tikoo could provide a route to the document he read as it is that he reports on.

 

I think post 333 just reveals how gullible people can be. Has anyone verified it actually says this in the official report or are people just willing to take tikoos word for it? Tikoo, I just downloaded the official report. Can you please verify for me which page you found that on?


damn it, and I said I was through with this thread.

 

Yeah, Tikoo, you should provide the source for what you have claimed. Otherwise, it looks like you might have made it up.

I prefer evidence of bad acting, men and women wiping nonexistent tears, and people who change their story as time goes by; speaking of which, I'm still not clear as to which of Gene Rosen's accounts strike people here as the most believable.

 

of course . an investigator on the scene within the school could have also been the same investigator who handled the shotgun in Lanza's car trunk , and as well , just
such a person could have gone to the Lanza home inadvertently delivering a victims dna signature . It was not the purpose of the official report to provide such details .
it provided many facts and some assumptions - delivered a story - and announced the case closed . however , Dr. Watson ... this case smacks of professionalism , not so
much by the police and surely not of a first-time killer . there is another man and he speaks from the darkness .

just so , Holmes , shall the case remain closed ?

yes , I believe so .



dear friends , just how might you find the final govt report on the Sandy Hook massacre ? it's not a secret .

 

As to final report
While
no report is statutorily required of the State’s Attorney once an investigation is complete, it has
been the practice of State’s Attorneys to issue reports on criminal investigations where there is
no arrest and prosecution if the State’s Attorney determines that some type of public statement is
necessary. Given the gravity of the crimes committed on December 14, 2012, a report is in order.


It is the conclusion of this State’s Attorney that the shooter acted alone and was solely criminally
responsible for his actions of that day. Moreover, none of the evidence developed to date
demonstrates probable cause to believe that any other person conspired with the shooter to
commit these crimes or aided and abetted him in doing so.

Unless additional – and at this time unanticipated – evidence is developed, there will be no state criminal prosecution as result of these crimes. With the issuance of this report, the investigation is closed. Should additional reliable information related to the existence of accessories or co-conspirators come to the attention of the investigators, the investigation will be reopened.

 

The strongest case for doubt demonstrated by storch has been his subjective impressions of another's ability to communicate and the only way that can be construed as reliable evidence is through personal conviction.

 

55 Two of the items examined from outside the building of SHES, one from the shotgun in the shooter’s car and a
second from 36 Yogananda Street yielded DNA profiles consistent with the DNA profiles of two victims killed in
SHES, one in each. It is strongly believed that this resulted from an accidental transference as a result of the unique
circumstances of this case. There is no reason to believe that either victim would ever have come in contact with
these items.

 

Yes.

I feel beat up today for some reason so not gonna even try to figure it out more right now, haha.


edit... this thread is giving me a headache-or at least making headache i already have worse.

 

You can relax, nothing to see here unless you have a hysterical interest.

 

lol

yea not really.

 

Or, like some, have a need to react to alleged hysterical interest.

 

I was unaware that it is strongly believed.

 

It was directly from the government report... I doubt they asked you if you strongly believed it or not.