Seriously, do you think the Jews control the media?

Rense... the same website that has stories on UFOs and "The mysterious, eternal allure of Adolf Hitler", as well as holocaust denial.

You cannot pay back a loan guarantee because no money is handed over. This statement is completely ignorant, yet you describe it as a "gem".

I don't normally bother debating you any more, since you are widely reviled as a jew hating loon. But I just thought I would drop into to point out that a) you still frequent holocaust denying, Hitler glorifying websites, yet pretend you can't imagine why anyone would consider you anti semetic, and b) you are not particularly bright and don't put much, if any, thought or research into your comments, yet you consider yourself a deep sea of wisdom and insight.

 

I suggest you stay on topic and stop attacking my person.

If you have a problem with the list of individuals I provided, prove to me they're not pro Israeli Jews. The evidence says they are.


x

 

I am completely on topic, which is what has you bothered.

You are presenting a UFO spotting, Hitler glorifying, holocaust denying website as a good source of information on jews. This is ridiculous, but typical of the kind of sources you rely on.

You have also described a comment as a "gem" despite the fact that it contains glaringly obvious errors. I am completely on topic to point this out.

If you want to impress me, prove that these people are jewish and pro-Israel - you say the evidence proves they are, but where is that evidence? You didn't provide any. Do they just have jewish names, or are they practicing jews? And what does pro-Israel mean? Does it mean they think Israel should exist? Is this really a radical view to have? Can you prove either without relying on holocaust denying, Hitler promoting websites?

Where is the conspiracy that put all these white males in charge?

 

I'm not saying that every single person on the list is a hardcore zionist, but many are and they make no effort to hide the fact they are.

You can be pro Israel and not be a zionist. But even if you are moderate in your views, are you not going to give preferential treatment to the land you love? Another point is, should you speak out against Israel, groups like the ADL will make sure your time on the air is short. This is a tightly controlled aspect of western media. You don't trash Israel. Even if they're guilty. This bias is is very plain when you examine media from other countries outside of the corporate controlled ones.

Of this list, where are the blacks, hispanics, and orientals? They compose a FAR greater percentage of the population than white Jews do. They should be represented in the list in numbers, but they're not.

Because most of the top positions are held by this tiny tiny minority.

Now, compare the Bush cabinet list with the media list. Once again, ZIONIST Jews predominate.

Not just common Jews, but zionist Jews. Important point.

What are the chances of a tiny minority of a tiny minority winding up in such positions of power?

Media. Government. Banking. All three control people.

The lines that seperate these three are beginning to blur.

Let those who have eyes see.



x

 

You said "the evidence says they are" and now you are saying some of them are. So you're not sure which ones? You still haven't provided any evidence than any of them are. Where did you get this list?

Also you never explained why you think a holocaust denying, Hitler promoting website would be a good place to go for information on jews.

Once again, you post things you cannot back up. Why?

 

For reasons of his own Xexon hates Jews - oops, I mean Zionists. He cannot back up his opinions because they are delusions. Those who hate Jews need to lie about the reasons. Hatred of the Jews is the socialism of the gutter.

 

Do your own research. Thats a big list and I'm not going to spend all day gathering information about every single person on it. I'm not your librarian.

As for Rense.com, I don't endorse the site, but I don't call it worthless either. Many of the conspiracy sites are a trainwreck of truths and half truths, but still they often contain information that is useful.

Often more useful than the cleanly packaged evening news.

People who don't support this New World Order are pushed to the outside fringes of society and called all manner of names to divert attention from the real problem. The New World Order.

One built upon a secular Jewish supremacist movement called zionism.

That said, why would anyone but zionist Jews and their flunkies participate in it? The answer is they don't. If they are properly informed about radical zionism, most folks will keep their distance from it.

If you're looking to control the world, would intrusion into the media and government by these radicals be so odd?

Its what I would do if I wanted to rule the world.

If you did it by military force like the Nazis attempted, you would be routed soon enough. But, if you do it by stealth, positioning your people slowly over the years into the seats of power, you can achieve the same goal.

If you control public opinion in a "democratic" nation, you control that nation, it's wealth, it's military power, etc.

What is the best way to control public opinion?

The media.



x

 

Watch your step.

Skip has made it clear that personal attacks will not be tolerated on this forum.

I've made it clear that zionism is the problem, not Jews. So leave it be.



x

 

Exactly. You make the claim, but I'm supposed to back it up? You've got it backwards. You say "the evidence" says they are Israel supporting jews, but you provided no evidence and you refuse to do so.

But why would a source that denies the holocaust and praises Hitler be a good site for information on jews? Would you use a KKK website to look for information on African Americans?

 

Get over the website already. The list is a matter of public record. These people do or did hold the positions indicated. Whatever website it comes from isn't going to change the list itself, is it?

I lay information out there for people to look at. I'm not twisting anybody's arm to accept it.

I'm just raising awareness that there is a dangerous pattern forming. Take it as you will.


x

 

I will not ignore the fact that this is a Hitler praising, holocaust denying website just because you are embarassed by the association. That really is your problem.

The list contains errors - it says Disney is controlled by Shamrock holdings. In fact Shamrock has about 1% of Disney shares. Dennis Dammerman was never head of GE and in fact never even worked in the entertainment division. I can't even find any evidence he is jewish. How does this make him a jew which controls the media?

Which really only illustrates my point - why would you go to a holocaust denying, Hitler praising website for reliable information on jews?

The thing is you "lay out" a lot of information accusing jews of treachery and treason but when i do even two seconds of checking it turns out to be total crap, and you pretend that whether it is true or not isn't particularly relevant. Can you explain that?

The dangerous pattern is you posting anti semitic material to this forum and then pretending you've done no harm.

 

Knock yourself out trying to put words in my mouth.

Zionists, Not Jews in general. That's all that concerns me.

Now, I'm going for a bike ride along the beach while you replenish your venom sacs.

Study my ADL sig pic while I'm gone. I suspect you already know these people.


x

 

Because for decades there are so many jewish references in television shows, news coverage, advertising, and the fact that mainstream television glorifies young White "it" people, instead of including Asian, Black, and Latino's in that mix, it's only obvious that things haven't changed over the years. You can't possibly tell me with a strait face that all non-white people are not talented.

It's just so coincidental and convenient that when a white nobody is introduced onto the hollywood scene, no one knows who they are. Then all of a sudden with enough exposure, this white person becomes a household name out of nowhere. And because Jews have owned these networks for so long, chances are they won't be owned by any other ethnic group... And don't you dare say "oh, well you have your BET, and UPN so that should be good enough.". Simply put, Jews still own a majority of what we watch on network television - and you'd be blind not to see it. Think about that every time you watch the news. Blacks and Latinos are portrayed negatively, while every story that has to do with Whites is either uplifting, or a pitty story.

 

A good observation.

Most all media in the US is now a product of corporations. When you examine who runs these corporations, you can't help but notice that Jewish names dominate.

I'm not against Jews portraying their own culture on TV, but when you assist in guiding the world towards a mindset that Jews are above suspicion of any kind of wrongdoing, you are setting the stage for exploitation by those who have an agenda to fulfill.

Zionism has latched onto the media and now projects it's own view of the world through it. This affects how public opinion translates itself into votes and eventually the direction of the country itself. It affects US aid to Israel. It affects the Middle East. It affects every facet of our title as the last remaining superpower.

We're all going to hell in a handbasket with zionism.

I'm not going to go quietly. Neither should any of you reading this. Being a hippy means that you question authority and you need to get busy with that.

I'll remind the readers that Jews are followers of a religion and thats all. They are not a people or a race and are not entitled to any more protection under the law than Catholics or Mormons. Jewish culture is no different than any other culture born out of a religious belief.

But religions have always been fertile ground for power trippers who want to rule the world. The Catholics tried it and eventually failed. They ruled the world for a long time before being overthrown. The zionists are off to a good start. They need to be routed.

We don't need a repeat of history.



x

 

I don't need to put words in your mouth, you have been hoist by your own petard.

You say that, but its clearly not true. The topic is "do you think 'the Jews' control the media" and you provided a list of 'pro-Israel' (which you refuse to define or even prove) jews you think control the media. You also linked to an article which said seven jews (not zionists, not pro-Israel jews, just jews) control most of the media. You gave the article your enthusiastic support, despite the fact that it was hosted by a holocaust denying, Hitler praising conspiracy website that is also into UFOs. When I pointed out several factual errors in the article you refused to even acknowledge them

So you see? You say its about zionists, but you keep "accidentally" referring to jews. And you provide nothing at all to prove these people are even jews, let alone zionists. Its impossible to distinguish who's a zionist and who's just a regular jew to you, or who just has a jewish name, because you never make any distinctions and never explain how you decided who are the bad, zionist jews, as opposed to the good, non-zionist jews.

That's because there is no difference. Everyone with a jewish name is a zionist jew to you. The whole anti-zionism thing is a complete charade, and not even remotely convincing. In fact you are so lazy you can't even be bothered to do the charade properly any more.

How does this explain why a 1% shareholding is 'control'? How does it explain in what sense Dannis Dammerman is a jew who controls the media? And here's a new one - Shamrock Holding's principal office is in Burbank, not Israel (yet another error I found, with about two minutes research). You won't respond to any of these errors in your sources - instead you try to play the victim.

I know who the organisation is, I don't know and have never met or spoken to anyone there. Why, what are you insinuating?

 

Here we go again. But I'm not going to repeat myself bcause it does no good with you.

This thread is about what I consider to be a subversive influence in the media. Period. I won't debate about it because I don't debate. I won't argue about it because I don't argue. I voice my opinion and offer some commentary. If you want more action, try Stormfront or one of the other racist sites. They'll give you all the interaction you desire.

If you pursue zionists, they not likely to have names like Rodriguez or Yamamoto. As zionism is an offshoot of Judaism, most zionist Jews will have some variant of a Hebrew name.

Had I been a nazi hunter, I would look for German sounding names first. But in this case, "Jewish" names are at the forefront because zionism is a Jewish entity.

I look at ALL Jews first, then look for any evidence that would suggest they are zionist or not. I'm referring to political zionism and not the religious kind. 95% of Jews can be cleared immediantly. The other 5% deserves closer scrutiny. Of them, about 50% can be eventually cleared. The remaining names are involved in zionism to one degree or another.

But my personal interests only concerns the head of zionism and not the body of it. They're all secular Jews at the top. And they need to be exposed for the danger they represent to the world because of the supremacist movement they're engaged in.

As for the ADL, your manner of addressing me in regards to zionism is very similar to what I've heard from their representatives before. I've had numerous encounters with zionist antibodies online.

Maybe you're just a regular Joe with a concern over what you see as anti-semitism. Maybe not. Either way, I am unaffected and will continue to voice MY beliefs.

My beliefs tell me something is rotten in the western media and zionism is behind it.



x

 

How does this explain why a 1% shareholding is 'control'? How does it explain in what sense Dannis Dammerman is a jew who controls the media? How does that explain how Shamrock Holding's principal office is in Burbank, yet your article says it is in Israel? You won't respond to any of these errors in your sources - instead you try to play the victim. Can you explain why you don't give a shit that your sources contain glaring factual errors?

You provide no explanation of how you've been able to figure out which jews are the no-good zionist type, as opposed to the other jews in the media or government who are apparently OK. My theory is that you pretend to distinguish between the two, but actually you don't. So far you've given a lot of evidence to support my theory, since you have provided ABSOLUTELY NOTHING AT ALL to explain why these people are on your black list. In fact you have refused to provide any facts or logic for blacklisting these jews.

You visit a lunatic, UFO spotting, Hitler praising, holocaust denial website, and find something you like. So you post the link here. When I point out that this website is clearly anti semetic and full of conspiracy theory insanity, you say I should ignore the source because it doesnt' matter since the article is still correct. When I point out that the article is full of errors, you start whining about you are a victim of personal attacks and maybe i am some online zionist agent out to get you.

You see? The material you post here is complete and utter crap. Two minutes of effort cut it to shreds. Yet you don't seem to be the least bit bothered that time after time, you are accusing jews of treason and treachery based on false material you found on anti semetic websites.

Don't you think you would have more success convincing people to fear the zionists, rather than convincing people you are a jew hating loon, if you didn't continue posting material which is complete bullshit?

 

You're going to have to play by yourself. I won't waste another word on you.


x

 

How does this explain why a 1% shareholding is 'control'? How does it explain in what sense Dannis Dammerman is a jew who controls the media? How does that explain how Shamrock Holding's principal office is in Burbank, yet your article says it is in Israel? You won't respond to any of these errors in your sources - instead you try to play the victim. Can you explain why you don't give a shit that your sources contain glaring factual errors?

Do you think you can just run away when you get your facts wrong?

 

Wow, i didn't think anyone outside of Iran still thought in this way. scary.